Jump to content

Unisex public toilet: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Overview: moved (will need to reduce repetition)
→College campuses: this content came also from the other article
Line 191: Line 191:


Forcing trans / non-binary students to use normative gendered restrooms can stigmatize them daily by singling them out.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/gender-neutral-bathrooms-colleges_n_5597362.html|title=Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Are Quietly Becoming The New Thing At Colleges|last=Bellware|first=Kim|date=18 July 2014|website=Huffington Post|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=27 April 2017}}</ref>
Forcing trans / non-binary students to use normative gendered restrooms can stigmatize them daily by singling them out.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/gender-neutral-bathrooms-colleges_n_5597362.html|title=Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Are Quietly Becoming The New Thing At Colleges|last=Bellware|first=Kim|date=18 July 2014|website=Huffington Post|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=27 April 2017}}</ref>

There are over 150 college campuses across the US that are creating [[Unisex public toilet|gender-neutral restrooms]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.umass.edu/stonewall/uploads/listWidget/8749/bathroom%20FAQ.pdf|title=Gender-Neutral Restrooms|website=University of Massachusetts Stonewall Center|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319005410/http://www.umass.edu/stonewall/uploads/listWidget/8749/bathroom%20FAQ.pdf|archive-date=19 March 2015|access-date=19 November 2016}}</ref> In March 2016, [[New York City]] private college [[Cooper Union]] moved to remove gender designations from campus bathrooms.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://cooper.edu/about/bathroom-signage|title=RESTROOM SIGNAGE|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|access-date=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/29/gender-bathrooms-cooper-union-college-new-york|title=New York college moves to strip gender markings from all bathrooms|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=29 March 2016|last1=Redden|first1=Molly|access-date=19 November 2016}}</ref> In October 2016, [[University of California, Berkeley|University of California Berkeley]] converted several restrooms into gender-neutral washrooms.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/10/31/campus-moves-forward-on-gender-inclusive-restrooms/|title=Campus moves forward on gender-inclusive restrooms|last=|first=|date=|website=|publisher=|access-date=}}</ref>


In the United Kingdom, all-gender restrooms are sometimes found on university campuses. In early 2013, [[Brighton and Hove]] city council introduced unisex toilets, which did not feature the words 'men/gentlemen' or 'women/ladies' (as is traditional), but instead used 'universal symbols'. Other British universities including Bradford Union, Sussex and Manchester, have already or are in the process of building unisex facilities.<ref name="cavanagh">{{cite journal |last=Cavanagh |first=Sheila |date=July–August 2011 |title=You are where you urinate |url=http://www.glreview.org/article/you-are-where-you-urinate/ |journal=The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide |volume=18 |issue=4 |page=18}}</ref>
In the United Kingdom, all-gender restrooms are sometimes found on university campuses. In early 2013, [[Brighton and Hove]] city council introduced unisex toilets, which did not feature the words 'men/gentlemen' or 'women/ladies' (as is traditional), but instead used 'universal symbols'. Other British universities including Bradford Union, Sussex and Manchester, have already or are in the process of building unisex facilities.<ref name="cavanagh">{{cite journal |last=Cavanagh |first=Sheila |date=July–August 2011 |title=You are where you urinate |url=http://www.glreview.org/article/you-are-where-you-urinate/ |journal=The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide |volume=18 |issue=4 |page=18}}</ref>

Revision as of 11:01, 11 May 2018

Pictogram for a unisex toilet in Saint Paul (Minnesota) "Anyone can use this restroom, regardless of gender identity or expression".

A unisex public toilet (alternatively called gender-inclusive, gender-neutral or all-gender)[1][2][3][4] is a public toilet that people of any gender or gender identity are permitted to use. Gender-neutral toilet facilities benefit transgender populations and people who exist outside of the gender binary. Unisex public toilets also benefit people with disabilities, the elderly, and anyone else who may require the assistance from someone of another gender, including parents who wish to accompany their children to the washroom or toilet facility.[5][6][7]

History

Overview

Making public facilities accessible to diverse populations has long been a divisive issue. Historically in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere public toilets have been segregated by race, class, religion, and gender, and have frequently been completely inaccessible to certain people with disabilities.[8][9] Gender segregated restrooms in the United States and Europe are a vestige of the Victorian era where women's modesty and safety were considered at risk and under constant need of surveillance and discipline. [citation needed]

In 1739 the very first gender-segregated toilets were created specifically for a ball in a Parisian restaurant.[10] The organizers of the ball made a chamber box (a chamber pot in a box along with a seat) for men in one room and for women in another.[11] While public water closets were considered necessary for sanitation reasons, they were viewed as offending public sensibilities. Because public facilities were associated with access to public spaces, extending these rights to women was viewed as "immoral" and an "abomination".[12] As a result of Victorian era codes, women were delegated to the private sphere, away from the public, fulfilling their roles as dutiful wives and mothers where any association with sexuality or private body parts was taboo. For women, the female lavatory in a public space was associated with danger, unrespectability, and even immoral sexual conduct.[13]

The decision to create separate toilets in the U.S. for males and females was a reflection of their shift and growth in society. As women entered the workforce and factories, they needed to have a place to relieve themselves. In the U.S., the very first regulation that enforced separate toilets for males and females passed in 1887 and was titled "An Act To Secure Proper Sanitary Provisions in Factories and Workshops."[10] At this time, Massachusetts required establishments to have separate privies in businesses.

