Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 20:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-referenced, and otherwise non-notable product Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only references are self-published and there are no non-primary sources that I could find. Vacation9 17:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No non-primary sources readily available as far as I can tell. Plus, given what it is, not likely to meet the requirements of WP:NSOFT even if sources are available. -- BenTels (talk) 18:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.