Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-omics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, please add any sources mentioned in this discussion to the article if not already there, renaming is an editorial decision. Davewild (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This feels like an artificial/original research distinction, not a concrete, verifiable, notable topic. Superm401 - Talk 06:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope I am doing this right, my vote is do not delete. Or has it even come to that yet? Please do not simply trust your feelings, various '-omics' are very common these days - just ask a biologist. Please try Googling genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, interactomics, functomics, textomics, glyconomics, and their corresponding '-omes', genome, proteome, metabolome, interactome, functome, textome, glycosome.
FWIW, here are some sources (sorry I have not had a chance to fix the -omics page with these);
- OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
- The importance of culturing bacterioplankton in the 'omics' age.
- CE at the omics level: Towards systems biology - An update.
- Combining omics data to unravel the regulatory network controlling Salmonella invasion of epithelial cells.
- And many others from querying PubMed for 'omics'.
--Dan|(talk) 11:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Dan's references, and examples. Please add them to the article to bolster WP:Cite. Zidel333 (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources seem good. See -ism and -ology. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- REname per above to omics or omes, since this particular article is doesn't take into account other -omics suffixes. 132.205.99.122 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.