Jump to content

Constance, Duchess of Wodzisław: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:


Assuming that this hypothesis were true, it's easier to explain the title given to Constance in the Papal letter: ''Duchess of Racibórz''. According to some historians, if Constance was the daughter of Wladysław of Opole, the appropriate title for her in this document would be ''Duchess of Opole''.<ref>J. Horwat, ''Piastowie górnośląscy'', [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.</ref> In addition, is hard to believe that Constance, daughter of Wladysław of Opole, could live almost 86 years.<ref>J. Horwat, ''NN'', [in:] ''Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska'', ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 99; compared with J. Horwat, ''Piastowie górnośląscy'', [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.</ref> Another point in favor of the hypothesis about the origin of Constance, is the fact that after the death of Anna of Czersk, Duke Leszek of Racibórz give the district of Wodzisław (Anna's ''Oprawa wdowia'') to Constance,<ref>M. Małecki, ''Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo'', Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 24.</ref> which is more understandable if she was his sister rather than an old paternal aunt. Another argument who supported this view was provided by the archaeological research in the [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] monastery of [[Racibórz]]. The experts founded that in the first half of the [[14th century]], was buried there an approximately 40-year-old woman who died as result of a disease. If this remains belonged to Constance, they proved that her father could be Przemysław of Racibórz.<ref>M. Małecki, ''Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo'', Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 23 and note 111.</ref>
Assuming that this hypothesis were true, it's easier to explain the title given to Constance in the Papal letter: ''Duchess of Racibórz''. According to some historians, if Constance was the daughter of Wladysław of Opole, the appropriate title for her in this document would be ''Duchess of Opole''.<ref>J. Horwat, ''Piastowie górnośląscy'', [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.</ref> In addition, is hard to believe that Constance, daughter of Wladysław of Opole, could live almost 86 years.<ref>J. Horwat, ''NN'', [in:] ''Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska'', ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 99; compared with J. Horwat, ''Piastowie górnośląscy'', [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.</ref> Another point in favor of the hypothesis about the origin of Constance, is the fact that after the death of Anna of Czersk, Duke Leszek of Racibórz give the district of Wodzisław (Anna's ''Oprawa wdowia'') to Constance,<ref>M. Małecki, ''Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo'', Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 24.</ref> which is more understandable if she was his sister rather than an old paternal aunt. Another argument who supported this view was provided by the archaeological research in the [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] monastery of [[Racibórz]]. The experts founded that in the first half of the [[14th century]], was buried there an approximately 40-year-old woman who died as result of a disease. If this remains belonged to Constance, they proved that her father could be Przemysław of Racibórz.<ref>M. Małecki, ''Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo'', Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 23 and note 111.</ref>

===Rule of Constance in Wodzisław===
Following the hypothesis who identified Constance as the daughter of Wladysław of Opole, after she was repudiated by her husband came to Racibórz at the side of her brother Mieszko I and Przemysław. For being in this city supported by this concept, calling the Duchess Constance (ducissa) Raciborska in the papal bull of 22 September 1321, in which Wladyslaw Auschwitz and his wife Euphrosyne received the right to choose his own confessor. The issue is to determine how long it stayed in the Legnica-Brieg Raciborz. According to one view shortly after arrival at her brother Mieszko appointed for life in a princely salary Wodzisław, forming part of the district Raciborski. Another hypothesis assumes that Constance resided until his death in Raciborz Anna of Mazovia (after July 13, 1324), the widow of Przemysław Racibórz, which coordinates the principality before it Wodzisław as his annuity. Then the son of the deceased gave Constance Leszek Wodzisławska earth, while making it easier to explain, in the event that Constance was his sister than an aunt from the father.

During the reign of Constance in the area of its princely there were two significant events. The first of these was the invasion of Casimir the Great in Silesia from June 1345 during the Polish-Czech. Polish troops gained ground adjacent to Constance Pszczyna and Rybnik and obległy Zory. Only the presence of the King of Bohemia John of Luxembourg between Wodzislaw and Fryštát stop the Polish king, before the attack on the headquarters of Constance. The second event was the epidemic of plague, by which perhaps the Duchess Constance had died.

