Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jareerat Petsom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and closed per WP:SK1(a). (non-admin closure) 2pou (talk) 18:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jareerat Petsom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The WP:NBEAUTY essay defers to WP:GNG, and I cannot find any significant coverage of the subject. I am only seeing mentions of her 4th place Miss Earth finishing mentioned in the article, but each one is just a name drop stating her placing—no in-depth coverage. — 2pou (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. 2pou (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, Environment, and Thailand. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As is usual with such pageant winners, there's plenty of coverage in the Thai media, e.g. Kapook.com[1], Siam Rath[2], Kom Chad Luek[3], Matichon Online [4] and Praew[5]. While not all of it is in-depth and original, there's enough to build an article on. This profile piece/interview in Thai PBS's English news programme might be particularly useful[6]. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I found some CNN Reporting and some Vietnamese reporting on her. It's borderline between passing mentions or not which is why I say "weak". CT55555 (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Withdrawn thanks to the foreign sources listed by Paul_012. Foreign press is always a hole in the basic WP:BEFORE search tools, and I am happy to withdraw, knowing that the sources WP:NEXIST. -2pou (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.