While some public facilities were available to women in London by 1890, there were much fewer than those available to men.[14][15] During the 19th century, concerns over public health and sanitation led to the sanitarian movement in which citizens rallied for better sanitary conditions and advocated for better public waterworks systems and plumbing.[10] Although sanitary reforms continued through the 1900s, it became a source of political debate.[13]

Emergence of sex segregated toilets in the 19th century

Sex-segregated toilets date back to the 18th century in Paris.[7]

A separation of the sexes in public toilets and public lavatories was rather unusual until the 19th century. Usually there was a room for both sexes. It was not until the Victorian era, starting in Great Britain, that gender segregation began in the toilet area. According to Barbara Penner, professor of architectural history at University College London, this was an expression of the gender ideology of that era:

″Prior to the modern industrial period, toilets were frequently communal and mixed. It was only in the nineteenth century, with increasingly strict prohibitions on bodily display and the emergence of a rigid ideology of gender, that visual privacy and the spatial segregation of the sexes were introduced into lavatory design, and they continue to be its dominant features″[17] - Barbara Penner

United States

In 1887 the Massachusetts legislature introduced and enacted a law that mandated the separation of bathrooms by sex.[18] While there existed separate restrooms for males and females prior to 1887, this was the first law of its kind. The provision, titled “An Act To Secure Proper Sanitary Provisions In Factories and Workshops,” called for suitable and separate restrooms for females in the workplace.[19]

In 1887 Massachusetts became the first of the United States to pass legislation requiring any workplace with female employees to have a female-specific restroom.[7][19][10] Subsequently, other states created similar laws, often by amending existing protective labor legislation. 43 states had passed similar legislation by 1920.[10]

Legal scholar Terry S. Kogan lists four primary rationales for sex-segregated toilets as detailed by state statutes and related literature during this time period: sanitation, women's privacy, the protection of women's bodies, which were seen as weaker, and to protect social morality especially as it pertained to the nineteenth century ideology of separate spheres.[10]

The separation of bathrooms by sex in the United States was influenced by a number of factors. A combination of Victorian Era morals and concerns over public health fueled the desire to create separate toilet facilities. These Victorian Era morals of the 19th century held women accountable for being virtuous and modest, as well as cast them into the role of homemakers, mothers, and wives. As a consequence, men and women were placed into separate spheres: the former occupied the public (such as the workplace), whereas the latter were assigned to the private sphere (the home).[18] The Industrial Revolution, paired with the emergence of new technology and a booming economy, began to draw women out of the home and into the workplace– as a result, women began to enter the public sphere, a domain that was previously occupied by men. This was a cause for concern for Victorian regulators– they deemed the public dangerous and held the view that women, their morality, and their privacy were at stake by the “predatory” male; they pushed for separate restroom facilities for women in order to protect their reputation and well-being.[20]

During the Jim Crow period, public washrooms were racially segregated in part to protect the morality and sensibilities of white women.[21][22] During this time, architectural isolation was imposed– through isolation and partitioning, blacks and whites were kept in separate spheres and allowed whites to hold the upper hand in society. Strategies to keep African Americans out of sight included the “basement solution;” by locating colored restrooms in the basement next to janitor supply rooms, Jim Crow laws were able to maintain separation of the races.[23]

The presence or absence of public toilets is a reflection of its society’s class inequalities and social hierarchies. For instance, the lack of public toilets for women reflects the exclusion of females from the public sphere. Until 1992, U.S. female senators had to use restrooms located on different floor levels than the ones they were working on, a reflection of their intrusion in an all-male profession.[24] Until a bathroom for them was built, their presence and admittance into this professional field was not welcome.

In contemporary times, there are gender neutral toilets in some public spaces in the United States. Despite this, transgender and non-conforming gendered people are still sometimes subject to visual and/or verbal scrutiny; this is reinforced by the architectural design and heteronormative gendered codes of conduct that are still present within the US.[25]

Reasons for sex segregation

Legal scholar Terry S. Kogan lists four primary rationales for sex-segregated toilets as detailed by state statutes and related literature during this time period: sanitation, women's privacy, the protection of women's bodies, which were seen as weaker, and to protect social morality especially as it pertained to the nineteenth century ideology of separate spheres. Kogan's argument that modern-day restroom segregation emerged out of this Victorian model of gender has been cited in historical overviews of this topic by Time,[10] Public Radio International[26] and The Washington Post.[27]