In Wodzisławiu Constance ruled until his death in 1351, of which informs Raciborska Chronicle. Then the heir Piast Racibórz, husband of Anna Raciborska, Nicholas II Opava back wodzisławski principality joined together with the district Raciborska.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 21:44, 19 December 2009

Constance (d. 1351), was a Polish princess member of the House of Piast and sovereign Duchess of Wodzisław Śląski since 1324 until her death.

Her name appears twice in contemporary sources: firstly, in a letter of Pope John XXII dated 22 September 1321, where she is named "Duchess of Racibórz",[1] and secondly in the Chronicle of Racibórz, who give her the title of "Duchess of Wodzisław" (księżną wodzisławską) and mentions her death in 1351.[2] None of this sources showed Constance's parentage. Historians and sources are agreed that she was a member of the Piast dynasty; however, the difficult of establishing who was her father, caused that two theories emerged about her origins.

The first hypothesis[3] states that Constance was the daughter of Duke Władysław of Opole and wife of Henry IV Probus, Duke of Wrocław, who repudiated her after several years of marriage. She moved to Racibórz at the court of her brothers Mieszko I and Przemysław, who given to her the district of Wodzisław as her own Duchy, where she remained until her death. Historians who dispute this theory alleged that Władysław of Opole had a daughter of unknown name, who died shortly after her marriage with Henry IV,[4] or between her repudiation and Henry IV's subsequent marriage.[5]

According to the second hypothesis,[6] based on Constance's titles showed in sources: Duchess of Racibórz and Duchess of Wodzisław, she was the daughter of Duke Przemysław of Racibórz. Certainly she remained unmarried and settled in Wodzisław (who probably was her own independent Duchy) until her death.

Life

Daughter of Władysław of Opole

Problems about her identification

In medieval sources is only known that from the marriage between Euphemia, daughter of Władysław Odonic, Duke of Greater Poland, and Władysław, Duke of Opole, was born a daughter who married with Henry IV Probus, Duke of Wrocław. Any source directly specified her name, and therefore the historiography is divided about this fact and her correct identification in the Piast dynasty. Some historians shares the view that she was Constance of Wodzisław,[7] but the opponents of this idea argue that her name remains unknown.[8] Also, not gained universal approval the hypotheses who argued that Władysław of Opole's daughter was named either Margareta[9] or Grzymisława.[10] In the absence of proper sources who could clarify this matter, all the informations and theories only created more difficulties in resconstructed her life.

Birth

Is unknown the exact birth date of the daughter of Władysław of Opole. The approximate year of birth was established on the basis of one of the two supplications addressed to the Pope, whose credibility are now called into question.[11] In this documents her brothers (considered by historians as the authors of the two complaints) requested an adjournment to their sister's wedding with Henry IV, since they felt that her age wasn't appropriate for a bride. Since the marriage's date was established between 1277-1280, she could born about 1265.[12] Her birth probably took place in Opole, the capital of her father's Duchy, or in Racibórz.[13] By convention, among the offspring of Władysław of Opole and Euphemia of Greater Poland she is placed at the fifth and last child, although it could be older than Przemysław of Racibórz.[14] If her name was Constance, she probably was named after her cousin Constance, daughter of Przemysł I of Greater Poland.[15]

Marriage with Henry IV Probus

Władysław of Opole's daughter was married with Henry IV Probus, Duke of Wrocław. Historians placed the wedding between the second half of 1277 and March 1280,[16] this is, between the six-months of captivity of Henry IV by his uncle Bolesław II the Bald (since 22 July 1277)[17] and the Congress of Vienna. The wedding couldn't take place prior to 1277, because in the description of the events of Henry IV's imprisonment in the Polish-Silesian Chronicle, the Duke of Wrocław is identified as a boy, which would be impossible if he was then married.[18] In the Congress of Vienna was settled the dispute between the Dukes of Wrocław and Opole, proved in a document were Władysław called Henry IV his son-in-law. It's possible that the consolidation of the agreement was just the wedding between Henry IV and Władysław's daughter.[19]

According to one hypothesis,[20] the marriage between the daughter of Władysław of Opole and Henry IV Probus only could took place between 1277-1278. This is based on the following considerations:

