Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talent Bizeki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talent Bizeki

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has earned at least two caps for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Zimbabwe. JTtheOG (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, an American decides to choose to judge us Africans by Western standards. If you want sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, then come and purchase our local newspapers that are printed and sold in the streets of Zimbabwe. Not everything we do is put on the internet. Mangwanani ^(talk) 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, a commenter decides to choose to ignore the dozens of European and North American articles I have nominated for deletion in the past few months. I understand your frustration. If I find sources for these articles, I will add them. Unfortunately, however, we cannot lower notability standards for subjects based on their nationalities. JTtheOG (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was making my way through articles being considered for deletion. You are lucky I didn't delete this and just recreate it myself. Your comments are inflammatory and unnaceptable. This page has been moved back into drafts. I'm going to let the original editor here decide what to do with it.

If you actually cared about the topic and not your pride as a contributor, you would've asked what to do so that this underrepresented topic (as you put it) could've been properly represented on Wikipedia. If original editor wants to move piece back to the article space, you're lucky. I won't be re-publishing it, but if another editor deems it okay to stay up while these problems are fixed I'll observe that decision.

Going forward do not speak of any group of people with such contempt. Faits1789 (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.