The separation of bathrooms by sex in the United States was influenced by a number of factors. A combination of Victorian Era morals and concerns over public health fueled the desire to create separate toilet facilities. These Victorian Era morals of the 19th century held women accountable for being virtuous and modest, as well as cast them into the role of homemakers, mothers, and wives. As a consequence, men and women were placed into separate spheres: the former occupied the public (such as the workplace), whereas the latter were assigned to the private sphere (the home).[18] The Industrial Revolution, paired with the emergence of new technology and a booming economy, began to draw women out of the home and into the workplace– as a result, women began to enter the public sphere, a domain that was previously occupied by men. This was a cause for concern for Victorian regulators– they deemed the public dangerous and held the view that women, their morality, and their privacy were at stake by the “predatory” male; they pushed for separate restroom facilities for women in order to protect their reputation and well-being.[28]

Opposition towards segregation

The presence or absence of public toilets is a reflection of its society’s class inequalities and social hierarchies. For instance, the lack of public toilets for women reflects the exclusion of females from the public sphere. Until 1992, U.S. female senators had to use restrooms located on different floor levels than the ones they were working on, a reflection of their intrusion in an all-male profession.[24] Until a bathroom for them was built, their presence and admittance into this professional field was not welcome. Public bathroom facilities in 19th and 20th century Europe and United States were strongly segregated by sex, race, class, and religion,[29] but only sex segregation remained normative at the end of the 20th century. Though unisex public toilets have become more common worldwide in the early 21st century, such facilities have proven highly controversial.

All-gender restrooms are designed to ensure that restrooms are fully accessible to all members of society. While the issue of gender inclusive restrooms has been raised as an equity and human rights issue for people who identify outside of the gender binary, eliminating gender segregation in bathrooms also benefits disabled populations who may have attendants of a different gender, parents with children, and anyone who may need additional assistance using public toilet facilities. A-Gender restrooms can eliminate discrimination and harassment for people who may be perceived to be in the "wrong" bathroom.[7]

While opponents of unisex bathrooms have often referenced the fear of women and children being assaulted in bathrooms by trans women, there is no credible research to support this claim. Instead, there is substantial evidence that demonstrates that transgender people and gender non-conforming people experience substantial and significant harassment in public restrooms. One survey of transgender populations conducted in Washington, DC, by the group DC Trans Coalition, "found that 70 percent of survey respondents report experiencing verbal harassment, assault, and being denied access to public restrooms."[7] It also found that "54 percent of all respondents reported having some sort of physical problem from trying to avoid using public restrooms, such as dehydration, kidney infections, and urinary tract infections" making access to safe restrooms a public health issue.[7][29]

Advantages

Better use of available space

Especially where space is limited, the double design of the sanitary facilities is not possible or only possible to a limited extent. Unisex toilets are often used in many public transport systems, such as rail vehicles or airplanes.

Avoidance of social exclusion

For many people of the third sex, such as intersexuals or people with a non-binary transgender identity, it is difficult or even impossible to go to a gender-separated toilet, as they do not feel that they belong clearly to any sex. Sometimes these groups of people are even exposed to hostility when visiting the toilet. Parents of small children also face a dilemma if they want to accompany their small (opposite sex) child to the toilet.

Gender equality

In many public toilets, the widespread use of urinals for men means that there are more opportunities to meet their needs. Since about 90% of public toilets are used for micturition, there are regular queues in front of women's toilets with unused toilet cabins in the men's area. Clara Greed, professor of inclusive urban planning at the University of the West of England, related the gender segregation and the associated discrimination against women to the racial segregation at the time of the Jim Crow laws in the USA, which took place for similar argumentative reasons. Referring to the principle of racial segregation: "Separate but equal", Senfronia Thompson, the Democratic Party's colored representative in the Texas House of Representatives, criticized the current situation.

Disadvantages

The consolidation of previously gender-separated toilets and the construction of new unisex toilets is sometimes accompanied on the one hand by administrative and building law difficulties, and on the other by some public moral concerns.

Dealing with free-standing urinals

Combining the toilets raises the question of how urinals should be arranged in the room. While toilets are usually located in cabins with lockable doors, urinals are usually installed freely in rows in gender-separated toilet rooms. This construction leads to a smaller space consumption and thus to more possibilities for urinating, with hygienic and economic reasons as a main advantage of urinals.

Urinals have primarily been offered in men's toilets, with female urinals being a niche product (in Northern America). This is increasingly considered unfair from the point of view of gender equality. Abolishing all urinals would reduce inequality, however, this would also sacrifice the advantages of urinal. Another possibility would be to offer separate male and female urinals or unisex urinals that can be used by men and women alike, which allows increased flexibility of use. However, this would raise the problem of arrangement. One option would be to continue to offer urinals in rows, with separation by so-called pubic walls. However, it is questionable whether the less private sphere, compared to cubilce toilets, would be met with acceptance. Due to socio-cultural conventions, the open, joint use of urinals by men and women currently seems inacceptable for many users. An alternative would be to accommodate urinals for both sexes in cabins or to continue to offer them only to men. However, this would at least limit the above-mentioned advantages of urinals. Accordingly, the German lawyer and author Marcus Werner sees a significant disadvantage in unisex toilets if these would lead to the elimination of urinals in classic row order:[30]

