System Shock 2: Difference between revisions
Razr Nation (talk | contribs) |
Razr Nation (talk | contribs) →Reception: add from legacy |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
''System Shock 2'' received over a dozen awards, including seven "[[Game of the Year]]" awards by publications, such as [[Game Revolution]] and ''[[USA Today]]''.<ref name="SS2 official awards">{{cite web|url=http://www.irrationalgames.com/shock2/|title=''System Shock 2'' official website|publisher=Irrational Games|year=2005|accessdate=2008-02-18 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080216161753/http://www.irrationalgames.com/shock2/ |archivedate = 2008-02-16}}</ref> Reviews were very positive and lauded the title for its hybrid gameplay, moody sound design, and engaging story.<ref name="Metacritic SS2"/> Despite critical acclaim, the title did not sell well.<ref name="gamesThatSell">{{cite book | title = Games That Sell! | last = Walker | first = Mark | publisher = Wordware Publishing, Inc | year = 2003 | isbn = 978-1-55622-950-3 | page = 193}}</ref> |
''System Shock 2'' received over a dozen awards, including seven "[[Game of the Year]]" awards by publications, such as [[Game Revolution]] and ''[[USA Today]]''.<ref name="SS2 official awards">{{cite web|url=http://www.irrationalgames.com/shock2/|title=''System Shock 2'' official website|publisher=Irrational Games|year=2005|accessdate=2008-02-18 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080216161753/http://www.irrationalgames.com/shock2/ |archivedate = 2008-02-16}}</ref> Reviews were very positive and lauded the title for its hybrid gameplay, moody sound design, and engaging story.<ref name="Metacritic SS2"/> Despite critical acclaim, the title did not sell well.<ref name="gamesThatSell">{{cite book | title = Games That Sell! | last = Walker | first = Mark | publisher = Wordware Publishing, Inc | year = 2003 | isbn = 978-1-55622-950-3 | page = 193}}</ref> ''System Shock 2'' is regarded by critics as highly influential, particularly on [[first-person shooter]]s and the [[survival horror|horror]] genre. In a retrospective article, [[GameSpot]] declared the title "well ahead of its time" and stated it "upped the ante in dramatic and mechanical terms" by creating a horrific gameplay experience.<ref name="GameSpot Greatest Game"/> |
||
Along with ''[[Deus Ex]]'', Sid Shuman of ''[[GamePro]]'' christened ''System Shock 2'' "[one of the] twin barrels of modern FPS innovation," due to its complex role-playing gameplay.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.games.net/article/netten/1/112821/the-10-most-important-modern-shooters/|title=The 10 most important modern shooters|first=Sid|last=Shuman|work=[[GamePro]]|publisher=IDG Entertainment|location=United States|accessdate=2008-06-18|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20110716022452/http://www.games.net/article/netten/1/112821/the-10-most-important-modern-shooters/|archivedate=2007-04-30}}</ref> IGN writer Cam Shea referred to the game as "another reinvention of the FPS genre", citing the story, characters, and RPG system.<ref name="IGNretro">{{cite news|url=http://retro.ign.com/articles/845/845533p1.html|title=Top 10 retro DLC games wishlist|publisher=News Corporation|location=United States|work=IGN|last=Shea|first=Cam|date=2008-01-16|accessdate=2009-02-03}}</ref> The title has been inducted into a number of features listing the greatest games ever made, including ones by [[GameSpy]],<ref name="gamespy greatest">{{cite web|url=http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/july01/top502ase/index3.shtm|title=GameSpy's Top 50 Games of All Time|author=GameSpy Staff|publisher=[[GameSpy]]|date=2001-06-01|accessdate=2008-04-08|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20110525133108/http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/july01/top502ase/index3.shtm|archivedate=2011-05-25}}</ref> ''[[Edge (magazine)|Edge]]'',<ref name="edge best game">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2007/jul/04/edgestop100g|title=''Edge's'' top 100 games – almost certainly not yours|author=Schofield, Jack|publisher=The Guardian|date=2007-07-04|accessdate=2009-03-05|authorlink=Jack Schofield|archivedate=2009-03-18|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20090318145252/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2007/jul/04/edgestop100g}}</ref> IGN,<ref name="IGN top 100 games 2007 SS2">{{cite news|url=http://top100.ign.com/2007/ign_top_game_22.html|title=IGN top 100 game of all time: #22 ''System Shock 2''|author=IGN Staff|work=IGN|publisher=News Corporation|location=United States|year=2007|accessdate=2008-02-14|archiveurl=|archivedate=}}</ref> GameSpot,<ref name="GameSpot Greatest Game">{{cite news|url=http://www.gamespot.com/features/6130956/|title=The greatest games of all time: ''System Shock 2''|author=Shoemaker, Brad|work=GameSpot|publisher=CBS Interactive|location=United States|accessdate=2006-08-22|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20071022085604/http://www.gamespot.com/features/6130956/|archivedate=2007-10-22}}</ref> and ''[[PC Gamer]]''.