Talk:How to Save a Life

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Meaning

I heard on the radio it was about the lead singer's brother; anyone else hear this and have a source for that, or was the DJ making things up? Kuronue 13:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The DJ was probably referring to "Over My Head (Cable Car)", which is about Isaac Slade's brother. Teemu08 17:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, he must have had it mixed up, since he said it during the opening phrases of "How to save a life" that "this song is about the lead singer's brother". Ah well. I still <3 the song. Kuronue 00:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The PS3 Song

There's a parody of this song on Youtube (as well as in other sites) titled "How to Kill a Brand" which pretty much bashes the PS3 console after it's launch. Does this deserve to be mentioned in the article? Vic729 13:30, October 23rd, 2007 (UTC)

Removing unsupported interpretations

Removing unsupported interpretations is absurd as this is a song that is left completely open. Interpretations are true as long as someone believes them 71.202.240.68 (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If we listed every single peron's individual interpretation of this song, and others, the article would become enormous in length and would not be nice to read. Your interpretations are no more important than those of others and so they don't deserve to be there when other people's aren't. All that is irrelevant though, as what you have written has no source and is original research and no-one is going to let that stay in the article. asyndeton talk 01:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

Can the references 6, 7 and 8 be called that as they don't actually link anywhere? Londonsista (talk) 01:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7 and 8 are both some sort of reference as they cite a particular date for the peak position on the charts, even though they don't link to a source. Ref 6 isn't really a reference - it's a note - so the subheading could be changed to "notes and references". •97198 talk 11:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HTSAL Music Video.jpg

Image:HTSAL Music Video.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HTSAL.jpg

Image:HTSAL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is that the song is the primary topic. A strong case has been made that it meets the usage criterion and no comments about the long-term significance criterion have been made, possibly because all topics of this title appear to fall under the dreaded "pop culture". Unreal7, as the proposer of this move it will be appreciated if you go through the incoming links to this article to fix any that need updating. Jenks24 (talk) 10:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– Given the far greater chart success and sales figures of the song in comparison to the album (the album didn't even make the top 10 in their own country), I think this is a case similar to "Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)" and "Blurred Lines", whereby the song is more prominent and should be the primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose removal of (song), support addition of (album) clearly no primary topic as RM indicates: expand baseline as dab page including How to Save a Life (Grey's Anatomy), How to Save a Life (Sara Zarr novel), How to Save a Life HanVoice video, List of covers of Time magazine (2000s) etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Not trying to be rude here, but, judging from what I've seen both now and in previous move requests, some of your opposition reasons are a farce. Unreal7 (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. The song is the primary topic by any reasonable standard. Calidum 13:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The song is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It received 23,596 views in the last 90 days, compared to 11,171 for the album, despite the latter being at the base name. Presumably a good number of people looking for the song came to the album on accident, meaning a change is needed to get readers where they want to go.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think In ictu oculi's reasons are farcical. It is a popular, catchy phrase to use as a title. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- But that has nothing to do with the primary topic, which is this. Unreal7 (talk) 08:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on How to Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to In Popular Culture

Greetings. I came across a Vine in which this song was featured. I added a short section about it. If you wish to change the citation, or remove the section entirely, feel free to. Intelleblue (talk) 01:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on How to Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on How to Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How to Save a Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223011154/http://www.fimi.it/classifiche_result_digital.php?anno=2007&mese=05&id=72 to http://www.fimi.it/classifiche_result_digital.php?anno=2007&mese=05&id=72

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]