Reuse of human excreta: Difference between revisions
m →Nitrate pollution: Task 1i: Fix CS1 deprecated date parameter errors |
→Characteristics of excreta-based fertiliser: improved the link to treatment before reuse |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
For example in the case of [[urine-diverting dry toilets]] (UDDTs) secondary treatment of dried faeces can be uperformed at community level rather than at household level and can include [[thermophilic composting]] where faecal material is composted at over 50 °C, prolonged storage with the duration of 1.5 to two years, chemical treatment with ammonia from urine to inactivate the pathogens, [[solar sanitation]] for further drying or heat treatment to eliminate pathogens.<ref name=":1" /><ref>Niwagaba, C. B. (2009). [http://www.susana.org/en/resources/library/details/703 Treatment technologies for human faeces and urine.] PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden</ref> |
For example in the case of [[urine-diverting dry toilets]] (UDDTs) secondary treatment of dried faeces can be uperformed at community level rather than at household level and can include [[thermophilic composting]] where faecal material is composted at over 50 °C, prolonged storage with the duration of 1.5 to two years, chemical treatment with ammonia from urine to inactivate the pathogens, [[solar sanitation]] for further drying or heat treatment to eliminate pathogens.<ref name=":1" /><ref>Niwagaba, C. B. (2009). [http://www.susana.org/en/resources/library/details/703 Treatment technologies for human faeces and urine.] PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden</ref> |
||
== |
== Fertiliser characteristics of excreta == |
||
=== Urine === |
=== Urine === |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
== Health and environmental aspects == |
== Health and environmental aspects == |
||
=== Pathogens === |
=== Pathogens === |
||
⚫ | Exposure by farm workers to untreated excreta constitute a significant health risk due to its [[pathogen]] content. This risk also extends to consumers of crops fertilised with untreated excreta. Therefore, excreta need to be appropriately treated before reuse and health aspects need to be managed for all reuse applications as the excreta can contain [[pathogens]] even after treatment. |
||
==== Risk management ==== |
|||
⚫ | Exposure by farm workers to untreated excreta constitute a significant health risk due to its [[pathogen]] content. This risk also extends to consumers of crops fertilised with untreated excreta. Therefore, excreta need to be appropriately treated before reuse, and health aspects need to be managed for all reuse applications as the excreta can contain [[pathogens]] even after treatment. |
||
==== Treatment of excreta for pathogen removal ==== |
|||
The treatment of excreta and wastewater for pathogen removal can take place: |
|||
* at the toilet itself (for example urine collected from [[urine-diverting dry toilets]] is often treated by simple storage at the household level); or |
|||
* at a semi-centralised level for example by [[composting]]; or |
|||
* at a fully centralised level at [[sewage treatment plants]] and [[sewage sludge treatment|sewage sludge treatment plants]]. |
|||
==== Indicator organisms ==== |
|||
As an [[indicator organism]] in reuse schemes, [[helminth]] eggs are commonly uses as these organisms are the most difficult to destroy in most treatment processes. The multiple barrier approach is recommended where e.g. lower levels of treatment may be acceptable when combined with other post-treatment barriers along the [[sanitation]] chain.<ref name=":2" /> |
As an [[indicator organism]] in reuse schemes, [[helminth]] eggs are commonly uses as these organisms are the most difficult to destroy in most treatment processes. The multiple barrier approach is recommended where e.g. lower levels of treatment may be acceptable when combined with other post-treatment barriers along the [[sanitation]] chain.<ref name=":2" /> |
||
Revision as of 13:38, 9 February 2015
Reuse of excreta (alternative spelling: re-use) refers to the safe use of human excreta, i.e. faeces (feces) and urine, or animal excreta primarily as soil conditioner and fertilizer in agriculture, gardening or aquaculture, although other uses are possible as well (e.g. as building material, for biofuel production). Some sources call this practice "use of excreta" rather than "reuse" as strictly speaking it is the first use of excreta, not a second use. Reuse of excreta is one example of resource recovery of the resources contained in excreta, mainly the plant-available nutrients nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium as well as micronutrients such as sulphur and organic matter.
