User talk:Darwin Naz
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thinker78 (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome Thinker78. My apologies for this late reply. I am only able to able to explore the community, talk pages and noticeboards recently. The wikimarkups was initially daunting and I also thought your message was automated :). Anyway, the resources you posted were very helpful since I could just open my Talk page and find the links. The sheer amount of info for editors could be quite overwhelming.Darwin Naz (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse Invitation
[edit]
|
Hello! Darwin Naz,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
|
- Thank you for the invite Pharaoh of the Wizards. I will surely head there if I have questions.Darwin Naz (talk) 01:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to collaborate
[edit]Hello, my name is Yousif Kassab. I'm hoping to collaborate with you on the Heracles article. How do you suggest working together, or do you have any recommendations for where to start?TrueNeutral14 (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi TrueNeutral14. It's nice to hear from you. I think that you could choose to expand one or some of the entries under the Further Adventures, Other Adventures subsections.Darwin Naz (talk) 05:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Customer communications management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tablet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edits there. It seems you have access to some decent academic material on relevant subjects. I encourage you to keep contributing, to that article or others of your choice. If you do keep improving Goddess movement, you may wish to remove some of the warning templates at the top of the page, once you think they are no longer needed. There are complaints on the article talk page going back a decade, but not much real work for years, so your contributions make a difference - thank you. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Carbon Caryatid (talk). I appreciate the good word. I will take a look a closer look at Goddess movement whenever I have time and contribute as much as I can.
- Great! And as you're finding your way around Wikipedia, don't be afraid to ask for help - from me, or the Teahouse, or on talk pages and project pages. I'll give you a gentle reminder to sign your posts with four tildes ~. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I will do that. I am actually learning more about using this Talk feature and the norms entailed in my conversations with other users like you. Noted on the tildes. Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- It is a pleasure to mentor new editors who, such as yourself, indicate a desire to learn community norms, and contribute positively to the encyclopedia. Re norms: we indent each contribution to a discussion thread like this one, for ease of reading. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hessian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Darwin Naz! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 10:17, Monday, September 10, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
References
[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I will definitely send you a message if I have a question or need assistance. Also, thank you for taking time listing those resources. They will be very helpful. Darwin Naz (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Edit to Aesthetic Realism Lead
[edit]Hi, Darwin Naz.
Regarding your edit to the Aesthetic Realism lead, Aesthetic Realism does not hold “that happiness can be attained through a unity or harmony of the opposites such as the acceptance that the world is both beautiful and horrific.” Perhaps you wanted to simplify the lead by summarizing the study in one sentence, but this source misrepresents it.
The Concise Guide to Today's Religions and Spirituality is the publication of a right-wing religious group called Watchman Fellowship (based in Texas) whose mission is to convert adherents of what they call cults (defined as “mediators between you and God”) "to true Christianity." Any religion or movement that doesn't embrace the Walker Fundamentalist interpretation of scripture is listed as a cult including Roman Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Taoism, the Baha'i Faith, Native American religions, and on and on and on. It is hardly a scholarly work, and it is not part of mainstream Christianity but advances a prejudicial point of view that is far to the right and highly distorted. Walker, in a sloppy way, equates Aesthetic Realism with Taoism simply because it talks about opposites.
Aesthetic Realism is a very careful, wide, educational philosophy founded in 1941 and it is grounded in scholarship of the world’s literature, history, and art.
If the goal was to make the lead description shorter, maybe you could replace the Walker description with Eli Siegel’s description of the philosophy as "the art of liking the world and oneself at the same time, by seeing the world and oneself as aesthetic opposites.” (Using the NYT source you quoted).
At any rate, we need to take out the Walker sentences asap as not being a reliable source. I would suggest reverting the lead back to the way it was and perhaps adding the NYT quote as a summarizing sentence. This would provide a fuller and more accurate description of the philosophy. Nathan43 (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Nathan43. You seem to be very knowledgeable on the subject. Feel free to make changes to any of the edits made so that the article can be improved further. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Darwin Naz. I'm reverting now. Nathan43 (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Darwin Naz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Darwin Naz I have added projects Internet, Psychology, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. To reply please click here. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Gryllida. Thanks for the invitation. I will head to the pages you mentioned and will likely participate because those are areas I am very interested in. Darwin Naz (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Great. I am glad you like them, Darwin Naz.
