Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUCCUP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Fl owerparty☀ 05:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FUCCUP

I speedied this as vandalism on the basis of the name and the fact that the only "verification" of it is a blog, which isn't considered a reliable source. But the creator protested, saying "It wasn't vandalism! It's a real conference!" and another user convinced me on my talk page to undelete it. But I'm still not convinced it's notable enough for an encyclopedia, especially not with any reliable sources for verifiability. Perhaps speedying was too hasty, but I still say delete. Angr (t • c) 10:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. Crazynas 11:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable sources. Also needs to explain notability, such as major media coverage. Best done after the event per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Any meeting of friends or collegues is not encyclopedic. Now I'm off to BARBOOZE 2006 with a couple of mates. Weregerbil 11:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, unverifiable, nn. --Terence Ong 11:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- this is not correct. The event is quite verifyable per linked external sites. Also see [[1]]--Mmounties (Talk) 14:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom. --Strothra 13:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Paddles 13:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Google™ Avi 15:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a quick google search didn't verify the notability of the text in the article. --Supercoop 20:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is an annual event, typically attended by 100+ student journalists, some of whom go on to become high-profile professional journalists. See http://cup.ca/spin/ for information about the 68th national conference, which took place in January 2006 and some of the speakers there. And the site http://fuccup69.blogspot.com/ , while a blog, is an official one. TruthbringerToronto 06:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This fits right in with other articles about annual conferences we have. Just do a search for student conferences and you come up with plenty similarly notable, all covered with articles in our encyclopedia (see Canadian Undergraduate Technology Conference, WSC, Queer Collaborations and many, many others.]] --Mmounties (Talk) 14:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this reads like parody and/or nonsense. ("With any luck, there will be no weapons at FUCCUP 69.") If it's kept, extensive rewriting is needed to render it encyclopedic. B.Wind 23:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.