In a letter of King Ottokar II of Bohemia to Bruno of Schauenberg, Bishop of Olomouc dated 15 August 1277, the King referred to his allies the Opole Dukes. Since they wanted to arranged a meeting in Racibórz, he request the presence of Duchess Euphemia of Opole and her daughter, calling a Congress to discuss matters relating to the wedding of Władysław's daughter and Henry IV.[21] The treatments of King Ottokar II were explained in his desire to obtain the support of Henry IV and Władysław of Opole in the war against Rudolf I of Habsburg, King of Germany. According to this hypothesis, there is a proof that in the second half of 1277, there was an alliance between the Dukes of Wrocław and Opole. Among the documents issued by Władysław of Opole and his sons, was found an act who provide support for all the plans of Henry IV. This document was issued after the marriage, because there Duke of Opole called Henry IV his son-in-law, and later in 1278, was added a clause that guarantees the obligations of the Duke of Opole with King Ottokar II of Bohemia, who fell on 26 August 1278 in the Battle on the Marchfeld. It's believed that the marriage took place in 1277 after Henry IV regaining his freedom at the cost of gave Bolesław II the third part of his lands, included Środa Śląska and Strzegom (both inherited by Henry IV from his uncle Władysław); at that time, the conclusion of an alliance with the Dukes of Opole was the most favorable for Henry IV. The complains presented to the Pope supported the hypothesis that the wedding took place in Opole, and was chaired by the Bishop of Wrocław, Thomas II Zaremba. Władysław's daughter probably reunited with her husband in Wrocław after she had the proper age to consumated the marriage.

After settling the dispute with Henry IV at the Congress in Vienna in March 1280 Władysław of Opole issued a document,[22] in which he promised to the Duke of Wrocław, his son-in-law, assistance in obtaining the Polish royal crown. This support would be provided with the condition that her daughter (and Henry IV's wife) was also crowned Queen with her husband. Giving into question the credibility of the complains to the Pope, this document suggests the possibility that the marriage between Henry IV and the princess of Opole took place in Vienna in 1280.[23] In 1281 or 1282, Władysław of Opole died. Since then, the relations of Henry IV with the sons of the deceased Duke were completely diferent.[24] At that time, the disputes with his brothers-in-law, his efforts to obtain the royal crown and the apparent barrenness of his wife added further problems to Henry IV's political aspirations.[25]

Repudiation of Henry IV's wife

Almost all the modern historiography universally accepted the view that Henry IV Probus repudiated Władysław of Opole's daughter. It is based on the conclusion that the complainants to the Pope against the Duke of Wrocław's conduct, are the Dukes of Opole, Henry IV's brothers-in-law. According to this hypothesis, the princess of Opole was repudiated by her husband in 1287 at the latest,[26] because between 1287-1288,[27] the Duke of Wrocław married with Matilda, daughter of Otto V the Long, Margrave of Brandenburg.

A detonant for the decision of repudiated his wife, was Henry IV dispute with Bishop Thomas II Zaremba.[28] Expelled from his dominions, the Bishop took refuge in was adopted in Racibórz at the side of Dukes Mieszko I and Przemysław, Henry IV's brothers-in-law. On 18 April 1287 Henry IV formally asked Mieszko I to refuse his help to Bishop Thomas II, under the threat of rupture of their good relations.[29] He said no, but instead offering as an intermediary in the dispute. Despite the adoption of this proposal, Henry IV decided to divorce his wife. Although this move clearly was made against his alliance with the Opole Dukes, the apparent reason for the repudiation was the infertility of his wife, however this fact could be unfounded, because Henry IV's second marriage with Matilda of Brandenburg was also childless. The Dukes of Opole sent to the Pope two complaints requesting the reinstalation of their sister as Henry IV's wife.[30] The waited response never come, certainly because the complaints were sent during the Sede vacante who took place between the death of Pope Honorius IV (on 3 April 1287) and the election of Pope Nicholas IV (on 22 February 1288).

Theories about her death during the 1280s

In modern historiography were found two views, according to which Henry IV's first wife died during the 1280s, before the conclusion of his subsequent marriage with Matilda of Brandenburg. Both hypotheses are opposed to the identification of Wladysław of Opole's daughter as Duchess Constance of Wodzisław.