Please let me know if you need any help. --Gryllida (talk) 01:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- I will. Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Great. I am glad you like them, Darwin Naz.
Dust up at the Teahouse
[edit]Just wanted to drop by and thank you for adding a new lead on the article I was working on. That was very kind of you! (re: Wikipedia:Teahouse#had article moved to draftspace)
Seahawk01 (talk) 03:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Seahawk01. Just also recognizing the contribution you are trying to put in especially given that we are encouraged to assume that editors do their work in good faith WP:GF. Best regards! - Darwin Naz (talk) 04:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Miss Virginia (film) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Virginia (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Virginia (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —0xf8e8 (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Replied at said discussion page. Darwin Naz (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks so much for you help on the Kalani Pe'a page! Allanbcool (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC) |
Emotive Internet moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Emotive Internet, does not have proper sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Specifically, this article is using a neologism, which is not explicitly referred to in the citations. See WP:NEOLOGISM for information on what such a page requires.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Citrivescence (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
adverse experiences definitely deter future participation.
[edit]i seldom edit articles anymore since i think every one has been reverted destroying hundreds of hours of work... POOF up in smoke with a couple mouse clicks by arrogant ASSHOLES ...
I even stopped participating in editing workshops, so the community has definitely lost a good editor because they ignore the harm of arrogant elitist editors --Qazwiz (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC) to be clear, i'm not saying my contributions were perfect, far from it, i expected editing of the material... but i defy you to find somewhere that a contribution by me had an attempt of improvement before some heavy handed revert eleminated my thoughtful typing. which by the way takes me twice as long as most since i don't usually use a regular keyboard --Qazwiz (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Qazwiz. That is true. Some forget that this is a crowdsourced platform and an article is supposed to be a collaborative effort. There are also so many rules that an editor could invoke and some of them are vague and even conflicting, so discussions tend to be overly protracted. Unfortunately, I do not see any way to get around it because reverts and deletions are also part of crowdsourced nature of Wikipedia. You can contest artbitrary reverts and deletions and seek consensus. But then, as I cited, it would involve another lengthy process, something one whose work is being questioned would have no drive to pursue. So what I can probably suggest is to be patient :) and, again, you should know that there are editors who understand your frustrations. I, for one, could promise a level-headed/objective help whenever I can. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Glion Colloquium
[edit]Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/pdfs/2014/Glion%20Summary.pdf, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Presently, I cannot compare my revision to your edit so I could not check the part you said was copied from that PDF source. I think I did use content from that document but sourced it accordingly. I believe that is how you came across that link in the first place. I understand the need to write in my own words but quotes are also allowed as reflected in this entry I added "universities exist to liberate the unlimited creativity of the human species and to celebrate the unbounded resilience of the human spirit," which is now listed under your edit. Also, I did not know that the previously cited PDF source does not have a compatible copyright license or how such license is determined. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Your addition of information from a self published source has been removed. Xulon Press is a self-publishing company and according to Wikipedia:SPS,"Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." Per Xulon Press, David Bird is a medical doctor with no specialization in the field of history.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Ahmed Al-Khabaz) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Ahmed Al-Khabaz.