<ref name="PCGamerGreatest">{{cite news|url=http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=169961|title=''PC Gamer's'' Top 100: 50–01|last=Atherton|first=Ross|work=[[Computer and Video Games]]|publisher=Future Publishing Limited|location=United Kingdom|date=2007-08-13|accessdate=2009-03-03|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20101007050654/http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=169961|archivedate=2010-10-07}}</ref> [[SHODAN]] has proven to be a popular character among some critics, including IGN,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://pc.ign.com/articles/694/694399p1.html|title=IGN Top Ten Tuesday: Most memorable villains|author=IGN Staff|work=IGN|publisher=News Corporation|location=United States|date=2006-05-07|accessdate=2008-02-19}}</ref> GameSpot,<ref name="gamespot shodan">{{cite news|url=http://www.gamespot.com/features/tenspot_villains/page10.html|title=The ten best computer game villains|author=GameSpot Staff|work=GameSpot|publisher=CBS Interactive|location=United States|accessdate=2008-06-11}}</ref> and [[The Phoenix (newspaper)|''The Phoenix'']].<ref name="thephoenix">{{cite web|url=http://thephoenix.com/Boston//RecRoom/24912-20-Greatest-Bosses-in-Video-Game-History-#1-/|title=The 20 greatest bosses in video game history|author=Krpata, Mitch and Stewart, Ryan|publisher=''[[The Phoenix (newspaper)|The Phoenix]]''|date=2006-10-23|accessdate=2008-06-11|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6AYPojgvC|archivedate=2012-09-09}}</ref> |
|||
Many publications praised the title for its open-ended gameplay. With regard to character customization, Trent Ward of [[IGN]] stated the best element of the RPG system was allowing gamers to "play the game as completely different characters", and felt this made each play-through unique.<ref name="IGN SS2 review"/> Erik Reckase writing for Just Adventure agreed, saying “There are very few games that allow you [to] play the way you want”.<ref name="JA ss2 review">{{cite web|url=http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/SS2/SS2.shtm|title=JustAdventure ''System Shock 2'' review|author=Reckase, Erik|publisher=Just Adventure|accessdate=2008-02-16|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080224151808/http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/SS2/SS2.shtm|archivedate=2008-02-24}}</ref> Alec Norands of [[Allgame]] believed the different character classes made the game “diverse enough to demand instant replayability."<ref name="allgame ss2"/> Robert Mayer from ''[[Computer Games Magazine]]'' called ''System Shock 2'' "a game that truly defies classification in a single genre" and ensured that "the action is occasionally fast-paced, it's more often tactical, placing a premium on thought rather than on reflexes."<ref name=cdmag>{{cite news|last=Mayer|first=Robert|title=''System Shock 2'' Review|url=http://cdmag.com/articles/022/060/systems2_review.html|work=Computer Games Magazine|publisher=Strategy Plus, Inc.|accessdate=2012-09-09|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050205020110/http://cdmag.com/articles/022/060/systems2_review.html|archivedate=1999-11-30|location=United States|date=1999-08-19}}</ref> |
Many publications praised the title for its open-ended gameplay. With regard to character customization, Trent Ward of [[IGN]] stated the best element of the RPG system was allowing gamers to "play the game as completely different characters", and felt this made each play-through unique.<ref name="IGN SS2 review"/> Erik Reckase writing for Just Adventure agreed, saying “There are very few games that allow you [to] play the way you want”.<ref name="JA ss2 review">{{cite web|url=http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/SS2/SS2.shtm|title=JustAdventure ''System Shock 2'' review|author=Reckase, Erik|publisher=Just Adventure|accessdate=2008-02-16|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080224151808/http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/SS2/SS2.shtm|archivedate=2008-02-24}}</ref> Alec Norands of [[Allgame]] believed the different character classes made the game “diverse enough to demand instant replayability."<ref name="allgame ss2"/> Robert Mayer from ''[[Computer Games Magazine]]'' called ''System Shock 2'' "a game that truly defies classification in a single genre" and ensured that "the action is occasionally fast-paced, it's more often tactical, placing a premium on thought rather than on reflexes."<ref name=cdmag>{{cite news|last=Mayer|first=Robert|title=''System Shock 2'' Review|url=http://cdmag.com/articles/022/060/systems2_review.html|work=Computer Games Magazine|publisher=Strategy Plus, Inc.|accessdate=2012-09-09|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050205020110/http://cdmag.com/articles/022/060/systems2_review.html|archivedate=1999-11-30|location=United States|date=1999-08-19}}</ref> |
Revision as of 06:34, 11 September 2012
System Shock 2 is a 1999 first-person action role-playing video game for Microsoft Windows. The title was designed by Ken Levine and co-developed by Irrational Games and Looking Glass Studios. Originally intended to be a standalone title, its story was changed during production into a sequel to the 1994 PC game System Shock; the alterations were made when Electronic Arts—who owned the Shock franchise rights—signed on as publisher. System Shock 2 was released on August 11, 1999, in North America.
