Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
→Clerk notes: notifed |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
=== Clerk notes === |
=== Clerk notes === |
||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
||
*Notified the two non-permanently blocked users. <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-variant:caps;">[[User:Kharkiv07|<span style="color:black">Kharkiv07</span>]] ([[User talk:Kharkiv07|<span style="color: black">T</span>]])</span> 23:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
=== Power Rangers Articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0> === |
=== Power Rangers Articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0> === |
||
Revision as of 23:13, 4 July 2016
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rangers Articles | 4 July 2016 | {{{votes}}} |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral) | Motion | (orig. case) | 17 August 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Power Rangers Articles
Initiated by Wikistormy (talk) at 22:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Wikistormy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- BuickCenturyDriver (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification Bbb23]
- [diff of notification BuickCenturyDriver]
- [diff of notification Gogo Dodo]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by Wikistormy
I am writing this to request an investigation into a recent edit war. The admin users bbb23 & Gogo Dodo have been warring with who they believe is an editor that was blocked over 3 years ago. The edit war has gotten to the point that any attempt to edits or create an article related to the upcoming TV show Power Rangers Ninja Steel results in getting blocked indef. I've requested that Bbb23 (talk · contribs) present any evidence how the users he/she blocked for editing the power rangers are connected to blocked user BuickCenturyDriver (talk · contribs) but he/she has not done so. A look into buickcenturydrivers edit history shows no edits to the Power Rangers wikiproject which make the recent edit warring unjustified.
Statement by Bbb23
Statement by BuickCenturyDriver
This user was blocked 3 years ago, but his most recent proven talk edit is here. Wikistormy (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Statement by Gogo Dodo
Statement by Blackmane
Well, this doesn't look suspicious at all now does it? An account that is barely 6 months old, with 18 edits, and filing an Arbcom request, basically as a proxy for a long blocked editor. Blackmane (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
- Notified the two non-permanently blocked users. Kharkiv07 (T) 23:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Power Rangers Articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)