User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
The section organization needs some rethinking IMO. "Criticism" is a very vague section heading for a biography article.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Rosguill:. Thank you very much for reviewing my article. I have edited the ["Criticism"] section. I also realized that it gave the impression that the subject is receiving criticism. Thanks again. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Michael Osinski
[edit]Nice article! ― Mainly 20:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Doomsdayer520:. Thanks for reviewing the article as well! Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a source
[edit]Hi Darwin Naz. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Leland Chapman. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). AllStarBio.com seems much worse. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ronz Noted on that. These minor celebrities, since you are probably talking about my edit for the Leland Chapman page, seems to be covered only by these outlets. That page lack inline citations and I tried to add some sources to some of the information given. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
FYI
[edit]Just a heads up that I moved your addition to the lede on Bricolage down to the visual arts section. It did not summarize the article content as the lede is meant to do, but fits very well into the visual arts section.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Can you clarify? Thanks. Wwwhatsup (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Wwwhatsup Done. Thanks for following up! Darwin Naz (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Germanic peoples drafting
[edit]Comments welcome! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andrew_Lancaster/Germanic_peoples_drafting Keep in mind that the article is currently frozen and the split proposal was called off by the proposer.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Gérard Gertoux
[edit]Respectable D. Naz. Let me tell you that I am working in Draft:Gérard Gertoux, but English language is not my native language. I was reading that you are a member of WikiProject Translation studies, so I wonder if you could help me in make corrections. Thank in advance if you have some of avaliable time. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. I would be delighted to help. I can check and do the corrections whenever I have time. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]
|
Just reviewed Henricus Sedulius - a very nicely written article. Thank you! Mccapra (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
- Hi, Mccapra. Thank you for reviewing the article and also for leaving nice words here. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for adopting A over on the wikiproject biography assessment backlog :)
[edit]
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thanks for helping out on the wikiproject biography assessment backlog Nerd1a4i (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Nerd1a4i! Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Missionary wives
[edit]Can you create a separate article for Lucy Goodale Thurston from Asa and Lucy Goodale Thurston? I think Lucy deserves a stand-alone article. KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Sure KAVEBEAR. However, you need to make the necessary editing at Asa and Lucy Goodale Thurston. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Laura Fish Judd
[edit]
On 5 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Laura Fish Judd, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American missionary Laura Fish Judd (pictured) taught a queen how to make dresses, co-founded the first school for Hawaiian children, and wrote about Hawaiian dining etiquette and cuisine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Fish Judd. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Laura Fish Judd), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, —valereee. Thanks for the update! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Lucy Goodale Thurston
[edit]On 12 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lucy Goodale Thurston, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that missionary and author Lucy Goodale Thurston survived a mastectomy without anaesthetic in 1855? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lucy Goodale Thurston. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lucy Goodale Thurston), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Bronisław Bandrowski
[edit]On 19 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bronisław Bandrowski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish philosopher Bronisław Bandrowski was trapped in the Tatra Mountains for days, but had already hurled himself into an abyss when rescuers arrived? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bronisław Bandrowski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bronisław Bandrowski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Ghmyrtle. Any discussion in particular? Or is it just an invitation to participate in the noticeboard? I can head over there and weigh in a bit later. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Questionable references
[edit]Please note that Ed-Tech Press has been determined to be an unreliable publisher; see the WP:RSN discussion at Special:Permalink/969121327#Odd publisher: Ed-Tech Press. I am notifying you because you added some references to books from this publisher in the past, and I have removed them. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Biogeographist. Noted. Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I have undone your cut-and-paste page move
[edit] Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Seth and Mary Eastman a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Seth Eastman. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Diannaa. If you have taken a look at the Talk page of the Seth Eastman article, you would have found that I am not trying to give the Seth and Mary Eastman a different title. I am also not trying to move it to another page by copying and pasting. I am trying to create a separate article for Mary Henderson Eastman in response to a request at the Women in Red Project. I, myself, believe that Mary Eastman deserves her own article. I am, however, unsure about the split in history you mentioned or if it is relevant to what I am trying to do. This is a bit complex because there are three pages involved as I create Mary Eastman's page: Seth and Mary Eastman, Seth Eastman (redirect), and Mary Henderson Eastman (current draft). Since you have reverted the edit, I am now at a loss on how to proceed. Darwin Naz (talk) 11:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- The point is that when moving a page, you have to use the move function, so that the page history remains with the relevant text. This is because a list of contributors is required under the terms of our license, and the page history is where the contributor list is located. I will move the page properly for you now.— Diannaa (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Move complete. There's redirects for Mary Eastman at Mary Henderson Eastman and Mary H. Eastman. These will need to be changed once your new article is live. Mary Eastman currently redirects to Eastman (surname). You will need an administrator to properly move your draft once it is ready for mainspace.— Diannaa (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your help! Darwin Naz (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Mary Henderson Eastman
[edit]On 26 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Henderson Eastman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Henderson Eastman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Henderson Eastman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, —valereee. Thank you for the update! Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
[edit]Thank you for your recent articles, including Eugénie Ginsberg, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Thank you very much for the good words! Four of my articles were featured in the Did You Know section already. The most recent two of these were self-nominated. Given the total, I am already expected to review other DYK entries, so that was what I was doing when the Eugénie Ginsberg article was completed. The script you mentioned was new to me and I have installed it. You will definitely receive a message from me if I would need a hand. :) Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz
Thank you for creating Ontopoetics.