The game takes place on board a starship in a cyberpunk depiction of 2114. The player assumes the role of a lone soldier trying to stem the outbreak of a genetic infection that has devastated the ship. Like System Shock, gameplay consists of first person shooting and exploration. It also incorporates role-playing system elements, in which the player can develop unique skills and traits, such as hacking and psionic abilities.
System Shock 2 received positive reviews when released, but failed to meet commercial sales expectations. Many critics later determined that the game was highly influential in subsequent game design, particularly on first person shooters, and considered it far ahead of its time. It has been included in several "greatest games of all time" lists. In 2006, Computer and Video Games reported that System Shock 3 may be under development, but conclusive details have not surfaced about its project's status. In 2007, Irrational Games released a self-proclaimed spiritual successor to the System Shock series, entitled BioShock, to critical acclaim and strong sales.
Gameplay
Like in its predecessor, System Shock, gameplay in System Shock 2 is an amalgamation of the role-playing game (RPG) and first person shooter (FPS) genres. The player uses melee and projectile weapons to defeat enemies, while a role-playing system allows the development of useful abilities. Navigation is presented from a first-person perspective and complemented with a heads-up display that shows character and weapon information, a map, and a drag and drop inventory.[6]
The backstory is explained progressively through the player's acquisition of audio logs and encounters with ghostly apparitions.[1] The game begins with the player choosing a career in a branch of the Unified National Nominate, a fictional military organization. Each branch of service gives the player a set of starting bonuses composed of certain skills, though he may thereafter freely develop himself as he chooses. Marines begin with bonuses to weaponry, Navy officers are skilled in repairing and hacking, and OSA agents get a starting set of psionic powers.[7][8]
The player can upgrade his skills through using "cyber-modules", which are obtained as rewards for completing objectives such as searching the ship. Skills are enhanced by spending cyber-modules at devices called "cyber-upgrade units".[7][9] O/S units allow one-time character upgrades to be made (e.g. permanent health enhancement). An in-game currency, called "nanites", may be spent on items at vending machines, including ammunition supplies and health packs. "Quantum Bio-Reconstruction Machines" can be activated and reconstitute the player for 10 nanites if they die in the same area. Otherwise, the game ends and progress must be resumed from a save point.[9] The player can hack devices, such as keypads to open alternate areas and vending machines to reduce prices. When a hack is attempted, a minigame begins that features a grid of green nodes; the player must connect three in a straight row to succeed. Optionally, electronic lock picks, called "ICE-picks", can be found and automatically hack a machine, regardless of its difficulty.[10]
Various weapons can be procured throughout the game, including melee weapons, pistols, shotguns, and alien weapons.[11] Non-melee weapons degrade with use and will break if they are not regularly repaired with maintenance tools.[12] There are a variety of ammunition types, each of which is most damaging to a specific enemy. For example, organic enemies are vulnerable to anti-personnel rounds, while mechanical foes are weak against armor-piercing rounds. Similarly, energy weapons cause the most damage against robots and cyborgs, and the annelid-made exotic weaponry is particularly harmful to organic targets. Because ammunition is scarce, to be effective the player must use it sparingly and carefully search rooms for supplies.[13] The game also includes a research function. When new objects are encountered in the game, especially enemies, their organs can be collected and, when combined with chemicals found in storage rooms, the player can research the enemies and thus improve their damage against them. Similarly, some exotic weapons and items can only be used when researched.[12] OSA agents effectively have a separate weapons tree available to them. Psionic powers can be learned, such as invisibility, fireballs and teleportation.[8]
Plot
The story begins in 2114, 42 years after the events of System Shock. After joining the United National Nominate, the protagonist, Soldier G65434-2, is assigned to the Rickenbacker, a military spacecraft. The Rickenbacker is escorting the Von Braun, an experimental faster-than-light (FTL) starship, on its maiden voyage. Because the Rickenbacker does not have an FTL system of its own, the two ships are attached for the trip.[14] A few months into the journey, the ships respond to a distress signal from the planet Tau Ceti V.[15] A rescue team is sent to the planet surface where they discover strange eggs;[16] these eggs infect the rescue team and integrate them into an alien communion known as the Many. The infectation eventually overtakes both ships.
