Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumud Das
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kumud Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability has not been established, unsourced BLP -- Patchy1 23:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Notability not supported by google search, nothing in google news.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find significant coverage in any reliable sources independent of the subject of the BLP. J04n(talk page) 14:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I fail to see how this meets the notability guideline. Also, like J04n, I was unable to find relevant sources. — ṘΛΧΣ21 02:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patchy1
REF THIS BLP
11:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I was initially a little unclear about the choice to relist this, but looking more deeply I guess I get it. I do note that nobody has noted this source, which refers to an award of the UN Population Fund the journalist received. The non-English ... there may or may not be non-English sources, I suspect, but I'm not 100% certain, that bn:সুহাসিনী_দাস isn't the same person, automated translation is not being my friend. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't seem notable. I don't think "Laadli Media award for Gender Sensitivity" is sufficient.--Staberinde (talk) 11:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable journalist. Conducting a WP:BEFORE search revealed a number of publications he wrote for newspapers but none where he was the subject of the publication. Mkdwtalk 00:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.