User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gazal world (talk) 17:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you
{{Re|Gazal world}}and also for reviewing the page. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)- Hi Darwin. the template {{Re}} should be used without 'nowiki' tag (For example: {{Re|Gazal world}} without nowiki). So that the person you pinged will get notification. You can also use the template {{ping}} for the same purpose. -:) --Gazal world (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, @Gazal world: In my previous reply, I copied the code of your username from your post. As you might have noticed, I am not very good at editing source codes. :) Again, thanks for your help! Darwin Naz (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Darwin. the template {{Re}} should be used without 'nowiki' tag (For example: {{Re|Gazal world}} without nowiki). So that the person you pinged will get notification. You can also use the template {{ping}} for the same purpose. -:) --Gazal world (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ontopoetics
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Ontopoetics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Flibirigit. Thank you for reviewing the nomination. I have addressed your concern at the nomination page. Darwin Naz (talk) 03:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Ontopoetics
[edit]On 20 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ontopoetics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ontopoetics holds that the world is psychoactive and can respond to us if engaged? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ontopoetics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ontopoetics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Cwmhiraeth for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
miniaturization
[edit]Dear Darwin Naz,
In the miniaturization article, one edit mentions "the comparative ease in miniaturizing electrons". My understanding (from skimming over classical electron radius) is that it's completely impossible to miniaturize electrons. My understanding is that even measuring the size of electrons is very difficult. So I am *very* interested in any process for miniaturizing electrons, whether it is easy or not.
What process can miniaturize electrons? --DavidCary (talk) 15:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, DavidCary. It should be "electrical devices" not "electrons". This part has been edited accordingly. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Stefania Berlinerblau
[edit]On 7 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefania Berlinerblau, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ukrainian-born Stefania Berlinerblau was one of the first Jewish women to practice surgery in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefania Berlinerblau. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stefania Berlinerblau), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 12:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Analytical Psychology - request please
[edit]Hello Darwin, when you have time, would you mind looking over my translation from the French version of the topic, please. I have been going at it and will have made English errors I fail to see. I am fairly confident about the accuracy of the translation, as this is my field and I am bi-lingual. Here and there I have gone off-piste, updating and adding as the French version has dated. Many thanks!--Po Mieczu (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Po Mieczu! I have taken a look at the changes that you have made on the Analytical psychology page. They are quite numerous. The succession of edits - including those made by other editors - would make going over your translation work challenging. However, I can identify bulk additions you have made and I think that is where I could check. At this point, the most important thing for me is whether the added contents included their sources. If an unsourced information is widely documented, I might be able to help with referencing. If you can send me the link of the French page, it would also be appreciated. Best regards, (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Darwin Naz, for your response. The French version is this: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychologie_analytique I have replaced French references with English language ones where available, including page numbers, as I have many of the sources. It takes hours, as you know. However the entry is too important to be left as was. Any help is gratefully received. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, you added some welcome sources to this one. For consistency can you ammend the Spencer encylopedia reference to match the others, e.g. The Murray Crusades examples. Particularly, adding the author of the entry, and the entries name. I don't have access to this work otherwise I would have done it. Hopefully you'll feel like doing some more on this article. It needs a fresh pair of eyes. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Norfolkbigfish for the good word. I also have amended the reference format. It took me a bit of time to do this. See, when I do my editing I usually use the Visual Editor interface and reference using its Cite option. I had to learn the coding part of the sfn template and how it relates to the Biography. Kindly go over the changes and let me know if there is something I missed. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Np, DN. I tweaked the Hurlock & Mayer ones, have a look. Mayer I just added the JSTOR location. With the Hurlock one, Murray is the source, Hurlock is the editor. So added Murray & the chapter name. What do you think? Norfolkbigfish (talk) 14:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Forgot to add, is it possible for you to follow what I did on Hurlock/Murray for the Tucker one. I don't have access but would guess the entries have authors and the chapter is the entry name. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 14:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- The Tucker source is more like an encyclopedia and not an anthology of works. There is an Outremer section but it does not constitute a chapter nor bylined by an author. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- I was guessing, looks like I guessed incorrectly. Thanks Norfolkbigfish (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for your help. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- I was guessing, looks like I guessed incorrectly. Thanks Norfolkbigfish (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- The Tucker source is more like an encyclopedia and not an anthology of works. There is an Outremer section but it does not constitute a chapter nor bylined by an author. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
[edit]
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 13:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Cdjp1. Best regards and happy new year! Darwin Naz (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Milhist!