"Therefore, it would be very, very sad if the unisex toilet trend would end up causing men to have to queue up because every urinal would be housed in a cabin, which would dramatically reduce the number of facilities. That would be a total waste of time, calculated in terms of gender. Men lose time without women winning. There can be unisex urinals here. But please use the ergonomically wall-mounted urinals in a row. That would take the pressure off everyone."[30]

— Marcus Werner

Urinals arranged in cubiciles often could not prevail in previous concepts; the advantages over conventional toilets were not obvious due to the unreduced space requirement. After 13 years, the four women's urinals in the Salzburg Congress House were removed in August 2015 for this reason. In the unisex toilets planned for Austin (Texas) in 2017, the urinals would be located in an area separated from the entrance by a door. These are designed as unisex urinals and would be arranged in open rows within this area.[31] This would allow men and women to use urinals side by side in the room if they wish to.[31][32] According to planning architect Richard Weiss, this would create the greatest possible freedom of choice for all genders:

The ultimate goal is that everyone should be able to do what they want to do, where they want to do it.
[31]

— Alamo Drafthouse architect Richard Weiss

Safety for females

School toilets that are not separated for boys and girls can lead to harrassment of girls. Amnesty International includes segregated toilets among its list of suggested measures to ensure the safety of girls and women in schools (see also violence against women).[33]

Legislation

China

Unisex toilets have appeared in China since before 2013 in Sheyang and Chengdu by 2015. However, it was not until November 19, 2016 that Shanghai China opened its first public unisex toilet near the Zhangjiabin River in a park, in the Pudong district. Many of these toilets have opened in high-traffic areas for the convenience of users as opposed to existing for the benefit of those in need of a gender neutral toilet, for example sexual minorities or those who are disabled.[34] In May 2016 a Beijing- based non-governmental organization launched an 'All Gender Toilets' campaign to bring awareness to this issue in China. This resulted around 30 locations opening unisex bathrooms.[35]

India

In 2014 the Indian Supreme Court gave transgender people, also known as 'hijras', recognition with a third gender.[36] This legislation included creating separate toilets for transgender people in public spaces where transgender people are often met with violence and hostility.[37][38] The two-judge Supreme Court bench was led by Justice KS Radhakrishnan, who said, "The court order gives legal sanctity to the third gender. The judges said the government must make sure that they have access to medical care and other facilities like separate wards in hospitals and separate toilets".[37] In 2017 The Union Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation sent out guidelines to the Swachh Bharat Mission decreeing that members who are part of the transgender community should be allowed to use the public toilet they are most comfortable with.[39]

Japan

As of 2016, still no laws were set in place regarding the usage of bathrooms in relation to gender identity; there may however be occasional signs in front of public toilets that indicate that the stall is 'gender free'.[40] The Tokyo city government is planning to install one unisex toilet in at least seven out of eleven of the buildings being used for the Olympic Games in 2020.[41]

Nepal

LGBT rights in Nepal have existed for a number of years but it wasn't until Sunil Babu Pant who was elected into Parliament, used part of the Parliamentarian Development Fund to build the first two gender neutral toilets in Nepalganj, one of which is in Bageshwori Park.[42] Starting in 2014 The Nepal Country Report, A Participatory Review and Analysis of the Legal and Social Environment for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Persons and Civil Society recommended that in schools separate toilets or gender neutral toilets should be built for transgender students.[43]

Thailand

The term "kathoeys" used to describe effeminate male-bodied people, for whom schools have started opening gender-segregated toilets for since 2003.[42] After legislation passed, in 2004 a private vocational college in Chiang Mai Thailand gave 15 'kathoey' students the opportunity to use toilet facilities that were solely for them,[44] referred to as 'pink lotus' bathrooms.[45] Alliance organizations in Thailand such as the Thai Transgender Alliance and the Transferral Association of Thailand were created to support kathoey people such as by helping create separate public toilet facilities. Kathoey enfranchisement was made helped by the creation of separate toilets at the Lummahachaichumpol Temple in Rayong.[46]

United States

Building laws in some states require that toilets be physically separated for both sexes, making unisex toilets virtually illegal. In the USA, especially in large cities and at universities, unisex toilets have been increasingly put into operation since 2010. With the election of Donald Trump as US President in 2016, the US President passed a federal law banning unisex toilets in public buildings. The US states, on the other hand, are holding on to unisex toilets.

American public restrooms are regulated by two separate federal agencies: the U.S. Department of Labor, which governs workplace restrooms, and the Department of Health and Human Services, which governs non-workplace restrooms.[citation needed] Many places in the United States are legally prohibited from offering only restrooms for men.[citation needed] These regulations are mostly based on the precedent created by original legislation, though they sometimes also work to eliminate the longer wait time females often face by creating a ratio of more female restrooms than male restrooms.