The first hypothesis[31] states that the Opole princess died probably in 1287 or 1288,[32] shortly before the conclusion of Henry IV's second marriage. One fact who supported this view was in any contemporary source was read anything about the Duke of Wrocław's ventures seeking the annulment of his marriage with Wladysław of Opole's daughter or any other obstacles, with the exception of a close relationship before marrying Matilda of Brandenburg. In addition, sources not showed any problems for Henry IV about an irregular marital status during his efforts to obtain the royal crown.[33] This hypothesis has been challenged by historians. Is noted that the marriage of Henry IV with the daughter of Wladysław of Opole was invalid without a dispensation from the Pope because of a close affinity between husband and wife (the mother of Henry IV, Judith of Masovia, married with Henry III the White as the widow of Mieszko II the Fat, paternal uncle of the Opole princess-.[34] Moreover, in these times, there was still the custom which allowed the dismissal of infertile wives.[35] Thus, an annulment for Henry IV's marriage wasn't needed.

According to another hypothesis,[4] the daughter of Wladysław of Opole wasn't repudiated by her husband, but died shortly after her marriage.[36] This is supported by the fact that as the wife of Henry IV, she is not mentioned in the Genealogy of St. Hedwig, which happened on several occasions with spouses of short-term childless marriages. By contrast, the only reference about the repudiation of Henry IV's wife were two complaints sent to the Pope by two brothers, identified as Wladysław of Opole's sons; in both documents, are described the dismissal of their sister and the exile of the Bishop. Modern historians believed that the complaints are forgeries, based on the following considerations:

The second complaint related that at the time of Henry IV's marriage with the Opole princess, her brothers are minors,[37] a fact who is proved to be false. The first complaint was addressed to Pope Gregory: the only Pope who bears that name during the second half of the 13th century was Pope Gregory X, who died in 1276, before the events reported in the complaints.[38] The contents of both documents shows that the man who dismissed his wife, was the ruler of a foreign language, but both spouses came from the same diocese. Finally, the repudiation of Henry IV's wife wasn't mentioned during his long dispute with Bishop Thomas II Zaremba, who constantly enumerated the Duke's vices.

Daughter of Przemysław of Racibórz

According to another theory,[39] Constance was the daughter of Duke Przemysław of Racibórz and his wife Anna, daughter of Duke Konrad II of Czersk. Probably born before 1307,[40] is understood that she was the youngest child of Ducal couple. She probably named after Constance, Abbess of Trzebnica and daughter of Duke Ziemomysł of Inowroclaw, while her brother, Leszek, was named after Leszek II the Black (Ziemomysł's brother). Constance probably never married. Until her death in 1351 she lived in Wodzisław Śląski, which certainly represented her personal fief.

Assuming that this hypothesis were true, it's easier to explain the title given to Constance in the Papal letter: Duchess of Racibórz. According to some historians, if Constance was the daughter of Wladysław of Opole, the appropriate title for her in this document would be Duchess of Opole.[41] In addition, is hard to believe that Constance, daughter of Wladysław of Opole, could live almost 86 years.[42] Another point in favor of the hypothesis about the origin of Constance, is the fact that after the death of Anna of Czersk, Duke Leszek of Racibórz give the district of Wodzisław (Anna's Oprawa wdowia) to Constance,[43] which is more understandable if she was his sister rather than an old paternal aunt. Another argument who supported this view was provided by the archaeological research in the Dominican monastery of Racibórz. The experts founded that in the first half of the 14th century, was buried there an approximately 40-year-old woman who died as result of a disease. If this remains belonged to Constance, they proved that her father could be Przemysław of Racibórz.[44]

Rule of Constance in Wodzisław

Following the hypothesis who identified Constance as the daughter of Wladysław of Opole, after she was repudiated by her husband came to Racibórz at the side of her brother Mieszko I and Przemysław. For being in this city supported by this concept, calling the Duchess Constance (ducissa) Raciborska in the papal bull of 22 September 1321, in which Wladyslaw Auschwitz and his wife Euphrosyne received the right to choose his own confessor. The issue is to determine how long it stayed in the Legnica-Brieg Raciborz. According to one view shortly after arrival at her brother Mieszko appointed for life in a princely salary Wodzisław, forming part of the district Raciborski. Another hypothesis assumes that Constance resided until his death in Raciborz Anna of Mazovia (after July 13, 1324), the widow of Przemysław Racibórz, which coordinates the principality before it Wodzisław as his annuity. Then the son of the deceased gave Constance Leszek Wodzisławska earth, while making it easier to explain, in the event that Constance was his sister than an aunt from the father.

