Talk:Brockhole

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 15 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved Seems non-controversial based on the discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 22:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to Brockhole has been carried out.

Brockhole Lake District Visitor Centre → Brockhole – Neither the Brockhole website at http://www.brockhole.co.uk/ nor the LDNPA website at http://www.lakedistrict.gov.uk/visiting/placestogo/brockhole-redirect seems to use any formal name other than just "Brockhole". We need redirects from all other variations of course and I've just created them from Brockhole on Windermere and Brockhole, the Lake District Visitor Centre, but the common name seems to be plain "Brockhole" so let's use it. I've expanded the hatnote at Brockholes and the one here, to help distintinguish two visitor attractions separated only by an "s". PamD 17:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm cool with that. The biggest problem I had writing this article was what to call it. As you can see from the history, I had several runs at that, but none of them seemed entirely satisfactory, including the current one. Brockhole has the great advantage of simplicity; I guess I was too busy looking at the trees to see the wood. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 10:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I would note though the website calls it "Brockhole on Windermere" in places. jamacfarlane (talk) 22:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.