Due to a computer malfunction, the soldier awakens with amnesia in a cryo-tube on the medical deck of the Von Braun. He is immediately contacted by another survivor, Dr. Janice Polito, who guides him to safety before the cabin depressurizes. She demands that he rendezvous with her on deck 4 of the Von Braun.[17] Along the way, the soldier battles the infected crew members. The Many also telepathically communicate with him, attempting to convince him to join them. After restarting the ship's engine core and purging an elevator shaft, the soldier reaches deck 4 and discovers that Polito is dead. He is then confronted by SHODAN, a female malevolent artificial intelligence that devastated Citadel Station, a fictional space station, in the previous game. It is revealed she has been posing as Polito to gain the soldier's trust.[18]
She mentions that she is responsible for creating the Many through her bioengineering experiments on Citadel Station. The Hacker (protagonist of the original System Shock) ejected the grove that contained her experiments to prevent them contaminating Earth, an act that allowed part of SHODAN to survive the events of the first game. The grove crash-landed on Tau Ceti V. While SHODAN went into forced hibernation, The Many evolved beyond her control.[19] SHODAN tells the soldier that his only chance for survival lies in helping destroy her creations.[20] Efforts to regain control of XERXES, the main computer on the Von Braun, fail. SHODAN informs the soldier that destroying the Von Braun is their only option, but he must transmit her program to the Rickenbacker first.[21] While en route, the soldier briefly encounters two survivors, Tommy Suarez and Rebecca Siddons, who flee the ship aboard an escape pod.[22]
With the transfer complete, the soldier travels to the Rickenbacker and learns both ships have been enveloped by the infection's source, a gigantic mass of bio-organic tissue.[23] The soldier enters the biomass and destroys its core, stopping the infection. SHODAN congratulates him and tells of her intentions to merge real space and cyberspace through the Von Braun's faster-than-light drive.[24] The soldier confronts SHODAN in cyberspace and defeats her. The final scene shows Tommy and Rebecca receiving a message from the Von Braun. Tommy responds, saying they will return and noting that Rebecca is acting strange. Rebecca is shown speaking in SHODAN-like voice, asking Tommy if he "likes her new look", as the screen fades to black.
Development
Development of System Shock 2 began in 1997 when Looking Glass Studios approached Irrational Games with an idea to co-develop a new game.[25] The development team were fans of System Shock and sought to create a game with similar elements. Early story ideas were similar to the novella Heart of Darkness. In an early draft, the player was tasked with assassinating an insane commander on a starship.[26] The title took 18 months to create with a budget of $1.7 million[27] and was pitched to several publishers, until Electronic Arts—who owned the rights to the Shock franchise—responded by suggesting the game become a sequel to System Shock. The team agreed; Electronic Arts became the publisher and story changes were made to incorporate the franchise.[26] The project was allotted one year to be completed, and to compensate for the short time frame, the staff began working with Looking Glass Studio's unfinished Dark Engine, the same engine used to create Thief: The Dark Project.[27]
The designers wanted RPG elements in the game. Similar to Ultima Underworld, another Looking Glass Studios project, the environment in System Shock 2 is persistent and constantly changes without the player's presence.[28][29] Paper-and-pencil role-playing games were also influential; the character customization system was based on Traveller's methodology. In System Shock 2, this design was implemented in the fictional military branches which,[28] by allowing multiple character paths, the player could receive a more open-ended gameplay experience.[30] Horror was a key focus and four major points were identified to successfully incorporate it. Isolation was deemed primary, which resulted in the player having little physical contact with other sentient beings. Secondly, vulnerability was created by focusing on a fragile character, instead of making the player strong. Lastly were the inclusion of moody sound effects and "the intelligent placement of lighting and shadows".[31] The game's lead designer, Ken Levine, oversaw the return of System Shock villain SHODAN. Part of Levine's design was to ally the player with her,[26] but he also believed game characters were too trusting, stating "good guys are good, bad guys are bad. What you see and perceive is real." Levine sought to challenge this notion by having SHODAN betray the player: "Sometimes characters are betrayed, but the player never is. I wanted to violate that trust and make the player feel that they, and not [only] the character, were led on and deceived." This design choice was controversial with the development team.[32]