As of the 2010s, US public toilets are regulated by two federal agencies. The U.S. Department of Labor is in charge of workplace restrooms, which means setting state guidelines through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). For non-work related restroom guidelines, the Department of Health and Human Services governs regulations.[47]

Urinary segregation can also be caused by building codes, as buildings from different eras are subject to different codes.[48] In many situations, building owners do not update existing features because it allows them to continue following the older building codes that go along with those older features.[citation needed]

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission provides federal anti-discrimination protection on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy status, age, disability, and genetic information.[49] However, federal anti-discrimination laws do not extend to LGBT individuals. In May 2016 the U.S. Department of Education and the Justice Department indicated that single-sex schools and schools receiving federal money must treat transgender students consistent with their gender identity under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.[50] This has not extended such a ruling to transgender students across the board.[51] Each state, county, and city government enacts its own legislation governing how it will or will not protect the rights of LGBT individuals; this includes provision of gender neutral bathrooms.

The male and female symbols displayed on a door together are often used to indicate a unisex toilet

The United States Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that employers provide accessible toilets for all employees, and that employers do not impose "unreasonable restrictions" on employees who wish to use bathrooms at work. However, this federal requirement for employers applies mainly to the physically disabled, and to women employed in male-dominated workplaces. OSHA historically has not applied this law to transgender employees.[52]

San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, Washington D.C., West Hollywood, Austin, and the state of California have passed measures mandating that single-occupancy bathrooms in public spaces be labeled as gender-neutral.[53][54] Meanwhile, state legislatures in Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas have proposed anti-transgender bills that would restrict bathroom access.[55]

The Human Rights Campaign recommends that employers grant access, and use, to bathrooms according to an employee's "full time gender presentation", and provides a list of recommendations for employers on how to do so.[56]

On September 29, 2016 Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation (Assembly Bill 1732) after being approved by the Assembly and Senate which meant California became the first state in the US to require all single-occupancy bathrooms to be gender-neutral since March 1, 2017.[57][58][59][4] This includes California schools, government buildings, businesses and public restrooms.[60] Legislation has also been proposed in California that "requires...private buildings open to the public, as specified, to maintain at least one safe, sanitary, and convenient baby diaper changing station that is accessible to women and men".[61][62][63][64]

Opposition

In May 2016, North Carolina and the U.S. Justice Department disagreed on the issue, resulting in the Justice department engaging in a civil rights lawsuit over North Carolina's 'bathroom bill' in order to stop its implementation. This bill disallowed transgender people to use public restrooms if the gender of the restroom does not match their birth certificate.[65] Moreover, businesses in North Carolina have enforced toilet restrictions on transgender customers at their discretion.[66] Mississippi also limited public restroom usage through the enactment of a law that protects religious beliefs, citing: “male (man) or female (woman) refers to an individual’s immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics at time of birth,” which does not consider transgender and intersex people.[66]

Unisex toilets in educational institutions

Public schools

United States

In February 2016, Michigan was the first state in the US to pass a bill that forces transgender children and teenagers in school to use bathroom facilities that correspond with their 'chromosomes and anatomy' at birth.[67] On 22 February 2017, the Trump administration ended federal protection for transgender students that had been published by the Obama administration in 2016. These guidelines encouraged schools to let students use toilets or locker rooms that they identified with.[68][69]

United Kingdom

In 2015 Scotland aimed to create its first unisex toilet in Strathean Community Campus in Crieff, a secondary school.[70] In 2015 Unisex toilets were set to be introduced into every new school to be built in Scotland in a campaign to eradicate bullying. All future primary and secondary schools will have non-segregated toilets. The Scottish Futures Trust which is in charge of Scotland's government's schools building program has already trialled this in one primary school and two secondary schools.[71] In March 2017 the Glasgow City Council announced that toilets in school will no longer be labeled as 'girls' and 'boys' but instead be labelled as unisex to help students who may be struggling with the issue of gender identity. This will be implemented in three schools first.[72]

College campuses

As of 2014, there has been a trend on college campuses in the US to open all-gender public restrooms. Some campuses are renaming their existing restrooms and toilets to do this. The motive is in part an effort to make students of any gender to use the restroom and feel safe. Activists also say they hope that anyone - not only gender-nonbinary people - can feel safe, raising the convenience it provides to disabled people to get assistance from someone with a differing gender. According to a University of Massachusetts Amherst LGBTQ organization, The Stonewall Centre, there were more than 150 campuses in the US in 2014 with gender-neutral bathrooms.[73]

Research by the same organization comments on the need for gender neutral restrooms and the issue of safety. It says that certain people feel threatened using facilities that do not adhere to their gender identity, and this can become an issue when students are harassed by their peers. The organization states that this is more of an issue in restrooms that are designated for male use than those that are designated for female use.[74]

According to a research article by Olga Gershenson of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, restrooms have always been an issue for one group or another. First, women around the world petitioned for the right to their own facilities; next were racial minorities in the US during the time of segregation. After this fight, people with disabilities raised the issue to get fully equipped facilities. That fight ended with changes to building codes to make washroom more accessible. Now the issue concerns transgender and other gender variant people.[75]

The University of Oklahoma continually adds gender-neutral restrooms to their campus to accommodate students who may require use of a less excessively gendered bathroom. (Students that fit under this umbrella may identify as non-heterosexual). As of February 2014, the university had 13 unisex bathrooms.[76] Recently, the university has vowed to include a gender neutral bathroom in all new buildings to be constructed.

