Talk:The Edge Chronicles

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Edge Chronicles article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list?

Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy series (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain. This series would probably qualify. Anyone care to add it? Tamtrible (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Edge Chronicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060825023702/http://www.skypirates.ru/english/skypirates_eng.htm to http://skypirates.ru/english/skypirates_eng.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of individual articles of books in this series

SUPPORT MERGER

Clear consensus to support the merger of the no-reference articles about the series into this article.Mgasparin (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think the no-reference articles about the books in this series should be merged into this article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While some of those titles are likely notable, I would support this merger. An interested editor could always reverse adding in citations to RS to help establish notability at a later date. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. While the books are likely notable, improving them as a branch of this article and then spinning them off into their own article when ready sounds like a better procedure than attempting to individually improve all the articles in a large book series. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually please could editors ensure that the content is cited and plot summaries are condensed before placing them here. They are best worked on individually. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quick query, does being UK Children's Laureate mean that Chris Riddell qualifies under clause 5. If this isn't a case of clause 5 I'm not sure what is? El komodos drago (talk to me) 07:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think that clause 5 applies, as historical significance is required. UK Children's Laureate (a national prize) establishes his notability, certainly, but doesn't put him in the league of Charles Dickens, for whom historical significance is clear by the passage of time. I therefore support the merges. Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But are there any works of Dickins which are not covered by clause 1 (i.e. are covered by 2 or more IRSs in a non-trial manner)? Clause 5 obviously has to cover some works clause 1 doesn't or it wouldn't exist. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Small amendment here: where there are trilogy pages, then a merge to the series seems more appropriate; so, merging to The Edge Chronicles Twig Saga and The Edge Chronicles: Rook Barkwater Saga, as appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 04:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

I conducted a reassessment on behalf of the Children's literature WikiProject as requested by El komodos drago. Specifically asked about were the multiple improvement tags and whether being Children's Laureate was an example of something which would qualify notability under NBOOK criteria 5.Through this reassessment I have raised the article from Start to C class and removed many of the improvement tags. First all of these should likely not have been placed as there was some degree of duplication between them. Beyond that the sources have been improved but are still somewhat lacking and over reliant on primary/SELFPUB sources. As for the Children's Laureate question my examination suggests it's not such an award. For it to be such an award I would expect substantial coverage throughout the United Kingdom, children's literature news sites, and at least passing coverage in the popular press in other countries. While I did find regular coverage in the UK and some coverage in children's literature new sites (particularly Publisher's Weekly) both these fell short, as did coverage in popular press in other countries (e.g. New York Times which mentioned it while covering Blake but not on its own merits). However in reality no one editor can make this kind of determination. An RfC can give weight to community opinion but it'll be the opinion of editors are AfD discussions who really decide the matter. I hope this helps. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 13:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Goom (The Edge Chronicles)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Goom (The Edge Chronicles) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Goom (The Edge Chronicles) until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Spiker (The Edge Chronicles)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Spiker (The Edge Chronicles) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Spiker (The Edge Chronicles) until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Mugbutt" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mugbutt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Mugbutt until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Hubble the Banderbear" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hubble the Banderbear has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Hubble the Banderbear until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Mother Horsefeather" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mother Horsefeather has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Mother Horsefeather until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Screed Toe-Taker" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Screed Toe-Taker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Screed Toe-Taker until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Screed Toe-taker" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Screed Toe-taker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Screed Toe-taker until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Screedius Tollinix" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Screedius Tollinix has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Screedius Tollinix until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Slyvo Spleethe" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Slyvo Spleethe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Slyvo Spleethe until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Thaw Daggerslash" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Thaw Daggerslash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Thaw Daggerslash until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]