Several problems were encountered during the project. Because the team comprised two software companies, tension emerged regarding job assignments. Some developers left the project altogether. Additionally, many employees were largely inexperienced, but in retrospect project manager Jonathan Chey felt this was advantageous, stating "...inexperience also bred enthusiasm and commitment that might not have been present with a more jaded set of developers." The Dark Engine posed problems of its own. It was unfinished, forcing the programmers to fix software bugs when encountered. In contrast, working closely with the engine code allowed them to write additional features.[27] Not all setbacks were localized; a demonstration build at E3 was hindered when it was requested all guns be removed from the presentation. This was done in light of then-recent Columbine High School massacre.[31] A demo for the game, featuring a tutorial and a third of the first mission, was released on August 2, 1999.[33] Nine days later, System Shock 2 was shipped to retailers.[34] An enhancement patch was released a month later and added significant features, such as co-operative multiplayer and control over weapon degradation and enemy respawn rates.[5] A port was planned for the Dreamcast, but was subsequently canceled.[35]
Reception
Aggregator | Score |
---|---|
GameRankings | 92%[43] |
Metacritic | 92%[44] |
Publication | Score |
---|---|
AllGame | [36] |
Computer and Video Games | 9.5/10[38] |
GamePro | [39] |
GameRevolution | A[40] |
GameSpot | 8.5/10[2] |
IGN | 9.0/10[1] |
PC Gamer (US) | 95%[41] |
Gaming Age | A-[42] |
System Shock 2 received over a dozen awards, including seven "Game of the Year" awards by publications, such as Game Revolution and USA Today.[45] Reviews were very positive and lauded the title for its hybrid gameplay, moody sound design, and engaging story.[44] Despite critical acclaim, the title did not sell well.[46] System Shock 2 is regarded by critics as highly influential, particularly on first-person shooters and the horror genre. In a retrospective article, GameSpot declared the title "well ahead of its time" and stated it "upped the ante in dramatic and mechanical terms" by creating a horrific gameplay experience.[32]
Along with Deus Ex, Sid Shuman of GamePro christened System Shock 2 "[one of the] twin barrels of modern FPS innovation," due to its complex role-playing gameplay.[47] IGN writer Cam Shea referred to the game as "another reinvention of the FPS genre", citing the story, characters, and RPG system.[48] The title has been inducted into a number of features listing the greatest games ever made, including ones by GameSpy,[49] Edge,[50] IGN,[51] GameSpot,[32] and PC Gamer.[52] SHODAN has proven to be a popular character among some critics, including IGN,[53] GameSpot,[54] and The Phoenix.[55]
Many publications praised the title for its open-ended gameplay. With regard to character customization, Trent Ward of IGN stated the best element of the RPG system was allowing gamers to "play the game as completely different characters", and felt this made each play-through unique.[1] Erik Reckase writing for Just Adventure agreed, saying “There are very few games that allow you [to] play the way you want”.[56] Alec Norands of Allgame believed the different character classes made the game “diverse enough to demand instant replayability."[36] Robert Mayer from Computer Games Magazine called System Shock 2 "a game that truly defies classification in a single genre" and ensured that "the action is occasionally fast-paced, it's more often tactical, placing a premium on thought rather than on reflexes."[57]
Critics described the game as frightening. Game Revolution attested that the game rivaled the terror of Resident Evil 2 and Silent Hill, and felt the game was "brimming with horror”.[40] Computer and Video Games described the atmosphere as “gripping” and guaranteed readers they would "jump out of [their] skin" numerous times.[38] Allgame found the sound design particularly effective, calling it “absolutely, teeth-clenchingly disturbing,”[36] while PC Gamer's William Harms christened System Shock 2 as the most frightening game he had ever played.[41] Drew Ressler from Gaming Age stated that "games like this only come once in a blue moon", elaborating that it "is a total experience, and any fan of first-person shooters, or just great stories, need to have this in their PC game library" and ending up naming it "one of the best PC games of all time."[42]
Many critics found the weapon degradation system to be irritating[58] and members of the development team have also expressed misgivings about the system.[25][59] The RPG system was another point of contention, with GameSpot describing the job system as "badly unbalanced" because the player can develop skills outside their career choice.[2] Allgame felt similarly about the system, saying it "leaned towards a hacker character".[36] On the other hand, Drew Ressler from Gaming Age considered that the difficulty of acquiring cyber modules "gives some great variety" to the gameplay.[42]
Legacy
