Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll number
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mostly Rainy 02:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Glossary definition with insufficient scope to warrant encyclopedic article. Lack of content precludes merging, so delete. Girolamo Savonarola 00:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete CSD A1 Hobbeslover 00:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per above, unlikely to be expanded --☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 01:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - not a speedy delete, it's a dicdef. I've spoken to the author before about his cinema dicdefs.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it WOULD be a dicdef, if it even bothered to give context. But I don't even know what this is defining Hobbeslover | (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this is a dicdef? The article only has two sentences, of which basically states that a roll number is (obviously) the number on a roll of film. WP:CSD states that speedy deletion can apply to "very short articles providing little or no context... [and that] limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion". There doesn't seem to be anything else that can be written to expand the article (what else is there, the history of numbers on a roll of film?), so it should qualify as a speedy delete. However, as always, please correct me if I'm wrong. --☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 05:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it WOULD be a dicdef, if it even bothered to give context. But I don't even know what this is defining Hobbeslover | (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - not a speedy delete, it's a dicdef. I've spoken to the author before about his cinema dicdefs.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete A1 --Terence Ong 10:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete --Guinnog 12:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete digital_me(t/c) 20:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.