[edit]
Hello Darwin Naz and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peacemaker67. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Olga Petit
[edit]Hi. Nice article. But please see Wikipedia:Writing about women. The policy is not to use first names. It is, rightly I think, seen as being sexist because men are invariably referred to by their surnames. Roundtheworld (talk) 09:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Roundtheworld. Thank you for the good words. Regarding Olga Petit's first name use: I do also use surnames for articles I wrote with female subjects (e.g. . However, in this case, I decided to use Olga to distinguish her from her husband. When talking about them, it would have been confusing to refer to both as Petit in the same paragraph. Nonetheless, I will try to look into the article and see if I can find a way around it. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Olga Petit
[edit]On 28 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olga Petit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olga Petit – the first female lawyer in France – was a Russian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olga Petit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olga Petit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Zinaida Vengerova
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Zinaida Vengerova at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ffranc (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Ffranc. Thank you for recently updating the article and for doing the review. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Zinaida Vengerova
[edit]On 10 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zinaida Vengerova, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jewish-Russian Zinaida Vengerova, a pioneer in Russian decadence, allowed a circle of intellectuals to drink her blood in a ritual described as anti-Semitic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zinaida Vengerova. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zinaida Vengerova), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Darwin Naz (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,216 views (601.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
DYKSTATS
[edit]Your DYK hook about Zinaida Vengerova and her role in an anti-Semitic ritual in which a circle of intellectuals drank blood received 7,216 page views (601 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks during the month of February and is thus listed on the February stats list. Cbl62 (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Cbl62. Thank you for the update! Darwin Naz (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Marcelo Cortés
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcelo Cortés, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have tagged it CSD G7. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Revision needed
[edit]Would you review your edit to Sakuradamon Incident (1860), as I can't figure out what you meant to say in the sentence beginning "An account ..." Shenme (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Shenme, this edit has been made for some time already and I had to retrieve my source for this reply. Now, the "account" you mentioned should be clear if you are treating it not as a standalone sentence but approached in relation to the entire paragraph and the section itself, which is all about the consequences of the incident. Note that it specifically supports the preceding sentence, which described the ensuing violence of the Sonnō Jōi. The sentence merely states how Sakuradamon led to the resurgence of the warrior spirit (Jansen, p.295). This pertains to the Bushido or to the cult of the warrior, which had deteriorated prior to the incident. You can say that Sonnō Jōi was the immediate consequence while the resurgence of the Japanese warrior spirit (characterized by violence), as a long-term consequence. Darwin Naz (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
[edit]Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Émilie Tillion
[edit]On 7 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Émilie Tillion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Nazis at Ravensbrück killed French Resistance fighter Émilie Tillion by gas chamber for having white hair? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Émilie Tillion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Émilie Tillion), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Article assessment
[edit]Hi, I'm looking to understand how to improve the articles I create; you recently assessed Anthony Maitland, 10th Earl of Lauderdale as start-class, and I was hoping you'd be able to provide some pointers as to why it was assessed as such? Many thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- The previous rating was assessed using Rater, which confirmed the previous assesment. Anthony Maitland, 10th Earl of Lauderdale is a B-class article. If you want to improve the pages you create and target a specific assessment class, you can make changes according to its outlined criteria. For instance, if you want it listed as a good article, then you must satisfy these requirements. Darwin Naz (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Sonic deception
[edit]On 27 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sonic deception, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during World War II, the U.S. Ghost Army used sonic deception to confuse the Germans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sonic deception. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sonic deception), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Darwin Naz, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that you have in fact been supporting the project for some time with quite a number of biographies of women in various fields, some of them promoted via DYK. Given your extensive spheres of interest and the consistently high quality of your articles, you are certainly going to be a useful member of the project. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Ipigott for the good word. The project has a lot of interesting subjects that can be covered. I am glad to contribute. I will look into the resource you cited and will certainly send you a message if I need assistance. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red - August 2021
[edit]
|
--Ipigott (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rybinsk Tank
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rybinsk Tank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- I already tagged it CSD G7. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
Women in Red Women in Latin America contest |
| Darwin Naz Thank you for your additions September 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Nemecio Lopes de Carvalho