These resources which are contained in wastewater, excreta and greywater have traditionally been reused in agriculture in many countries and are still being reused in agriculture to this day, but the practice is often carried out in an unregulated and unsafe manner for example in many developing countries (e.g. Mexico, India, Bangladesh, Ghana). The WHO Guidelines from 2006 have set up a framework how this reuse can be done safely by following a multiple barrier approach.[1] Reuse of sanitised excreta in agriculture has also been called a "closing the loop" approach for sanitation and agriculture and is central to the ecological sanitation approach.
Reuse of excreta is the final step of the sanitation chain which starts with collection of excreta (by use of toilets) and continues with transport and treatment (wastewater treatment is one example) all the way to either disposal or reuse.[2]
Excreta-based fertilisers vary in their general properties and fertilising characteristics and include the following types: Urine, dried faeces, composted faeces, faecal sludge (septage), municipal wastewater, sewage sludge and animal manure.
Background: Multiple barrier concept
Research into how to make reuse of urine and faeces safe in agriculture was carried out in Sweden since the 1990s.[3] In 2006 the World Health Organisation (WHO) provided guidelines on safe reuse of wastewater, excreta and greywater.[1] The multiple barrier concept to reuse, which is the key cornerstone of this publication, has led to a clear understanding on how excreta reuse can be done safely.
The degree of treatment required for excreta-based fertilisers before they can safely be used in agriculture depends on a number of factors. It mainly depends on which other barriers will be put in place according to the multiple barrier concept. Such barriers might be selecting a suitable crop, farming methods, methods of applying the fertiliser, education and so forth.[4]
For example in the case of urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) secondary treatment of dried faeces can be uperformed at community level rather than at household level and can include thermophilic composting where faecal material is composted at over 50 °C, prolonged storage with the duration of 1.5 to two years, chemical treatment with ammonia from urine to inactivate the pathogens, solar sanitation for further drying or heat treatment to eliminate pathogens.[5][6]
Fertiliser characteristics of excreta
Urine
Urine contains large quantities of nitrogen (mostly as urea), as well as significant quantities of dissolved phosphates and potassium, the main macronutrients required by plants. The nutrient concentrations in urine vary with diet.[3]
Undiluted urine can chemically burn the roots of some plants which is way it is usually applied diluted with water, which also reduces odour development during application.[4] When diluted with water (at a 1:5 ratio for container-grown annual crops with fresh growing medium each season,[7] or a 1:8 ratio for more general use[8]), it can be applied directly to soil as a fertilizer. The fertilization effect of urine has been found to be comparable to that of commercial fertilizers with an equivalent NPK rating.[9] Conversely, concentrations of heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, commonly found in solid human waste, are much lower in urine.
The more general limitations to using urine as fertilizer then depend mainly on the potential for buildup of excess nitrogen (due to the high ratio of that macronutrient),[7] and inorganic salts such as sodium chloride, which are also part of the wastes excreted by the renal system. The degree to which these factors impact the effectiveness depends on the term of use, salinity tolerance of the plant, soil composition, addition of other fertilizing compounds, and quantity of rainfall or other irrigation.