During the reign of Constance in the area of its princely there were two significant events. The first of these was the invasion of Casimir the Great in Silesia from June 1345 during the Polish-Czech. Polish troops gained ground adjacent to Constance Pszczyna and Rybnik and obległy Zory. Only the presence of the King of Bohemia John of Luxembourg between Wodzislaw and Fryštát stop the Polish king, before the attack on the headquarters of Constance. The second event was the epidemic of plague, by which perhaps the Duchess Constance had died.

In Wodzisławiu Constance ruled until his death in 1351, of which informs Raciborska Chronicle. Then the heir Piast Racibórz, husband of Anna Raciborska, Nicholas II Opava back wodzisławski principality joined together with the district Raciborska.

References

  1. ^ "Constantie Ducisse Ratiboriensi". Ref: Vetera monumenta Poloniae et Lithuaniae, ed. by A. Theiner, Rome 1860, vol. I, p. 170, No 259.
  2. ^ "Anno MCCCLI feria quinta obiit Constantina preclarissima princeps Ladislawiensis". Ref: Ratiborer Chronik [in:] "Zeitschrift des Vereins für Geschichte und Alterthum Schlesiens", ed. by A. Weltzel, vol. IV, 1862, p. 115.
  3. ^ This theory is supported by: J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, pp. 31–32; J. Sperka, Konstancja, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, red. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, pp. 78–79; S.A. Sroka, Konstancja, [in:] Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, red. by K. Ożóg and S. Szczur, Kraków 1999, pp. 728–729. Kazimierz Jasiński treated this as a conjecture; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 542–543, note 3.
  4. ^ a b T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, pp. 27–29.
  5. ^ R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290, [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, pp. 293–294; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 524–526.
  6. ^ This theory is supported by: K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 542–543; M. Furmanek, S. Kulpa, Zamek wodzisławski i jego właściciele, Wodzisław Śląski 2003, pp. 21–22; J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No. 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.
  7. ^ J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, pp. 31–32; J. Sperka, Konstancja, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, pp. 78–79; S. A. Sroka, Konstancja, [in:] Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, ed. by K. Ożóg and S. Szczur, Kraków 1999, pp. 728–729.
  8. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, , Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 524–526 (although he later presented the conjecture of the identification of Władysław of Opole as Constance; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, , Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 542–543, note 3); J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, pp. 45–48 (although he put forward the hypothesis -which later retreated- about the possible name of Władysław of Opole's daughter as Grzymisława, in basis of the Obituary of the St. Vincent Abbey; J. Horwat, Grzymisława, księżniczka opolska, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", vol. VII-VIII, Gliwice 1991–1992, pp. 380–384); T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, pp. 27–29.
  9. ^ Ewa Maleczyńska, Wrocławskie panie piastowskie i ich partnerzy, Wrocław 1966, p. 79. See P. Boroń, Wizerunki Henryka Probusa w historiografii, [in:] Piastowie śląscy w kulturze i europejskich dziejach, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 2007, pp. 353–354.
  10. ^ J. Horwat, Grzymisława, księżniczka opolska, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", vol. VII-VIII, Gliwice 1991–1992, pp. 380–384, identified her with certain Grzymisława, which appears in the Obituary of the St. Vincent Abbey with the title of Duchess of Opole. J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46, rejected this hypothesis, stating that if Grzymisława was the wife of Henry IV Probus she wouldn't styled Duchess of Opole, but Duchess of Wrocław and Silesia.
  11. ^ T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, pp. 27–28.
  12. ^ K. Jasiński fixed the birth of Władysław of Opole's daughter approximately in 1265, because he claimed that her marriage to Henry IV Probus took place between the second half of 1277 and early 1280; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 524; J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich" [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, pp. 31–32, didn't give directly a date of birth. He merely stated that marrying her husband in 1277 or 1278 (probably in the second half of 1277), she was about 10-12 years old, and died in 1351 aged over 84 years. In modern historiography can meet up another date of birth gave to her, about 1256, although without justification; J. Sperka, Konstancja, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 78, and S. A. Sroka, Konstancja, [in:] Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, ed. by K. Ożóg and S. Szczur, Kraków 1999, p. 728.
