Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David's Sling (novel)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. With no new comments after 2 relistings, I'm going to close this as No conensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David's Sling (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The only reference (besides being in a list on Libertarian Futurist Society website saying it was nominated for an award) is the subject book itself. I'd say merge into the author article, but there is really no material to merge. Just self-description sourced to the book itself and unsourced praise written by the wiki-editor. North8000 (talk) 03:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep: According to the isfdb, there's three reviews, which satisfies WP:NBOOK. I wasn't able to locate online copies of the sources, though I did find a table of contents for one of them, and it had this book. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 14:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.