System Shock 2 has amassed a cult following with fans, many of whom have demanded a sequel.[51] Some fans are active in the modding community where collaborations to update the game's graphics take place. One graphical enhancement mod, entitled Rebirth, replaces many low-polygonal models with higher quality ones.[60] Another mod, the Shock Texture Upgrade Project (SHTUP), significantly increases the resolution of in-game textures.[32] The community at Sshock2, a fan site, have also released a free level editor entitled ShockEd, which is a repackaged version of Looking Glass Studios' own editor.[61][62]
In 2007, 2K Boston/2K Australia—previously (and again, as of January 2009[63]) known as Irrational Games—released a spiritual successor to the System Shock series, entitled BioShock.[64] The game takes place in an abandoned underwater utopian community gone awry through the genetic modification of its populace and shares many gameplay elements with System Shock 2: reconstitution stations can be activated, allowing the player to be resurrected when they die; hacking, ammo conservation, and exploration are integral parts of gameplay; and unique powers may be acquired via plasmids, special abilities that function similarly to psionics in System Shock 2.[65] The two titles also share plot similarities and employ audio logs and encounters with ghostly apparitions to reveal backstory.[66] In BioShock Infinite, Irrational Games will include a gameplay feature called the "1999 Mode", specifically in reference to System Shock 2's release date, where player decisions will have a more permanent and profound impact on gameplay in the same manner as System Shock 2.[67][68]
On January 9, 2006, GameSpot reported that Electronic Arts had renewed its trademark protection on the System Shock name,[69] leading to speculation that System Shock 3 might be under development.[70][71] Three days later, Computer and Video Games reported a reliable source had come forward and confirmed the title's production. Electronic Arts UK made no comment when confronted with the information.[72] PC Gamer UK expanded these rumors further, stating the team behind The Godfather was charged with its creation.[73] Ken Levine, when asked whether he would helm a third installment, replied "that question is completely out of my hands."[74] He expressed optimism at the prospect of System Shock 3,[75] but was also very critical of Electronic Arts' attitude towards development of the game.[76][77] As of September 2012, nothing conclusive has been reported regarding the status of the purported project.
References
- ^ a b c d Ward, Trent (1999-08-20). "IGN System Shock 2 Review". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- ^ a b c Desslock (1999-08-25). "System Shock 2 Review". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2012-09-08.
- ^ Williamson, Colin. "System Shock 2". Allgame. United States: Rovi Corporation. Retrieved 2012-02-09.
- ^ Buchanan, Kym. "Gameplay Analysis of System Shock 2". KymBuchanan.org. Retrieved 2012-02-20.
Kym: Like the original System Shock, it looks and plays like a first-person shooter (FPS), but with integrated role-playing game (RPG) elements and a complex story. Also, the puzzles and interactive environment (including jumping challenges) feel like an adventure game. Finally, SS2 exemplifies survival horror themes and gameplay.
- ^ a b IGN Staff (1999-09-17). "Shock 2 2.0". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ Mackey, Bob (2007-02-05). "Smart Bombs: Beloved games that flopped (page 2)". 1UP.com. United States: IGN Entertainment. Retrieved 2008-04-07.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ a b Gee, James Paul (2004). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 127–135. ISBN 1-4039-6538-2. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
- ^ a b System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. p. 21.
- ^ a b System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. p. 24.
- ^ System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. p. 13.
- ^ System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. pp. 25, 26.
- ^ a b System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. pp. 14, 15.
- ^ System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. pp. 37, 38.
- ^ System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. pp. 31–33.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
Korenchkin: We have picked up a transmission from the surface of Tau Ceti V. I have been in negotiation with Captain Diego of the Rickenbacker and after some... coercion, he's agreed to go planet side as a joint venture. Imagine, this historic mission might even become more historic. First Contact. And who is there to get exclusive rights to all media, patents and land grants? TriOptimum. Miri, I told you this would be worth it.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
Bayliss: After a couple of hours it was... it was like being on a bender... long periods that you couldn't remember... one minute we were in that crater... the next minute we were loading up the shuttle with the eggs... I remember hearing that idiot Korenchkin calling the Von Braun and ordering them to clear off the ENTIRE hydroponics deck. Diego seemed to think this was strange and said, 'Are you crazy, Anatoly?' And Korenchkin smiled and said back to him, 'Oh, Captain... WE are not Anatoly...
