Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Health Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Health Alliance

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. One source is to the company's (now defunct) website; the World Health Organisation citation doesn't mention the company; the third reference is one I added when seeing whether the charity is still active - seems they had zero employees and an income of £32 and expenditure of £267 in the year to May 2022, and it looks like they stopped operating in 2019. A before search found nothing other than routine coverage. The article itself reads as a promo piece. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations, Medicine, and England. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it certainly seems to be an academic-led charity which has been inactive for a long time. However, there was a bit of buzz about it for a while see this (pdf) and this and this. The trouble is that there doesn't appear to be a whole lot of information about what was actually achieved (most of these seem to discuss the idea of the alliance being good/bad) so it is going to be hard to write a page here. I'm not sure how to resolve this. JMWt (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those are good finds. In depth coverage in The Medical Journal of Australia. The piece in Diabetes and Primary Care only has two paragraphs about OHA so not significant coverage. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.