User talk:W.marsh~enwiki
This account has been created to prevent impersonation.
doppleganger?
[edit]Who are you, and what have you done with our old friend, W.Marsh? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- @SmokeyJoe: I am very curious too. Have you found out anything yet? —usernamekiran(talk) 02:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Late reply to your question
[edit]See: Wikipedia talk:FAQ/Business#proposed addition, just in case you weren't watching that page. --Teratornis (talk) 16:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Cameron Belford
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cameron Belford. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Kingjamie (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Happy Independence Day!
[edit]As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
I see on The Highlands talk page that you have added information based on a book Louisville Survey, East Report. Do you still have the book? The article needs references and I was hoping you could {{cite book}} to improve the page. —Ost (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Air France Robbery (1967)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Air France Robbery (1967), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- There are no sources for the contents of this article. And by itself, having such detailed information about some robbery where nobody ever got prosecuted is incoherent.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oskilian (talk) 14:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Burkesville ties?
[edit]Nice picture of the courthouse in my hometown of Burkesville, Kentucky. What's your connection? - Draeco (talk) 01:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Marsh was trying to take pictures of all KY courthouses. He's retired from Wikipedia, so he will not be answering you, I'm afraid.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 04:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
University of Calcutta departments
[edit]In 2006 you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Law Calcutta University I have opened new AfDs on it and a related article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Law, University of Calcutta and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Applied Physics, University of Calcutta and you may want to comment. DGG ( talk ) 21:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
[edit]Several years ago, you were involved in a deletion review on Directional Michigan. Here is the original discussion. A new proposal for deletion has come up and you are invited to participate here.
This note is being posted on the talk pages of everyone involved in that discussion that still has an active account. Feel free to express your opions for or against deletion as you see fit.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Respect agenda has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article D-Link G604T Network Adaptor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There is no verifiability, its all original research and its not a notable product. Find at least one neutral review, or really this article should go.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jez t e C 19:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2
[edit]As a reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Michael Jordan, I thought you might consider commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced tag
[edit]Hi, I think the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuladhar now has adequate references and the tag can now be removed. Would appreciate your opinion. Karrattul (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
[edit]The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
[edit]The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998
[edit]So I know you have everything up to 1999 up, are you gonna be able to do 1998? Arjoccolenty (talk)
Bernie Siegel Nominated for Deletion Again
[edit]Just FYI, a second nomination for deletion has been placed on an article that you have weighed in on in the past. You can see the discussion at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bernie_Siegel_%282nd_nomination%29 Rosencomet (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Kuliglig , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Image2012 (talk) 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I think it would be better to do so. Image2012 (talk) 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
|
a heads-up
[edit]You closed an {{afd}} on Allahdad Bohyo and about six months later someone
started an article entitled AllahDad Bohyo.
I was curious as to the extent it is a recreation of the deleted article.
Anyhow, I thought I would let you know. Geo Swan (talk) 01:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called W.marsh. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name W.marsh~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
20:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)