Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heksis
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Heksis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing how this meets GNG, it just exists. If the author woudl create it on much more inclusionist pl wiki, it might survive there, but sadly, they did not. Trying to promote it on English is not a good idea, we have higher standards. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.