Talk:Black is beautiful

On 26 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Black is Beautiful to Black is beautiful. The result of the discussion was moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kamila Pineiro.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Essay-opinion

Needs to cite sources, organize in encyclopedic fashion rather than essay fashion, and remove opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscelese (talk • contribs) 17:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the article overall needs to be proofread for grammar, tone, and flow. Right now it reads as very unacademic. NeptunianJellyfish (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

blackisbeautiful.se

I'm going to remove that link right away. It is an outrage to have such a link posted on a wikipedia artikel and quite frankly it's discussting! hvh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.220.205 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origins

Needs more the origin of this movement. Malcom X is credited for spreading it. Who else? Stillwaterising (talk) 00:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration poster

It seems to me that the illustration used in this article is kind of misleading. The poster obviously references the original movement, but uses it just as a a word play with its own party colors (the JU is the youth organisation of the conservative party, which is associated with the color black). Maybe someone with more political insight might want to shed some light on this, but I'd suggest to use an illustration from the actual movement and not something designed by an advertising agency years later in a completely different context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.54.101 (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me! Omarisafari (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would also request to remove/replace this poster as I see the same Problem as the user above. The article de:Liste_geflügelter_Worte/B#Black_is_beautiful (List of dictums/familiar quotations) in german wikipedia shows the poster as an example of the use of "Black is beautiful" by the Christian Democratic Union of Germany in the 1970s due to its association with the color black (as the traditional color of catholic/christian parties in central europe). There are also later examples of this appropriation which has nothing to do with the movement or even black liberation in the wider sense, like c:File:KAS-Black_is_beautiful-Bild-35219-1.jpg. I think this should be removed from this context or maybe be moved to a new section which discusses various forms of appropriation of the mere slogan (or as in this example also the use of a black person's image) for commercial or non-related political purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.58.243.56 (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed poster as per discussion. Someone else needs to find a replacement. Blurrim (talk) 09:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black is beautiful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220045250/http://www.bucks.edu/~docarmos/BCMnotes.html to http://www.bucks.edu/~docarmos/BCMnotes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs pictures

I never thought I would ever say that ever that on Wikipedia but...this Wikipedia article needs (among others) more pictures of beautiful black women. : ) There are some keys dates such as the first black model, or the first black model to have travelled abroad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OPAZL (talk • contribs) 20:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bible!

the expression itself surely comes from song of solomons 1:4-5 "Nigra sum, sed formosa" (I am black, but [i am] beautiful), and various choral adaptations thereof, no? why no discussion of that in the article? 2601:19C:5280:5BA7:8839:7D45:3921:410B (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 July 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black is Beautiful → Black is beautiful – Per WP:NCCPT QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:MOVEMENT. See also Talk:Free the nipple#Requested move 25 May 2020. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It was long at Black is beautiful, but was moved to uppercase in 2020 with edit summary "(it's a slogan)", which is certainly not within our guidelines or naming conventions. Dicklyon (talk) 06:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support and revert back to stable title In ictu oculi (talk) 11:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:ISMCAPS and WP:NCCAPS, and to be WP:CONSISTENT with other social-movement articles. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Contemporary Black Popular Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2023 and 16 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JBurn1, BY1243 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BY1243 (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]