Urine can also be used safely as a source of complementary nitrogen in carbon-rich compost.[8]
Urine typically contains 70% of the nitrogen and more than half the phosphorus and potassium found in urban waste water flows, while making up less than 1% of the overall volume. Human urine can be collected with sanitation systems that utilise urinals or urine diversion toilets. Thus far, source separation, or urine diversion systems have been implemented in South Africa, China, Sweden and many other countries. Since about 2011, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is providing research funding sanitation systems that recover the nutrients in urine.[10]
"Urine management" is a relatively new way of closing the cycle of agricultural nutrient flows (also called ecological sanitation or ecosan) and - possibly - reducing sewage treatment costs and ecological consequences such as eutrophication resulting from the influx of nutrient rich effluent into aquatic or marine ecosystems.[11] The risks of using urine as a natural source of agricultural fertilizer are generally regarded as negligible or acceptable. In fact, some research has shown that there are potentially more environmental problems and a higher energy consumption when urine is treated as part of sewage in wastewater treatment plants compared with when it is used undiluted as a resource.[12]
It is unclear whether source separation, urine diversion, and on-site urine treatment can be made cost effective; nor whether required behavioral changes would be regarded as socially acceptable, as the largely successful trials performed in Sweden may not readily generalize to other industrialized societies.[9] In developing countries the use of whole raw sewage (night soil) has been common throughout history, yet the application of pure urine to crops is rare. Increasingly there are calls for urine's use as a fertilizer, such as a Scientific American article "Human urine is an effective fertilizer".[13]
If urine is to be collected for use as a fertiliser in agriculture, then the easiest method of doing so is (in increasing order of costs) by using waterless urinals, urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) or urine diversion flush toilets.[1]
Dried faeces
Reuse of dried faeces (feces) from urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) after post-treatment can result in increased crop production through fertilizing effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and improved soil fertility through organic carbon.[5]
Composted faeces
Compost derived from composting toilets (where organic kitchen waste is in some cases also added to the composting toilet), has in principal the same uses as compost derived from other organic waste products, such as sewage sludge or municipal organic waste. One limiting factor may be legal restrictions due to the possibility that pathogens remain in the compost. In any case, the use of compost from composting toilets in one's own garden can be regarded as safe and is the main method of use for compost from composting toilets. Hygienic measures for handling of the compost must be applied by all those people who are exposed to it, e.g. wearing gloves and boots.
Some of the urine will be part of the compost, although some urine will be lost via leachate and evaporation. Urine can contain up to 90 percent of the nitrogen, up to 50 percent of the phosphorus, and up to 70 percent of the potassium present in human excreta.[14]
The nutrients in compost from a composting toilet have a higher plant availability than the product (dried faeces) from a urine-diverting dry toilet.[5]
Faecal sludge
Faecal sludge (also called septage) is defined as "coming from onsite sanitation technologies, and has not been transported through a sewer." Examples of onsite technologies include pit latrines, unsewered public ablution blocks, septic tanks and dry toilets. Faecal sludge can be treated by a variety of methods to render it suitable for reuse in agriculture. These include (usually carried out in combination): dewatering, thickening, drying (in sludge drying beds), composting, pelletisation, anaerobic digestion.[15]
Municipal wastewater
Work by the International Water Management Institute has led to guidelines on how reuse of municipal wastewater (ideally not containing significant industrial wastewater) can be safely implemented in low income countries.[16]
Sewage sludge
The use of sewage sludge as fertiliser is possible but also highly controversial in many countries (USA, some countries in Europe) due to the chemical pollutants, such as heavy metals, it may contain.
Animal manure
Animal dung (manure) has been used for centuries as a fertilizer for farming, as it improves the soil structure (aggregation), so that it holds more nutrients and water, and becomes more fertile. Animal manure also encourages soil microbial activity, which promotes the soil's trace mineral supply, improving plant nutrition. It also contains some nitrogen and other nutrients that assist the growth of plants.
Manures with a particularly unpleasant odor (such as slurry from intensive pig farming) are usually knifed (injected) directly into the soil to reduce release of the odor. Manure from pigs and cattle is usually spread on fields using a manure spreader. Due to the relatively lower level of proteins in vegetable matter, herbivore manure has a milder smell than the dung of carnivores or omnivores. However, herbivore slurry that has undergone anaerobic fermentation may develop more unpleasant odors, and this can be a problem in some agricultural regions. Poultry droppings are harmful to plants when fresh but, after a period of composting, are valuable fertilizers.
Manure is also commercially composted and bagged and sold retail as a soil amendment.[citation needed]
Health and environmental aspects
Pathogens
Risk management
Exposure by farm workers to untreated excreta constitute a significant health risk due to its pathogen content. This risk also extends to consumers of crops fertilised with untreated excreta. Therefore, excreta need to be appropriately treated before reuse, and health aspects need to be managed for all reuse applications as the excreta can contain pathogens even after treatment.
Treatment of excreta for pathogen removal
The treatment of excreta and wastewater for pathogen removal can take place:
- at the toilet itself (for example urine collected from urine-diverting dry toilets is often treated by simple storage at the household level); or
- at a semi-centralised level for example by composting; or
- at a fully centralised level at sewage treatment plants and sewage sludge treatment plants.
