Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Cash
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Yanksox 20:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One co-writing credit on a moderately successful film. I think not notable. kingboyk 10:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be notable. A number of related hits on google. Also has an entry on IMDB. Forbsey 10:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A writer on several films, seems notable enough and it's not as if we need the space. Ben W Bell talk 10:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as per above (certainly a writer on a few films rather than just one - is that enough?), although I note the tense needs changing. Seb Patrick 11:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Would be nice if it was expanded a little, but he certainly deserves an article. J Milburn 12:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets WP:BIO. --Terence Ong 16:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand Has a sufficient filmography, needs a bit of expansion but otherwise fine starting point. R.E. Freak 02:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appears to be a notable film writer. — TheKMantalk 23:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.