User talk:Felipeedit

Gabrielle "Goldie" Nowee was not credited as a writer on Chris Brown's "Picture Me Rollin" on the Royalty album. Gabrielle is the Main writer on "Picture Me Rollin, Nobody (who's gonna) and Little Bit. This can be Verified and approved by Universal Music Publishing Group Corporate. Please make the necessary corrections. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.67.138 (talk) 23:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mike V • Talk 16:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pretty Girls (Britney Spears song). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 20:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Krakatoa Katie 21:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at X (Ed Sheeran album). Binksternet (talk) 06:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kiss Me Once, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 03:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Sleeep

Considering your history with disruptive editing, you are walking on a very thin ice with your latest edits. I suggest you format your additions correctly and stop adding unnecessary links where they are not needed. Thank you. Widr (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edit

Felipeedit, I apologize for one statement in my re-reversion of your reversion of my reversion of your edit. I complained that you were going to a blog site (Ultimate Music by josepvinaixa.com), but you went to another site instead. I reacted because it said is was a reversion of an edit, and when you did that, you also threw out several other changes I made. I will always revert revisions that throw out multiple edits instead of targeting the changes desired.

However, have you evaluated ThisSongSlaps.com? It does not appear to be a reputable news source. Instead, it seems to be a wiki-type website where people submit information. Basically, another blog. It still is not an acceptable citation. I understand your frustration in not being able to move Nervo to the day you are certain it will post it's new album, and you well may be right in that it will be on July 24 instead of July 11. However, until you can locate a reputable citation, I cannot support your edits. This is not me being mean, but me playing by the rules set down by Wikipedia. I am not doing this to attack you, and I am not trying to suck the fun out of Wikipedia for you. Just think of Wikipedia as a rule-bound vehicle of information, and where it can be driven is dependent upon sticking within the rules set down by Uber-editors, of which I am not one. Mburrell (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN-I Report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 00:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Felipeedit, I see you've responded on a few other editors' Talk pages. I just wanted to add that in addition to not using blog posts as references, I'd also strongly encourage you to leave clear Edit summaries with your edits more often. For example, when you remove sourced content as you did at It's Not Me, It's You , and don't leave an edit summary explaining why you did that, it is very likely that the result will be that your edits will be reverted. But I'm glad you are starting to communicate with the other editors – you may want also to leave a comment in the AN/I thread about you as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Circus (Britney Spears album) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kylie + Garibay

I am confused. Is this not the correct link to the 4-track EP? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, ok. I created a stub for Sleepwalker (EP), too. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unbreakable World Tour (Janet Jackson tour), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huntington Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, just because it has "already begun" does not mean it should be included. The reason you and multiple IP's were being reverted is because you were not adding a reliable source for the claims, and stating 2017 violates the crystal-ball policy. You've been warned about this multiple times and the constant disregard for Wikipedia policies has become tiring. As it is, the reference you included is not entirely reliable, so it can stay, but only if another more reliable one can be found. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 13:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 22:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Felipeedit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being blocked by adding content that other users take one month to find out and this causes envy in some friends moderator.

Decline reason:

Please discuss your own actions, not those of the others. Max Semenik (talk) 17:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Felipeedit (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Felipeedit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made no issue meaningless, however. I make mistakes like not put references and sometimes take the information rather than communicating that something has been canceled.

Accept reason:

Block has expired. Huon (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Felipeedit (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Felipeedit, you have made lots of good contributions recently and are a valuable editor. However, please always remember to use edit summaries and reliable sources for all your additions, so everyone can understand what you are up to. That said, I think the length of this block is a bit over the top for someone who is not intentionally trying to harm the project. All of us who have filled this page with warnings, especially as of late, could use a little more WP:AGF at times. Widr (talk) 18:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@5 albert square: made the block for "disruptive editing," but that does not seem to be an accurate description at all having reviewed your recent edit history. This makes the two week block seem a bit over the top, so if you can promise to include adequate references and edit summaries I will consider lifting the block. Karl Dickman ^talk 06:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know I do this 'good faith', forgetting to complete the edit summary (not sure how to italicize the area that was edited with it → before), just edit wikipedia because the artists I like need me or lack information. But I'm thinking about quitting. Felipeedit (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was from this report to AIV about the user adding original research and removing information. From what I can remember I think this is the edit that I saw that looked like original research. Maybe @Livelikemusic: can remember where they saw the violation occur.--5 albert square (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Felipeedit has a history of adding original research which cannot be verified through reliable sources despite warnings, and edit-summary reverts by myself and multiple other users. Also, their continued removal of valid content is concerning, as well. The good faith is always assumed, however, that should not ignore their continued ignorance of policies. And furthermore, given their comment about "because the artists I like need me or lack information" rubs the wrong way, and somewhat could be misconstrued as ownership of an article and/or artist. This change is just one example of adding in the original research. And when the cite their sources, which is not often, they linkrot and embed links instead of properly citing their sources, which are not always reliable (as pointed out earlier). As such, a two-week block seems valid, as they previously received a one-week block for sock-puppetry, for which he was reported and cited for battleground behavior. He has had these issues since April 2015, as cited in the sock-puppet report, filed by IndianBio. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 13:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Livelikemusic: 1) Can you point me to some instances where you have assumed good faith with this user? Some instances where you have tried to help them to understand the policies without links, edit summaries, templates and wikijargon? English is obviously not their first language, and some more humanly interaction might have been helpful.