Forcing trans / non-binary students to use normative gendered restrooms can stigmatize them daily by singling them out.[77]

There are over 150 college campuses across the US that are creating gender-neutral restrooms.[78] In March 2016, New York City private college Cooper Union moved to remove gender designations from campus bathrooms.[79][80] In October 2016, University of California Berkeley converted several restrooms into gender-neutral washrooms.[81]

In the United Kingdom, all-gender restrooms are sometimes found on university campuses. In early 2013, Brighton and Hove city council introduced unisex toilets, which did not feature the words 'men/gentlemen' or 'women/ladies' (as is traditional), but instead used 'universal symbols'. Other British universities including Bradford Union, Sussex and Manchester, have already or are in the process of building unisex facilities.[82]

Advocacy examples

Some toilets use a combined gender symbol to indicate a gender-neutral or transgender-friendly bathroom.

Canada

In April 2014, the Vancouver Park Board decided to install all-gender restrooms in public buildings, with different signs to identify them. Amongst the options discussed was the rainbow triangle (based on the pink triangle used during the Holocaust), an 'all-inclusive' gender symbol, an icon representing a toilet or the phrases 'washroom' or 'gender-neutral washroom' placed on the entrances to the toilets. According to Global News, a Canadian online newspaper, many different regions across Canada offer unisex toilets and other gender-neutral facilities, but Vancouver was the first municipality to change building codes to require unisex toilets be built in public buildings. This movement, according to commissioner Trevor Loke, was aimed to make everyone feel welcomed and included: "We think that the recommendation of universal washrooms is a good idea [...] [w]e will be using more inclusive language based on the BC Human Rights Code." Some initiatives to make washrooms more diverse and inclusive have focused on language simply by using the phrases 'washroom' or 'gender-neutral washroom' in order to be inclusive of all genders and gender identities, or using specifically geared language such as 'women and trans women' as opposed to just 'women' (and vice versa for men and trans men).[1][2]

Private companies

In March 2017 Yelp announced that they will add a gender neutral toilet finder feature on their app. Yelp was one of over 50 companies that signed a 'friend-of-the-court' amicus brief in favor of a transgender high school student Gavin Grimm who claims that his school board denied him access to the boys' bathroom in school and thereby violating Title IX. HRC President Chad Griffin stated on the brief that, "These companies are sending a powerful message to transgender children and their families that America’s leading businesses have their backs,”[83][84]

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Unisex toilet signs.

