Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAVCO Business Security Services
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NAVCO Business Security Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Georgia (U.S. state). Owen× ☎ 20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or even speedy delete. Absolutely nothing in my searches. Geeraarts (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kablammo (talk) 09:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There's nothing in the article that would constitute a meaningful claim of notability, there are no sources in the article to support such a claim, nor could I find anything more useful in a Google search. The article is in its 14th year and there appear to be no other articles linking to this one, which doesn't help build a case for notability. Alansohn (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - very weak coverage, does not meets GNG. Bikerose (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.