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nemecio Lopes de Carvalho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there - this change of yours, specifically to citation formatting/coding, has resulted in multiple errors in the referencing. I am not sure of your intent. (On my quick glance so i could have missed something), it appears that citations were working before your edit, but are now broken. This question here on your talk page is not about your content changes (I have commented on those in my edit summary), but rather about your intent with citation coding. --Merbabu (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- PS - I've subsequently decided to rollback your reference changes. Where 1 source is used multiple times, it should be done per WP:REFNAME and my partial rollback returns the citations to that format. --Merbabu (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, Merbabu (talk). That's fine. Maybe it's a glitch. The sources I added only included those infos in my additions (Mahidi) to the Indonesian era section. Feel free to revert any other changes that were made elsewhere. Thanks for notifying me. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Survey about History on Wikipedia
[edit]I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Frances Brett Hodgkinson
[edit]On 18 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frances Brett Hodgkinson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that English-born actress Frances Brett Hodgkinson (pictured) became the highest-paid theater actress in the United States in 1800? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Brett Hodgkinson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frances Brett Hodgkinson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Byron Root Pierce
[edit]On 11 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Byron Root Pierce, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Byron Root Pierce was Michigan's last living Civil War general? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Byron Root Pierce. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Byron Root Pierce), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 6308 views (525.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work! |
– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Kavyansh.Singh. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kalev Arro
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalev Arro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Steno Tedeschi
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steno Tedeschi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ester Julin
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ester Julin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Narses
[edit]Hi,
Thanks for the recent edits at Narses (comes)
There are two Narses's, both were Armenians in service of the Byzantines and lived around the same time and fought alongside Belisarius. The more famous one was Narses the Eunuch who was also the Grand Chamberlain.
The materials you added are mostly about Narses the Eunuch. I assume they are already covered in the article Narses, so I remove those. --Z 08:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Ok, noted. That explained why I thought there were inconsistencies in the date of the subject's death. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Julian Friedland
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julian Friedland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Cambridge criticism
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cambridge criticism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Liberty Affair
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liberty Affair, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz
Thank you for creating Mario Dal Pra.
User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Could do with an image for the infobox, if one is available. Good article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 18:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: Thanks for your interest! Regarding your comment about the need for an image, I can't find any file at Wikimedia Commons. I also do not have access to a photograph that I can upload there. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:26, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Darwin Naz:, I think you can upload one that is fair use as the man is dead. All you do is select the file upload, fair use. Select "This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use." and select "This is a historical portrait of a person no longer alive." and fill in all the fields. This image from here: Mario Dal Pra looks quite decent. There is a colour but it is a bit blurry. Have a go at that, and see what it looks like in the infobox. This one is not bad Mario Dal Pra. Either one would do. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 08:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Scope creep: Thank you for the information. It is very helpful to me as I often write bio articles. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I could fire it up, if you want. scope_creepTalk 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. I couldn't seem to find the "Fair Use" option you mentioned. Edit: Sorry, I found it. I was looking for that option at Wikimedia Commons. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I could fire it up, if you want. scope_creepTalk 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Scope creep: Thank you for the information. It is very helpful to me as I often write bio articles. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Darwin Naz:, I think you can upload one that is fair use as the man is dead. All you do is select the file upload, fair use. Select "This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use." and select "This is a historical portrait of a person no longer alive." and fill in all the fields. This image from here: Mario Dal Pra looks quite decent. There is a colour but it is a bit blurry. Have a go at that, and see what it looks like in the infobox. This one is not bad Mario Dal Pra. Either one would do. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 08:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Evgenia Debryanskaya
[edit]On 21 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evgenia Debryanskaya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Evgenia Debryanskaya, the lesbian activist who co-founded Russia's first gay-rights organization, was the first wife of Aleksandr Dugin, Vladimir Putin's "Rasputin"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evgenia Debryanskaya. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Evgenia Debryanskaya), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 5,671 views (472.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 13:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the update! Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Irene Rocas i Romaguera
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irene Rocas i Romaguera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Meinongian arguments
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meinongian arguments, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Userbox
[edit]Hello. FYI, I've had a userbox created for me, and I thought it might be of interest since you were involved with the WikiProject Novels/Crime task force. It says "This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction" and the code to implement it is:
 | This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction. |
. (Add double braces to the red text: {{ }}). Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the code seems to have a typo, causing it to appear incorrectly. Here is the fixed code that you can copy and paste.
| Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
{{User:KomradeKalashnikov/Userboxes/HB Detective Fiction}}
|
|
linked pages |
-- KomradeKalashnikov (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
[edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Please help: Libelous content
[edit]I see you are a member of WikiProject for Companies. I thought you might assist in an urgent matter. The section Digital Currency Group#Allegations of lending malfeasance is libelous, poorly sourced and needs to be removed. It is based on a Medium blog by an anonymous non-expert with 100 followers, which by itself is an unacceptable source according to WP:RSSELF. Medium is a platform similar to WordPress or Tumblr - while some editorial sites use it, in this case the blogger is anonymous and states in the article they relied on their own original research, and that the article was written as “speculation” based on primary sources they interpreted, thus failing WP:RELIABLE. I have a COI as a paid consultant for DCG and don’t want to violate WP:COI, which is why I am reaching out to related project members? Thanks much.CertifiedTurtle (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Correction to previous election announcement
[edit]Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
[edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Darwin Naz,
If you move a page from main space to Draft space, please tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2. This helps admins spot these pages to delete them as cross-namespace redirects. This tagging is easily done if you make use of Twinkle. If you expect to be draftifying articles, I encourage you to install script User:Evad37/MoveToDraft which makes the process very simple and also posts a notification on the talk page of the page creator. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Liz. Sorry about that. Does this mean that when I move from article to draft, it creates a redirect? I have done this draftifying thing once and this is only for this particular article, which I created. I just moved the draft to mainspace. It seems there was no redirect. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Roman Kalinin (activist)
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roman Kalinin (activist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Margaret Small
[edit]Thank you for creating the only thing is you say she got her masters degree from SUNY but you don’t say which campus. There are easily 15 campuses amd with no source …. Can you please update that part of the artoLr? BostonMensa (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- I cannot find any source that specifically cite the college she went to. The available sources, some of them, I am unable to use (e.g. Ms. Small's Linkedin profile and a Wordpress article) merely cited that she completed the cited graduate courses from SUNY Buffalo. I have updated the sourcing for you as well as the sentence so that it only reflects what's in the cited source. We are, of course, open for contributions in case there are editors who have the info with better sources. Thanks and best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 10:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Julian Friedland
[edit]
Hello, Darwin Naz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julian Friedland".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit] 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Elsie Charles Basque
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elsie Charles Basque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Artemis Intelligent Power Limited
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artemis Intelligent Power Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Cipriana Álvarez Durán
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cipriana Álvarez Durán, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Artemis Intelligent Power Limited
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Artemis Intelligent Power Limited".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
InMoment AFC
[edit]Hi Darwin Naz, I noticed you're part of WP:Companies and interested in tech companies. I recently submitted an AfC for a company and thought you might be interested. Would you be open to reviewing the draft or providing feedback? Appreciate any help in advance.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. A quick glance showed the content seems encyclopedic and you used third party references. Have it go through the process. I am unable to review since I am not familiar with the evaluation of articles with paid contributions tag. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, I appreciate your feedback. I wonder why that Wikipedian added the paid tag; I declared my COI on the talk page and followed policy as closely as possible. I will let it go through the process, but if conversations expand about the draft, can I tag you in support of the article?--Chefmikesf (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. A quick glance showed the content seems encyclopedic and you used third party references. Have it go through the process. I am unable to review since I am not familiar with the evaluation of articles with paid contributions tag. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Lacaton & Vassal assessment
[edit]Hi Darwin. Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know that I am total disagreement with your assessment of the Lacaton & Vassal’s article as low importance. Crikey! They won the Pritzker prize! I did a quick and partial search, the only Pritzker Prize winner (out of 23) that I found with a low importance rating was a Portuguese architect, Álvaro Siza Vieira. Almost all were rated as Top or High Importance, with a few Mid Importance ratings sprinkled here and there. Could you please raise the importance rating? Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 07:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again, Darwin. I just changed importance rating to Mid for the reasons described above. Hope this is okay with you. If not, feel free to change it back. It’s not really a big deal. Best. Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 12:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:JonsBones
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JonsBones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lollapalooza effect
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lollapalooza effect, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Fact checking one of your changes to Lacedaemonius article
[edit]Greetings Darwin Naz.
