Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Assiri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus for Dawod Al Saeed was keep Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Assiri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - neither player has played in a fully pro league Spiderone 11:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete both - Fail NFOOTY as have not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mohammed Assiri - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Keep Dawod Al Saeed - Passes NFOOTY, has played in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Dawod Al Saeed has played a couple matches in the Kings Cup (Saudi Arabia) (1, 2, 3, & 4) Does this confirm notability? Inter&anthro (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It does, thanks for pointing that out, these are competitive matches involving clubs from FPLs so fulfill the spirit of NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as noted above player meets spiriti of WP:NFOOTY. Nfitz (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Dawod Al Saeed per Fenix down & Gene93k's reasoning. Mohammed Assiri should be deleted as it does not seem the subject of the article is notable. Inter&anthro (talk) 21:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dawod Al Saeed - As nominator. I missed the fact that this player had played a cup match between two FPL clubs. As such, I am withdrawing that nomination. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Dawod Al Saeed for meeting the spirit of WP:NFOOTY. Delete Mohammed Assiri for failing NFOOTY and GNG. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 20:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dawod Al Saeed per WP:NFOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.