Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Release
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Release (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a WP:CSD#A7 on this article on little more than it has had many contributors to it over the years, and hopefully one of them might be able to find some reliable sources. I can't find any to establish notability, though the band's name makes it frustratingly hard to find anything. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I couldn't find anything to suggest the band is notable enough for an article. --Michig (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet notability standards.Hoponpop69 (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.