Back in February 2021, you made a number of changes to the Lacedaemonius article. In particular you added that:
"Lacedaemonius was the son of Cimon, a pro-Sparta general and Athenian political figure, and Isodice who was the daughter of Euryptolemus, a cousin of Pericles. He was a grandson of the famous Miltiades IV. An accounted cited that he had a twin called Oulius. He was also the brother of Miltiades VII, who was the oikist in the Adriatic in 324".
I cannot see how Lacedaemonius could be the brother of Miltiades VII given that Lacedaemonius lived in the 430s BC and you say Miltiades VII was oikist in 324 BC. Now either I have misread the paragraph or there is a factual inconsistency in the paragraph. Could you please let me know if I've misunderstood the paragraph. Otherwise could you check your sources to work out what the correct dates or relationships are for that paragraph.
Thank you. Chewings72 (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Chewings72. Good catch there. It turns out there are two Cimons: Cimon II and Cimon IV. The former was the father of Lacedaemonius (see Debra Nails’ The People of Plato, p. 339). It was Cimon IV, an ambassador to Philip in 326, who fathered Miltiades VII, the oikist (Cheryl Anne Cox’s Household Interests, p. 157). This should explain the discrepancy. Lacedaemonius’ brother was called Miltiades V (Nails, p. 339). Best regards,
- Thanks for clarifying the information. It all makes sense now. Chewings72 (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Rachel Pike
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachel Pike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Judith Braun
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Judith Braun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:David Lederman
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Lederman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Identity Performance for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Identity Performance, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity Performance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women In Red
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Judith Braun
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judith Braun".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. Thank you for your work on Fred J. Wiseman. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Great article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 07:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! Your review of the page is also appreciated. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Pike
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Pike".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Fred J. Wiseman
[edit]On 8 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fred J. Wiseman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fred J. Wiseman (pictured) delivered the world's first unofficial airmail flight by airplane? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fred J. Wiseman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fred J. Wiseman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Japanese translations' request
[edit]User talk:Immanuelle/Proposed article translations. --95.233.233.43 (talk) 10:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
[edit]Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Ellen Jean Griffin
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ellen Jean Griffin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Prod Spatial Proximity
[edit]Prod reason:
- Original research and synthesis. Yes, "spatial proximity" is central to geography and economics. Yes, special proximity is modulated by architects when they design buildings, and by urban planners when they alter cities. Yes, spatial proximity is important to user interface design and industrial design, and, yes, many books have been written on these topics. Yes, spatial proximity is studied by neuroscience (the so-called grid cells). Yes, in psychology and psychopathology, there is a concept of personal space. Not sure what gestalt has to do with it. This article is just a synthesis of these ideas; it only fails to mention that spatial proximity is important for quantum systems, and for the placement of satellites in orbit, to avoid e.g. the Kessler effect from excess spatial proximity. I do not see a path for converting this article into anything meaningful, beyond a dictionary definition.
67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Theodore Weicker
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Theodore Weicker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sylvia McGuire Thompson
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sylvia McGuire Thompson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Darwin Naz. Thank you for your work on Nicholas Schaeffer. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating this page on a 19th century industrialist; clearly written and appropriately referenced.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Edit to Charles E. Coffin
[edit]Hello, could you elaborate on the source "Senate documents" from this edit on Charles E. Coffin? It appears a bit vague. --Engineerchange (talk) 03:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikiproject
[edit]Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Nian, would you eb interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 09:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, @Kowal2701. I would be interested to participate in my free time as this is one the areas of specialization of the organization I work for.
- Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, the page is WP:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce Kowal2701 (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Richard Tedeschi
[edit] Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Tedeschi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Voting for coordinators is now open!
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
[edit]Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Talk page banner shell class parameter
[edit]Hello, just wanted to leave a note about the somewhat recent change to WP:PIQA. I see that you've been adding back in the class to the inherited templates after it was already added to the template shell on recent changes to Talk:John James Abert, but I don't think that's necessary anymore. Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Theodore Weicker
[edit]Hello, Darwin Naz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Theodore Weicker".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year
[edit]Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)