Talk:List of people with kidney stones

List of people with kidney stones was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 3, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
December 24, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept

Current status: Former good article nominee

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shivani622.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing citation

I could not find suitable citations for the following:

His contemporary, John Wilkins, Bishop of Chester, could not face the prospect and died as a result.
- It may have been mentioned in the Baroque series of fiction by Neal Stephenson, but a factual reference is needed.
- According to:
  - Chapman, Allan (2005). England's Leonardo: Robert Hooke and the Seventeenth-Century Scientific Revolution. CRC Press. ISBN 0750309873.</
he died from a six-day stoppage of the urine, which was initially blamed on bladder stones. However, no stones were found during his autopsy. Instead he may have died from the mixture of medicines provided by his doctors.
While DJ'ing at a student event, British DJ John Peel passed a kidney stone, and then proceeded to auction it off for charity at the same event.
- Only mentioned in blogs.
Reggaeton artist Tito El Bambino briefly suffered from kidney stones.
In 2008, American Idol semi-finalist Robbie Carrico suffered with kidney stones on the night that he was eliminated from the show.
- He did suffer from stones, but there is no suitable reference for this particular incident.
No reference found for this supposed quote by catcher Joe Mauer: When asked about it he stated, "I don't wish that on anyone."

—RJH (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Good Article candidacy

I'm not sure this article is eligible for good article status. This page, I think, qualified as a list and, according to this, lists are not eligible for GA. --Midnightdreary (talk) 22:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you.—RJH (talk) 20:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kidney stone formers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am "Quick Failing" this article, I'm afraid. It is a list, and therefore fails the Good article criteria. Lists are assessed at Wikipedia:Featured_lists, so do feel free to consider nominating it there. However, before you do so, please consider renaming the article: "kidney stone formers" gives no indication what the article is about (I had to follow the link to find out, and I still don't know what the title means). "List of kidney stone sufferers" might be more appropriate. In addition, the lead paragraph does not contain the title, as required at WP:LEAD. I suggest you read that guide carefully in order to improve the lead: this should contain a summary of the contents of the article. Another thing you will need to do before considering featured list status is to show why this list is notable, and not just a collection of trivia. Perhaps a source which can draw conclusions regarding the sufferers, or what impact it had on their lives? ie. why the kidney stone is notable; why WP needs to tell people about it. You might also want to consider increasing the number of incoming links: this article is almost an orphan. Consider also potential categories. This is not a "kidney disease", but a list of people suffering from a type of kidney disease. Interested people are unlikely to easily find this article.

On a positive note: this is a comprehensive and well referenced list, which has taken some time and effort to compile. Well done! I am sorry we cannot recognise it at GA, but I hope things go well for you at WP:FL. Gwinva (talk) 09:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. "Kidney stone sufferers" is an incorrect title as not everybody who forms a stone suffers discomfort. It also doesn't seem as neutral.—RJH (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough: just explain the title in the lead. Gwinva (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst sufferer might be a slightly emotive (and therefore unencyclopedic) term, I'm not sure how you'd really know anyone had kidney stones unless they experienced discomfort from them? Granted a person may form them and never know, or form them and pass them untroubled, but is there actually anyone in that list to whom that applies, if so how did they know? and would it be notable anyway? In fact the article is mostly given over to pain and debilitation and the impact of renal colic on their lives, as you'd expect. In the absence of a better word, I'd say "sufferers" is poor but descriptive, whilst "formers" is rather ambiguous and possibly inaccurate. Apologies if I seem crotchety, I'm most definitely suffering! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.74.124 (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jan de Doot

His articles says that the stone came from his bladder, not his kidney. -- Beardo (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on List of kidney stone formers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it does not satisfy the criteria for "patent nonsense". Note that vandalism occurred prior to deletion notice. --Praemonitus (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of kidney stone formers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on List of kidney stone formers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of kidney stone formers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 14:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of kidney stone formers → List of people with kidney stones – I propose we rename this article to a ore passive and neutral form in the form of List of people with gout. Whether or not this type of article should in fact exist, the use of the verb "form(ers)" is weird. People do not intentionally have kidney stones are are not usually described as "kidney stone formers". It's also inconsistent with our titling - we don't title articles List of influenza infectees or List of gout developers. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. 'Kidney stone formers' could be chemicals that cause kidney stones, unclear that it refers to people who have them. Retswerb (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per norms ~ Amkgp ✉ 07:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, since the current name doesn't make much sense in English (WP:RECOGNIZABLE), and for WP:CONSISTENT reasons. That said, I think this is a WP:AFD candidate, because no one is notable for this, and it is not a defining characteristic. It's like having an article on people who have broken their fifth metatarsal. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it is a known term in kidney stone disease; see i.e here or search for the term "former" in this University of Chicago website where an entire department is devoted to stone formers. A stone former has chronic stones vs a person who might have a single stone in a lifetime. In terms of the people listed in this article, there's no way to know whether they are formers or not. Victoria (tk) 14:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: 'with' is present tense, so the proposed title would be misleading. Note that the original article was called kidney stone sufferers, but some people found that objectionable. Praemonitus (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support: More recognizable as per WP:RECOGNIZABLE than the present one.--Ab207 (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The proposed title is not ideal because some of these people no longer have kidney stones, but the current title uses an obscure, WP:ASTONISHing definition of a common-looking word. It seems that the proposed title is consistent with the other lists at Category:Lists of people by medical condition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.