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
Polito: Make sure you expend all your cybernetic modules before you leave this area. You don't know when you'll find another upgrade unit. Now, find a way to deck 4.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
SHODAN: I used Polito's image to communicate with you, until we had established trust.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
SHODAN: Thrived, and grew unruly. And now they seek to destroy me. I will not allow that.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
SHODAN: Remember, that it is my will that guided you here; it is my will that gave you your cybernetic implants—the only beauty in that meat you call a body. If you value that meat, you will do as I tell you.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
SHODAN: My creation has run rampant. I demand their extermination. I have no choice but to destroy this starship. We can make our escape in the Rickenbacker, but you must transfer my intelligence to that ship first.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
Siddons: Move it, Tommy... the escape pod is this way!
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
SHODAN: The Many has grown to a massive size. It has wrapped itself around these two ships, preventing their separation.
- ^ Irrational Games (1999-08-11). System Shock 2 (PC). Electronic Arts.
Delacroix: You must understand the stakes here... if SHODAN is left to continue, her reality will completely assimilate ours. Space will become cyberspace and SHODAN's whims will become reality.
- ^ a b GameSpot Staff (2004-10-04). "System Shock 2 retrospective interview". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- ^ a b c Edge Staff (2007-10-07). "The making of... System Shock 2". Edge. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- ^ a b c Chey, Jonathan. "Postmortem: Irrational Games' System Shock 2". Game Developer. No. November 1999. United States: UBM TechWeb. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
- ^ a b IGN Staff (1999-02-09). "Looking Glass prepares to shock gamers again". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- ^ System Shock 2 instruction manual. Electronic Arts. 1999-08-11. p. 40.
- ^ IGN Staff (1999-06-18). "System Shock 2 interview 2". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ a b Park, Andrew. "System Shock 2 retrospective". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive, Inc. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
- ^ a b c d Shoemaker, Brad. "The greatest games of all time: System Shock 2". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on 2007-10-22. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
- ^ IGN Staff (1999-08-02). "System Shock 2 demo released". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ IGN Staff (1999-08-11). "News briefs". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ IGN Staff. "System Shock 2 (Dreamcast)". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
- ^ a b c d Norands, Alec. "System Shock 2 > Review". Allgame. United States: Rovi Corporation. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
- ^ Edge Staff. "System Shock 2 Review". Edge. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-03-29.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
requires|archive-url=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ a b CVG Staff (2001-08-13). "CVG System Shock 2 Review". Computer and Video Games. No. 237. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. p. 70. ISSN 0261-3697. Retrieved 2008-06-24.
- ^ Holmes, Matt (2000-11-24). "GamePro System Shock 2 review". GamePro. United States: IDG Entertainment. ISSN 1042-8658. Archived from the original on 2008-10-05. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
- ^ a b Colin (1999). "System Shock 2 Review". Game Revolution. United States: AtomicOnline, LLC. Retrieved 2008-03-29.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ a b Harms, William (1999). "PC Gamer System Shock 2 Review". PC Gamer. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 2008-03-31. Retrieved 2008-04-08.
- ^ a b c Ressler, Drew. "System Shock 2 Review". Gaming Age. Archived from the original on 2006-05-26. Retrieved 2012-09-09.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 2010-07-15 suggested (help) - ^ "System Shock 2". Game Rankings. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ a b "System Shock 2". Metacritic. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2008-02-14.
- ^ "System Shock 2 official website". Irrational Games. 2005. Archived from the original on 2008-02-16. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
- ^ Walker, Mark (2003). Games That Sell!. Wordware Publishing, Inc. p. 193. ISBN 978-1-55622-950-3.
- ^ Shuman, Sid. "The 10 most important modern shooters". GamePro. United States: IDG Entertainment. Archived from the original on 2007-04-30. Retrieved 2008-06-18.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 2011-07-16 suggested (help) - ^ Shea, Cam (2008-01-16). "Top 10 retro DLC games wishlist". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2009-02-03.
- ^ GameSpy Staff (2001-06-01). "GameSpy's Top 50 Games of All Time". GameSpy. Archived from the original on 2011-05-25. Retrieved 2008-04-08.