Indicator organisms
As an indicator organism in reuse schemes, helminth eggs are commonly uses as these organisms are the most difficult to destroy in most treatment processes. The multiple barrier approach is recommended where e.g. lower levels of treatment may be acceptable when combined with other post-treatment barriers along the sanitation chain.[1]
Pharmaceutical residues
Exreta from humans and farmed animals contain hormones and pharmaceutical residues which could in theory enter the food chain via fertilised crops but are currently not fully removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants anyway and can enter drinking water sources via household wastewater (sewage).[17] In fact, the pharmaceutical residues in the excreta are degraded better in terrestrial systems (soil) than in aquatic systems.[17]
Nitrate pollution
Only a fraction of the nitrogen-based fertilizers is converted to produce and other plant matter. The remainder accumulates in the soil or lost as run-off.[18] This also applies to excreta-based fertilizer since it also contains nitrogen. Excessive nitrogen which is not taken up by plants is transformed into nitrate which is easily leached.[19] High application rates combined with the high water-solubility of nitrate leads to increased runoff into surface water as well as leaching into groundwater.[20][21][22] Nitrate levels above 10 mg/L (10 ppm) in groundwater can cause 'blue baby syndrome' (acquired methemoglobinemia).[23][24] The nutrients, especially nitrates, in fertilizers can cause problems for natural habitats and for human health if they are washed off soil into watercourses or leached through soil into groundwater.[25]
Comparison of excreta-based fertilisers to other fertilisers
Fertilising elements of organic fertilisers are mostly bound in carbonaceous reduced compounds. If these are already partially oxidized as in the compost, the fertilizing minerals are adsorbed on the degradation products (humic acids) etc. Thus, they develop their long-time effect and are usually less rapidly leached compared to mineral fertilisers.[citation needed]
Mineral fertilisers derive from mining and can contain heavy metals. Phosphate ores contain heavy metals such as cadmium and uranium, which reach over mineral phosphate fertilizer in the food chain.[26] This does not apply for excreta-based fertilisers.
In intensive agricultural land use, animal manure is seen more critical as mineral fertiliser as it is often not used as specific as mineral fertilizers and thus the nitrogen utilization efficiency is poor. Animal manure can become a problem in terms of excessive use in areas of intensive agriculture with high numbers of livestock and too few application possibilities on farmlands.
Society and culture
Regulations
Urine use in organic farming in Europe
The European Union (EU) only allows the use of source separated urine in conventional farming, but not yet in organic farming. This is a situation that many agricultural experts, especially in Sweden, would like to see changed[27]
Dried faeces from UDDTs in the U.S.
In the United States, the EPA regulation governs the management of sewage sludge but has no jurisdiction over the byproducts of a urine-diversion dry toilet (UDDT). Oversight of these materials falls to the states.[28][29]
Other uses of excreta
Apart from use in agriculture, there are other possible uses of excreta. For example in the case of faecal sludge, it can be treated and then serve as protein (black soldier fly process), fodder, fish food, building materials and biofuels (biogas from anaerobic digestion, incineration or co-combustion of dried sludge, pyrolysis of faecal sludge, biodiesel from faecal sludge).[15]
References
- ^ a b c d WHO (2006). WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater - Volume IV: Excreta and greywater use in agriculture. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
- ^ Tilley, E., Ulrich, L., Lüthi, C., Reymond, Ph., Zurbrügg, C. Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies - (2nd Revised Edition). Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Duebendorf, Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-906484-57-0.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Joensson, H., Richert Stintzing, A., Vinneras, B., Salomon, E. (2004). Guidelines on the Use of Urine and Faeces in Crop Production. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden
- ^ a b Richert, A., Gensch, R., Jönsson, H., Stenström, T., Dagerskog, L. (2010). Practical guidance on the use of urine in crop production. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Sweden
- ^ a b c Rieck, C., von Münch, E., Hoffmann, H. (2012). Technology review of urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) - Overview on design, management, maintenance and costs. Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany Cite error: The named reference ":1" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Niwagaba, C. B. (2009). Treatment technologies for human faeces and urine. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- ^ a b Morgan, Peter (2004). "10. The Usefulness of urine". An Ecological Approach to Sanitation in Africa: A Compilation of Experiences (CD release ed.). Aquamor, Harare, Zimbabwe. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b Steinfeld, Carol (2004). Liquid Gold: The Lore and Logic of Using Urine to Grow Plants. Ecowaters Books. ISBN 978-0-9666783-1-4.
