Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Coffey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Coffey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't see any of the WP:MUSICBIO criteria satisfied. Paradoctor (talk) 12:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Paradoctor (talk) 12:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete definitely no notability evident in article, no mention of charting releases, awards, nominations, innovation etc. InDimensional (talk) 11:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete. Page is being edited and updated. NatureAndMusicLover (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only sources are WP:ALLMUSIC, which isn't a reliable source and TM Books & Video which isn't independent of the subject. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.