References

  1. ^ a b Judd, Amy. "Vancouver Park Board votes to install gender-neutral washrooms". globalnews.ca. Global News. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  2. ^ a b Judd, Amy. "Vancouver Park Board asking for input on universal washrooms and signage". globalnews.ca. Global News. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  3. ^ Roberts, Rachel (21 March 2014). "Unisex toilets in schools should be avoided at all costs". independent.co.uk. London: The Independent. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  4. ^ a b Ring, Trudy (September 29, 2016). "California Adopts Groundbreaking All-Gender Restroom Access Law". Advocate. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  5. ^ Anthony, Kathryn H.; Dufresne, Meghan (2007-02-01). "Potty Parity in Perspective: Gender and Family Issues in Planning and Designing Public Restrooms". Journal of Planning Literature. 21 (3): 267–294. doi:10.1177/0885412206295846. ISSN 0885-4122.
  6. ^ Bellware, Kim. "Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Are Quietly Becoming The New Thing At Colleges". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 27, 2016.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Herman, Jody (June 2013). "Gendered Restrooms and Minority Stress: The Public Regulation of Gender and Its Impact on Transgender People's Lives" (PDF). Journal of Public Management & Social Policy. 19 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 22, 2016.
  8. ^ Molotch, Harvey; Noren, Laura, eds. (2010). Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. New York: NYU Press.
  9. ^ Penner, Barbara (2013). Bathroom. Reaktion Books.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Kogan, Terry (2007). "Sex-Separation in Public Restrooms: Law, Architecture, and Gender". Michigan Journal of Gender and Law. 14: 1–57.
  11. ^ "The Weird History of Gender-Segregated Bathrooms". Live Science. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
  12. ^ Greed, Clara. Inclusive Urban Design: Public Toilets. Routledge, 2007.
  13. ^ a b Nirta, Caterina (2014-08-03). "Trans Subjectivity and the Spatial Monolingualism of Public Toilets". Law and Critique. 25 (3): 271–288. doi:10.1007/s10978-014-9141-9. ISSN 0957-8536.
  14. ^ Penner, Barbara (2013). Bathroom. Reaktion Books. p. 69.
  15. ^ Suk, Jeannie (January 25, 2016). "Who's Afraid of Gender-Neutral Bathrooms?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on November 18, 2016.
  16. ^ Norbert Elias: Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Band 1: Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den weltlichen Oberschichten des Abendlandes (LXXXI, 333 S.) / Band 2: Wandlungen der Gesellschaft: Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation (491 S.), Basel: Verlag Haus zum Falken, 1939
  17. ^ Barbara Penner, 2001: A world of unmentionable suffering: Women's public conveniences in Victorian London
  18. ^ a b c Kogan, Terry (2010). "7 Sex Separation". In Molotch, Harvey (ed.). Toilet. NYU Press.
  19. ^ a b Massachusetts (State). Legislature. General Court. 1887 Chap. 0183. An Act to Secure Proper Sanitary Provisions in Factories and Workshops. State Library of Massachusetts. http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/83308
  20. ^ More, Alex. “Coming Out of the Water Closet: The Case Against Sex Segregated Bathrooms.” Texas Journal of Women & the Law 17.2 (2008): 297–315. Print.
  21. ^ Frank, Gillian (November 10, 2015). "The Anti-Trans Bathroom Nightmare Has Its Roots in Racial Segregation". Slate. Archived from the original on December 3, 2016.
  22. ^ Godfrey, Phoebe (2003). "Bayonets, Brainwashing, and Bathrooms: The Discourse of Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Desegregation of Little Rock's Central High". The Arkansas Historical Quarterly. 62 (1): 42–67. doi:10.2307/40023302.
  23. ^ Weyeneth, Robert R. (2005). "The Architecture of Racial Segregation: The Challenges of Preserving the Problematical Past". The Public Historian. 27 (4): 11–44.
  24. ^ a b Plaskow, Judith. “EMBODIMENT, ELIMINATION, AND THE ROLE OF TOILETS IN STRUGGLES FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE.” CrossCurrents 58.1 (2008): 51–64. Print.
  25. ^ Cavanagh, Sheila (2010). Queering Bathrooms: Gender, Sexuality, And the Hygienic Imagination. University of Toronto Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-4426-4154-9.
  26. ^ "Why a 1920s legal move is responsible for the gender-segregated bathrooms we have today". Public Radio International. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  27. ^ Hesse, Monica (2016-04-01). "How the bathroom became a political battleground for civil rights". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2017-03-04. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  28. ^ More, Alex. “Coming Out of the Water Closet: The Case Against Sex Segregated Bathrooms.” Texas Journal of Women & the Law 17.2 (2008): 297–315. Print.
  29. ^ a b Penner, Barbara. Bathroom. Reaktion Books, 2013.
  30. ^ a b Werner, Marcus (9 August 2017). "Berlins Pissoire für Frauen: ein gutes 'Geschäfts-Modell'?". WirtschaftsWoche.
  31. ^ a b c Holley, Peter (26 May 2016). "One Texan's solution to the transgender bathroom battle: 'All-gender urinals'". The Washington Post.
  32. ^ "Alamo Drafthouse founder proposes gender-neutral bathroom design". Fox News. 25 May 2016.
  33. ^ "Six steps to stop violence against schoolgirls, Document ACT 77/008/2007". Amnesty International. November 2007. Retrieved 2009-02-27.
  34. ^ "China gives unisex loos warm reception". Retrieved 2017-04-11.
  35. ^ "30 Beijing locations embrace China NGO's unisex bathroom campaign". English Sina. June 16, 2016. Retrieved April 19, 2017.
  36. ^ Mahapatral, Dhananjay (15 April 2014). "Supreme Court recognizes transgenders as 'third gender'". The Times of India. Retrieved 28 April 2017. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  37. ^ a b "India court recognises transgender people as third gender". BBC New. 15 April 2014. Retrieved 28 April 2017. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  38. ^ ""Unnatural Offenses" Obstacles to Justice in India Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity" (PDF). ICJ. February 2017. Retrieved 28 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  39. ^ Agrawal, Sneha (April 15, 2017). "Transfixed on toilets: India under fire for not creating gender-neutral public washrooms for transgender residents". Daily Mail. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
  40. ^ Crowell, Todd (3 October 2016). "WHY JAPANESE BUSINESSES ARE EMBRACING THE LGBT COMMUNITY". South China Morning Post. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  41. ^ Jenkins, Aric (2 March 2017). "Toilets for All Genders Are Coming to the Olympics in Japan". The Times. Retrieved 27 April 2017. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  42. ^ a b Knight, Kyle (2012-05-02). "Nepal Flushes Out Genderism". Huffington Post. Retrieved 2017-03-14.
