Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Mayhem 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Mayhem 2008

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The event is itself notable but as an individual race, it isn't. The inclusion of this is like allowing individual school cross country contests to be included, which is hardly notable itself. Donnie Park (talk) 01:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 24. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 01:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't see any compelling reason why this specific year should have its own page. Bali88 (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of cycling-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- None of the articipants have articles, which suggests that none are notable sportpeople. From that I deduce this this is an amateur race (or event). If so, it is clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.