- ^ Schofield, Jack (2007-07-04). "Edge's top 100 games – almost certainly not yours". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2009-03-18. Retrieved 2009-03-05.
- ^ a b IGN Staff (2007). "IGN top 100 game of all time: #22 System Shock 2". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-14.
- ^ Atherton, Ross (2007-08-13). "PC Gamer's Top 100: 50–01". Computer and Video Games. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 2010-10-07. Retrieved 2009-03-03.
- ^ IGN Staff (2006-05-07). "IGN Top Ten Tuesday: Most memorable villains". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
- ^ GameSpot Staff. "The ten best computer game villains". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
- ^ Krpata, Mitch and Stewart, Ryan (2006-10-23). "The 20 greatest bosses in video game history". The Phoenix. Archived from the original on 2012-09-09. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
{{cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Reckase, Erik. "JustAdventure System Shock 2 review". Just Adventure. Archived from the original on 2008-02-24. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ Mayer, Robert (1999-08-19). "System Shock 2 Review". Computer Games Magazine. United States: Strategy Plus, Inc. Archived from the original on 1999-11-30. Retrieved 2012-09-09.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 2005-02-05 suggested (help) - ^ Simpson, Dan (October 1999). "System Shock 2". Maximum PC. Vol. 4, no. 10. United States: Future US, Inc. p. 107. ISSN 1522-4279. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|work=
(help) - ^ Fermier, Rob "Xemu" (2004-10-05). "SS2: When Not Enough is Too Much". Blog Harbor. Archived from the original on 2004-10-11. Retrieved 2006-08-23.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 2007-09-29 suggested (help) Rob Fermier was one of the lead programmers working on System Shock 2. - ^ Bramwell, Tom (2003-06-05). "System Shock 2 reborn". Eurogamer. Archived from the original on 2011-05-18. Retrieved 2008-04-07.
- ^ CVG staff (2001-01-27). "It's shocking! A System Shock 2 level editor". Computer and Video Games. United Kingdom: Future Gaming Limited. Archived from the original on 2007-03-09. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
- ^ Saam (2000-08-22). "ShockEd Now Available!". SShock2.com. Retrieved 2009-08-13.
- ^ Juba, Joe (2010-01-08). "The Return of Irrational Games". Game Informer. United States: GameStop Corporation. Retrieved 2010-02-21.
- ^ Kuo, Li C. (2006-05-10). "BioShock preview". GameSpy. Retrieved 2007-05-08.
- ^ Brad Shoemaker and Andrew Park (2006-05-10). "E3 06: BioShock gameplay demo impressions". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
- ^ Gillen, Kieron (2007-12-06). "Bioshock: A defence article". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2008-06-13.
- ^ Phillips, Tom (2012-01-19). "Fan feedback prompts BioShock Infinite 1999 Mode". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
- ^ Onyett, Charles (2012-01-20). "BioShock Infinite Gets Hardcore". IGN. United States: News Corporation. Retrieved 2012-01-20.
- ^ Sinclair, Brendan (January 9, 2006). "EA files System Shock trademark". GameSpot. United States: CBS Interactive. Retrieved 2008-02-14.
- ^ Houlihan, John (2006-01-09). "System Shock revived?". Computer and Video Games. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ DeCarlo, Matthew (2009-01-19). "21 first person shooters you shouldn't have missed". Techspot. Retrieved 2009-02-03.
- ^ Stuart, Bishop (2006-01-12). "System Shock 3 rumours gather pace". Computer and Video Games. United Kingdom: Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-09-13.
- ^ PC Gamer UK Staff (2006). "Eyewitness Undercover". PC Gamer UK.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ GamePro (2007-07-12). "BioShock: Ken Levine talks morality, System Shock 3 possibilities". GamePro. Archived from the original on 2008-09-16. Retrieved 2008-06-14.
- ^ Molloy, Sean (2006-09-01). "Ken Levine: CGW interviews the man behind Irrational from 1UP.com". 1Up.com. United States: IGN Entertainment. Retrieved 2008-06-14.
- ^ Bishop, Stuart (2006-07-31). "Levine: EA 'didn't give a sh*t' about Sys Shock 3". Computer and Video Games. United States: Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-02-17.
- ^ Bramwell, Tom (2006-08-01). "BioShock dev slams EA". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2008-02-17.
External links
- Official System Shock 2 website
- System Shock 2 at the Open Directory Project
- System Shock 2 at the Internet Movie Database
- System Shock 2 at MobyGames