2) Why did you report them at AIV instead of ANI, when AIV is meant for obvious and persistent vandals and spammers only? Usually reports like these are declined at AIV. I did notice this particular report hanging there for hours without any admin touching it.

@5 albert square: I have seen you making plenty of good calls at AIV, but if you can't point out a single violation that justifies a two week block without consulting the reporting party first, it makes me think that you didn't thoroughly investigate the report before acting. Widr (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave the link I found above.--5 albert square (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your link, but it doesn't look like original research to me. No one has challenged it either.

livelikemusic says I remove valid content it refers to page Kiss Me Once, where he put that Kiss Me Once Tour will go to America with 3 sources, where none of them said that. I removed it, he replaced and since then reports everything I do. Felipeedit (talk) 11:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Here to notify you that your block has expired. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Something to Remember. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 23:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:IndianBio. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talking Is Hard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shut Up and Dance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Owl City discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sia

Thanks for your edits to This Is Acting. If you are interested, check out the newly-created WikiProject Sia. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Only If..., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to GHV2. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding content to articles without reliable sources, including at times giving false "references" which don't support the content to which they are attached, and which sometimes don't even mention the subject of the article you are editing. When you started, yo may have genuinely not understood what you were doing wrong by not providing reliable sources, but by now, considering the messages yo have received, and the previous block for similar problematic editing, it is difficult to believe that you are not aware of what you are doing. When the block is over, please be more careful about providing proper reliable sources which do actually support the content yo are adding, as otherwise you may well be blocked for much longer, perhaps indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

June 2016

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sun sign astrology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nick Carter and Jack Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have been adding information that does not comply with Wikipedia policies, on Sun sign astrology. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It is also unsourced (article sources don't mention zodiac signs) , and is possibly synthesis, if you concluded these people's zodiac signs by looking at their birthdays. Please stop. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie

Hey Felipeedit, you are invited to participate in the move discussion at Talk:Kylie. Thanks. TheKaphox (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving personnel section

Please don't move the personnel section on album articles, as you did at Glory (Britney Spears album). It should stay after the track listing and before charts. Ss 112 08:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: ADM

Howdy. If you have a position on whether AnyDecentMusic should be kept as an option in the album ratings template, please weigh in on this RfC. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the warning, please don't make silly edits like these ones. Thank you. Acalamari 23:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit has caused me to block you for two weeks. This is your fifth block. Any more blocks could be for months or indefinite. Acalamari 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Felipeedit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Anastacia discography page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enya and thanks

Hi, Felipeedit! Hope you're well! Thank you for all your help on Enya related articles. Keep up the good work! If you can, sources for the country chart positions for The Memory of Trees need adding. This could be something on the to do list. Cheers! LowSelfEstidle (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mobile Orchestra does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Shania Twain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the article history, you'll see that this is not the first release date or album name. I'm tired of reverting unfounded information that will likely change. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Now Tour (Shania Twain tour)

The article Now Tour (Shania Twain tour) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:NCONCERT and WP:TOOSOON. There's absolutely no content here other than tentative information based on one WP:PRIMARY source. At the very least, it fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shania Now Tour

The article Shania Now Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:NCONCERT and WP:TOOSOON. There's not much content here other than tour dates other than tentative information based on one WP:PRIMARY source and two sources that offer little. Compare to other tour articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shania Now Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shania Now Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shania Now Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Broken Glass (Rachel Platten song)

The article Broken Glass (Rachel Platten song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

permastub song article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Broken Glass (Rachel Platten song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broken Glass (Rachel Platten song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken Glass (Rachel Platten song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jax 0677 (talk) 19:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beck discography

Can you provide a source for "Dear Life" being sent to Italian radio? Ss 112 03:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Kylie Jenner article

Hello, Felipeedit. Your edit to Kylie Jenner from back in February has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to the article without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images copied verbatim into Wikipedia. You may use external websites as a source of information, but the material you find must be properly paraphrased when added to Wikipedia articles. In addition, material on Wikipedia must be written in a neutral, dispassionate tone, without the informalities that are sometimes found in sources (such as slang wording like "slammed", as opposed to "criticized"). Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olympiahalle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Vamps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Felipeedit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Hi. If you intend to keep updating charts others have already started updating on Wikipedia every week, can you please make sure you add better URLs? You are adding the most basic https://nztop40.co.nz/chart/albums link, which will be outdated by the next week and no longer show the information you are claiming is at it in seven days' time. This is not helpful; I could maybe understand if you were adding a bare URL that was not a chart that won't update in seven days' time, but you are. Then, not only that, you go and copy the New Zealand albums chart reference I typed up, instead of doing your own thing, to two other articles after I started updating the charts! Honestly. This is really quite rude and not nice to do to anybody. I will update the information in time every week; there's rarely, if ever, a chance I would miss it, so you absolutely don't need to jump ahead of me and do it. Thanks. Ss112 06:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everything Is Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Felipeedit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soompi

Hi Felipeedit, regarding this edit on Be, you've used Soompi as a source to back up the info. However, its an unreliable source per WP:KO/RS#UR, so please don't use it in future. Happy editing! --Ashley yoursmile! 06:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Taylor Swift albums discography, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 21:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hallenstadion. And now, just a day later, you have done it again. Do you have reliable sources or not? — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 21:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]