  43. ^ "Being LGBT in Asia Nepal Country Report" (PDF). US Aid. 2014. Retrieved 28 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  44. ^ "THAILAND: THE TALE OF THE PINK TOILET - TRANSGENDER RIGHTS IN THAILAND". Out Right Action International. November 3, 2008. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
  45. ^ Beech, Hannah (7 July 2008). "Where the 'Ladyboys' Are". Times. Retrieved 26 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  46. ^ Levon, Erez (2016). Language, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press. p. 192.
  47. ^ Brown, Elizabeth (11 April 2014). "The Biggest Obstacle to Gender Neutral Bathrooms? Building Codes". Reason. Retrieved 25 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  48. ^ "The Biggest Obstacle to Gender Neutral Bathrooms? Building Codes". Reason.com. 2014-04-11. Retrieved 2017-04-27.
  49. ^ "Laws Enforced by EEOC." Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-22. Retrieved 2015-04-24. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  50. ^ "Understanding Transgender Access Laws". The New York Times. 24 February 2017. Retrieved 27 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  51. ^ Steinmetz, Katy. "Feds Say Transgender Students' Gender Identity Must Be Respected." Time, 2014-12-03. Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-08. Retrieved 2016-03-22. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  52. ^ United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration. "Interpretation of 29 CFR 1910.141(c)(1)(i): Toilet Facilities." Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-24. Retrieved 2016-03-22. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  53. ^ Steinmetz, Katy. "The Gender-Neutral Bathroom Revolution Is Growing." Time. 2016-01-11. Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-19. Retrieved 2016-03-22. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  54. ^ "California: Unisex restrooms required by new single-stall law". The Mercury News. 30 September 2016. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
  55. ^ National Center for Transgender Equality. "Take Action Against Anti-Trans Legislation Now!" Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2016-03-22. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  56. ^ Human Rights Campaign. "Restroom Access for Transgender Employees." Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-25. Retrieved 2016-03-22. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  57. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-21. Retrieved 2016-10-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  58. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-10-12. Retrieved 2016-10-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  59. ^ "Bill Text - AB-1732 Single-user restrooms". Retrieved 2017-02-09.
  60. ^ "Gender-neutral bathrooms, high-quality ethnic studies class and other changes coming to California schools". Los Angeles Times. 2016-10-04. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
  61. ^ "Should men's restrooms have diaper changing tables? New bill says yes". Retrieved 6 July 2014.
  62. ^ Senate Floor Analyses http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1358#
  63. ^ Jerry Brown vetoes bills to help men change baby diapers Sacramento Bee. SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article2610428.html
  64. ^ SB-1358 Baby diaper changing stations http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1358
  65. ^ CNN, Joe Sterling, Eliott C. McLaughlin and Joshua Berlinger. "U.S., North Carolina file lawsuits over bathroom bill in transgender rights fight". CNN. Retrieved 2017-04-18. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  66. ^ a b Boegel, Ellen (May 3, 2016). "'Bathroom Wars' are revealing a deep societal divide and the need for reasoned use of political power". American Magazine. Retrieved April 18, 2017.
  67. ^ Left, Lisa (22 February 2016). "The fight over transgender rights in school restrooms intensifies". PBS. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  68. ^ Caitlin Emma (2016-05-12). "Obama administration releases directive on transgender rights to school bathrooms". Politico.
  69. ^ "Donald Trump revokes Barack Obama guidelines on transgender bathrooms". The Telegraph. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
  70. ^ Simpson, Jane. "School gets unisex toilets - but for whose convenience?". Mail on Sunday. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  71. ^ Blackley, Michael (21 June 2015). "Loo-sing the plot? Now all new schools will have unisex toilets". Mail on Sunday. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  72. ^ Yorke, Harry (March 6, 2017). "No more separate boys' and girls' toilets at primary schools in Glasgow to help pupils who are 'confused about their gender'". The Telegraph. Retrieved April 22, 2017.
  73. ^ Bellware, Kim (18 July 2014). "Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Are Quietly Becoming The New Thing At Colleges". huffingtonpost.com. The Huffington Post. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  74. ^ Beemyn, Genny. "Gender-Neutral Restrooms" (PDF). umass.edu. Stonewall Center, University of Massachusetts. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  75. ^ Gershenson, Olga (2010). "The Restroom Revolution: Unisex toilets and campus politics" (PDF). In Molotch, Harvey; Norén, Laura (eds.). Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. New York City: New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-6120-5.
  76. ^ "Gender-neutral restrooms create a safe place for all people". OUDaily.com. Retrieved 2015-10-23.
  77. ^ Bellware, Kim (18 July 2014). "Gender-Neutral Bathrooms Are Quietly Becoming The New Thing At Colleges". Huffington Post. Retrieved 27 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  78. ^ "Gender-Neutral Restrooms" (PDF). University of Massachusetts Stonewall Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
  79. ^ "RESTROOM SIGNAGE".
  80. ^ Redden, Molly (29 March 2016). "New York college moves to strip gender markings from all bathrooms". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
  81. ^ "Campus moves forward on gender-inclusive restrooms".
  82. ^ Cavanagh, Sheila (July–August 2011). "You are where you urinate". The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide. 18 (4): 18.
  83. ^ "Yelp to help people find gender-neutral bathrooms". BBC News. 3 March 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  84. ^ Dickey, Megan (3 March 2017). "Yelp is making it possible to find businesses with gender-neutral bathrooms". Techcrunch. Retrieved 25 April 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
Library resources about
Unisex public toilet
The offline app allows you to download all of Wikipedia's medical articles in an app to access them when you have no Internet.
Wikipedia's health care articles can be viewed offline with the Medical Wikipedia app.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unisex_public_toilet&oldid=840669668"