Talk:Neurilemma
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could
[edit]Could someone put more text for general audience? -- Taku 01:56 Mar 5, 2003 (UTC)
- It'll have to be someone with subscription access: there are lots of hits on PubMed about the ultrastructure of nerves, but none the review articles that sound like good sources are available as free full text. -- dsws 05:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neurolemma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212061042/http://www.dmacc.edu/instructors/periphxs.htm to http://www.dmacc.edu/instructors/periphxs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Is "Blay Ambrose" vandalization? If not, what does it mean?
[edit]In the lead, a sentence is/was: "The myelin Blay Ambrose sheaths of oligodendrocytes do not have neurilemma because excess cytoplasm is directed centrally toward the oligodendrocyte cell body." Looks like it could be vandalized, since the sentence makes perfectly good sense without it, but I don't know that so I can't remove it. UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
What could happen if the neurilemma was damaged
[edit]Please I want some answers 103.14.90.134 (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)