- ^ a b M. Johansson (2001). "Urine Separation – Closing the Nitrogen Cycle" (PDF). Stockholm Water Company.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ von Muench, E., Spuhler, D., Surridge, T., Ekane, N., Andersson, K., Fidan, E. G., Rosemarin, A. (2013). Sustainable Sanitation Alliance members take a closer look at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s sanitation grants. Sustainable Sanitation Practice (SSP) Journal, Issue 17, EcoSan Club, Austria
- ^ Ganrot, Zsofia (2005). Ph.D. Thesis: Urine processing for efficient nutrient recovery and reuse in agriculture (PDF). Goteborg, Sweden: Goteborg University. p. 170.
- ^ Maurer, M., Schwegler, P., Larsen, T. A. (2003). Nutrients in urine: energetic aspects of removal and recover y. Water Science and Technology, Vol 48, No 1, pp 37–46
- ^ Mara Grunbaum Human urine is shown to be an effective agricultural fertilizer, Scientific American, July 2010. Retrieved on 2011-12-07.
- ^ J.O. Drangert, Urine separation systems
- ^ a b Linda Strande, Mariska Ronteltap, Damir Brdjanovic (eds.) (2013). Faecal sludge management : systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA Publishing. ISBN 9781780404721.
{{cite book}}
:|last1=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Drechsel, P., Scott, C. A., Raschid-Sally, L., Redwood, M., Bahri, A. (eds.) (2010). Wastewater irrigation and health : assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countries (London : Earthscan. ed.). London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-795-3.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b von Münch, E., Winker, M. (2011). Technology review of urine diversion components - Overview on urine diversion components such as waterless urinals, urine diversion toilets, urine storage and reuse systems. Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
- ^ M. Nasir Khan and F. Mohammad "Eutrophication: Challenges and Solutions" in A. A. Ansari, S. S. Gill (eds.), Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences and Control, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7814-6_5
- ^ Roots, Nitrogen Transformations, and Ecosystem Services Annual Review of Plant Biology Vol. 59: 341–363
- ^ C. J. Rosen and B. P. Horgan (9 January 2009). "Preventing Pollution Problems from Lawn and Garden Fertilizers". Extension.umn.edu. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
- ^ "Journal of Contaminant Hydrology - Fertilizer-N use efficiency and nitrate pollution of groundwater in developing countries". ScienceDirect.com. Retrieved 17 June 2012.
- ^ "NOFA Interstate Council: The Natural Farmer. Ecologically Sound Nitrogen Management. Mark Schonbeck". Nofa.org. 25 February 2004. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
- ^ Lynda Knobeloch, Barbara Salna, Adam Hogan, Jeffrey Postle, and Henry Anderson. "Blue Babies and Nitrate-Contaminated Well Water". Ehponline.org. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Self, J.R. (2014). "Nitrates in Drinking Water". www.ext.colostate.edu. Colorado State University Extension. Retrieved 23 July 2014.
- ^ Debra. "Nitrates and watercourses".
- ^ Sylvia Kratz: Uran in Düngemitteln. (PDF) Uran-Umwelt-Unbehagen: Statusseminar am 14. Oktober 2004, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, 2004.
- ^ Håkan Jönsson (2001-10-01). "Urine Separation — Swedish Experiences". EcoEng Newsletter 1.
- ^ EPA 832-F-99-066, September 1999. "Water Efficiency Technology Fact Sheet Composting Toilets" (PDF). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Title 40 - Protection of Environment Chapter I - Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter 0 - Sewage sludge Part 503 - Standards for the use or disposal of sewage sludge". U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
External links
- Documents on reuse of excreta in the library of the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance
- Photos on reuse of excreta in photo database of the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance