Talk:Bobby Darling

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Television Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.

If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.

thank God the article is back

If the actor had done so many movies ... for heavens sake don't delete the article again.. Just because you don't like the actor doesn't mean that he is any less important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.105.145 (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

seriously man

If he were American, now way his article would have been deleted... Wikipedia is dominated by western world and they keep deleting Indian articles... How could they know about such people... Even Baba Sehgal's article was deleted so many times... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.222.205 (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

The editor of the article is as confused as the sexuality of Bobby Darling.

In an interview to a private news channel on 10 August 2009, after the episode of Sach Ka Samna, on being asked about her crush and love life she answered to have a big crush on Rahul Gandhi and expressed her true love for him. She further pleaded Rahul to consider her proposal for marriage and to accept her as his life partner.
She was also offered the famous "rakhi ka swayamvar" show before Rakhi Sawant. There might be a show called "bobby darling ka swayamvar".

The article moves freely from he to she to he.

heeheeheee.

Introspection Is The Answer

C'mon people, don't be ridiculous. Rather than using the topic in question as a pretext for flaming Westerners, give a moment's thought to why the article was deleted in the first place, and you'll find the reason obvious.

This is not an article. This is an abomination.

It is an almost incoherent, tabloid-like account of abysmal quality masquerading as an information page which, I must say, closely resembles the gushings of a not-so-bright admirer.

If people do feel so strongly about Wikipedia featuring information on this particular individual, I invite anybody with even a little amount of knowledge on the subject to go ahead and perform a complete rewrite. Produce a stub, but by Thunder, blast this insulting piece of pseudo-information off anywhere it can see the light of day.

--Tshloab (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answering Mine Own Call

I couldn't bear to see a page in such squalid condition on the hallowed grounds of Wikipedia. Therefore, I took it upon myself to carry out essentially what can be considered a deep cleansing.

As I haven't an iota of knowledge on the subject, all I could do was try to decipher what was splattered here earlier, and translate it from pidgin to a more widely accessible dialect.

So, while this and countless other such articles still leave a lot to be desired, I can, knowing that I've done all that I could've done for the situation, breathe easy. For now, at least.

--Tshloab (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright review.

Acting career section obviously paraphrased from this site, so removed.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 13:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bobby Darling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]