  13. ^ M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 2, he relied on the findings of J. Tęgowski (although he didn't put this information in their work) and then developed this hypothesis in footnote 3.
  14. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 524.
  15. ^ This view was expressed by K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 542, note 3, presenting this conjecture to identify the daughter of Władysław of Opole from occurring in the 14th century sources of Constance. However, the researcher agreed to the hypothesis given that she was the daughter of Przemysław of Racibórz.
  16. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 524, claimed that the marriage was concluded between the second half of 1277 and early 1280; R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290, [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 286 and note 2, stated that the wedding took place shortly before the conclusion of the agreement between Henry IV and Władysław of Opole in Vienna in March 1280; T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, p. 16, assumed that marriage was most likely peformed at a congress in Vienna in 1280; J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 32, presented the hypothesis that the marriage took place in 1277 or 1278 (probably in 1277). This theory is supported by: J. Sperka, Konstancja, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 78 and M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 4; by contrast S. A. Sroka, Konstancja, [in:] Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, ed. by K. Ożóg and S. Szczur, Kraków 1999, p. 728, reported that Władysław of Opole's daughter was married to Henry IV Probus in 1278.
  17. ^ Date given by: R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290, [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 276.
  18. ^ E. Maetschke, Wann wurde Heinrich IV. von Breslau geboren?, [in:] "Zeitschrift des Vereins für Geschichte und Altertum Schlesiens", vol. LXVI, 1932, p. 61; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part I, p. 161, note 11.
  19. ^ T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, pp. 27–29. See R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 286, note 2.
  20. ^ J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 32.
  21. ^ Ref. R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 277 and note 2.
  22. ^ T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, p. 16, dated the document about 1280-1281, but points out that the made after and released at the congress in Vienna in March 1280; R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, pp. 286–287, argued that the document was issued in 1280 or in the first half of 1281, but accepted that Władysław of Opole died on 27 August or 13 November 1281; J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 31, believed that Władysław of Opole issued this document in 1280; by contrast, J. Horwat, Stosunki między książętami opolskimi a Henrykiem IV Probusem w latach 1278–1288, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", ed. by J. Horwat (red.), vol. VI, Gliwice 1990, p. 11, found that Władysław of Opole this act has yet wasn't made this document by the time of the congress in Vienna.
  23. ^ J. Horwat, Stosunki między książętami opolskimi a Henrykiem IV Probusem w latach 1278–1288, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", ed. by J. Horwat (red.), vol. VI, Gliwice 1990, p. 16
  24. ^ J. Horwat, Stosunki między książętami opolskimi a Henrykiem IV Probusem w latach 1278–1288, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", ed. by J. Horwat (red.), vol. VI, Gliwice 1990, p. 19.
  25. ^ J. Horwat, NN, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 99.
  26. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 524-525; R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 293, dated this event around 1286-1287, although in another place said that it had been before, without giving an exact date (p. 303, ref: K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 525, note 6); J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 31, argued that the dismissal of Władysław of Opole's daughter took place during the first half of 1287; J. Horwat, Grzymisława, księżniczka opolska, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", vol. VII-VIII, Gliwice 1991–1992, pp. 380–384, hypothesized about the identification of Wladyslaw of Opole's daughter as the Grzymisława who appears in the Obituary of St. Vincent Abbey with the title of "Duchess of Opole", claimed that the wife of Henry IV Probus has been dismissed by him around 1282-1284, between the verdict issuing by the Papal Legate Philip in a dispute with the Bishop Thomas II Zaremba (10 August 1282) and its announcement (12 March 1284), after then she returned to Opole, where died around 13 September 1285-1286. Her death allowed Henry IV to intensify his efforts of marrying Matilda of Brandenburg. By the other hand, J. Horwat, Stosunki między książętami opolskimi a Henrykiem IV Probusem w latach 1278–1288, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", ed. by J. Horwat (red.), vol. VI, Gliwice 1990, p. 14; J. Horwat, NN, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 99 and J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46, rejected the hypothesis of Grzymisława identification as daughter of Władysław of Opole, stating that the wife of Henry IV Probus wouldn't styled Duchess of Opole, but Duchess of Wrocław and Silesia. Also, he not quoted or reject the hypothesis of the repudiation of his first wife, by Henry IV between 1282-1284.
  27. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 524-525; J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 45, erroneously relied on K. Jasinski, stating that the marriage of Henry with Matilda has been concluded at the end of 1287. Later (p. 47) he stated that the marriage took place before 11 January 1288, because by a document issued that day, Henry IV mentioned his wife there, Henry, in which Prince mentioned his wife. The document didn't give her name, but there is no doubt that it was Matilda. M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 11, reported that the marriage with Matilda took place by the end of 1287; R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 294 and S.A. Sroka, Konstancja, [in:] Piastowie. Leksykon biograficzny, ed. by K. Ożóg and S. Szczur, Kraków 1999, pp. 728–729, reported that Henry IV married Matilda in 1288.
  28. ^ J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 31; K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 525, doesn't exclude that the dismissal of Henry IV's wife was preceded by the assistance of the Dukes of Opole to Bishop Thomas II.
  29. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 525, found it confusing, although possible, that the friendship between Henry IV and Mieszko I began after the repudiation of his wife (and Mieszko I's sister).
  30. ^ In none of the two complaints were showed the names of the characters from the events described there. Both were relate to a Polish prince, who stepped back from his sister's applicants. The first letter, addressed to Pope Gregory, stated the Duke is also pursued by the expulsion of Bishop's complaint. In the second, brothers inform the Pope that their sister was taken in marriage at a very young age, when they themselves were still minors, and the idea of this marriage was from their father. Modern historiography almost universally accepted the hypothesis that the events described in the complaints are related to Henry IV Probus, Wladysław of Opole's sons and daughter and Bishop Thomas II.
  31. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 525.
  32. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 542-543, note 3, found that the daughter of Wladysław of Opole died in 1287 or early 1288.
  33. ^ J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 45.
  34. ^ J. Tęgowski, Konstancja, "Poczet żon królewskich", [in:] "Magazyn Razem", 1987, No 1, p. 31.
  35. ^ M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 6.
  36. ^ It's possible that the princess of Opole died before 10 August 1282, because at that time was issued a document of the Papal Legate who ended the dispute between Bishop Thomas II Zaremba and Henry IV. By virtue of one of the provisions in the document the Duke could collect the Church tribute from their subjects to cover the cost of his marriage. As the next document included a similar provision for the future children born from the union, is believed that the document maybe related a purely theoretical situation. Ref: T. Jurek, Plany koronacyjne Henryka Probusa, [in:] Śląsk w czasach Henryka IV Prawego (Wratislavia antiqua 8), ed. by K. Wachowski, Wrocław 2005, p. 29. See the article of B. Włodarski in "Kwartalniku Historycznym", Lwów 1928, pp. 622–623. See also R. Grodecki, Dzieje polityczne Śląska do r. 1290 [in:] Historia Śląska od najdawniejszych czasów do roku 1400, ed. by S. Kutrzeba, vol. I, Kraków 1933, p. 293, note 3.
  37. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, p. 524.
  38. ^ J. Horwat, Stosunki między książętami opolskimi a Henrykiem IV Probusem w latach 1278–1288, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum w Gliwicach", ed. by J. Horwat (red.), vol. VI, Gliwice 1990, p. 14. The investigator said that the name of the Pope actually could be inserted in the final editing. Therefore this disagreed with the model of a tipical complaint.
  39. ^ K. Jasiński, Rodowód Piastów śląskich, Second Edition, Kraków 2007, part III, pp. 542-543 and table V/2.
  40. ^ Historiography also ranked her birth around 1305-1306. Ref: M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 2.
  41. ^ J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.
  42. ^ J. Horwat, NN, [in:] Książęta i księżne Górnego Śląska, ed. by A. Barciak, Katowice 1995, p. 99; compared with J. Horwat, Piastowie górnośląscy, [in:] "Rocznik Muzeum Górnośląskiego w Bytomiu. Historia", No 8, Bytom 2007, p. 46.
  43. ^ M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 24.
  44. ^ M. Małecki, Konstancja – księżna wodzisławska i jej księstwo, Wodzisław Śląski 1997, p. 23 and note 111.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constance,_Duchess_of_Wodzisław&oldid=332739185"