User talk:1keyhole: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Civil behaviour: Reply |
←Blanked the page Tags: Blanking Manual revert Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Civil behaviour == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A1keyhole&diff=1150702021&oldid=1150701632&diffmode=source This] is not really acceptable behaviour. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 17:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry but gettinng I am angry cause people aren't listening and I am trying to learn all the rules and proceedure. |
|||
:The result was for page to deleted it wasn't under proceedure if article isn't deleted it is be tagged G6 is that the proccedure? [[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 17:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Once again, I will suggest to you that you work on content and leave tagging pages for deletion until you gain more experience. As I already told you previously, the article was deleted at 09:26, 17 December 2022 by [[user:Liz]] who also closed the AFD. So the article was deleted per procedure. After the actress gained [[WP:N|notability]], the article was created '''after''' the deletion. That article is not eligible for G6, and as [[User:CT55555]] pointed out to you, the article was kept at a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartiki Gonsalves (3rd nomination)|thrd AFD]]. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 17:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::I have plenety of expereince please stop using that coindencing tone in your messages it's rude. |
|||
::: |
|||
:::Since you brought it up My error with MacOS version history - G6 was because someone put in a redirect that cause confusion simple human error that anyone could have made. [[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 17:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::I did not mean it to be condescending, but the fact is that the mistakes you are making are not simple "oops", but are misunderstanding of policy or misunderstanding of process. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 18:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I do understand the policy and proceedure I can give example. |
|||
:::::The result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Ukraine, Bern was to delete in 2013. |
|||
:::::It wasn't carried and there is no increase in notability since the 2013 vote so after that consideration I tagged under G7 for speedy deleteion. [[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 18:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::::ACtually, you tagged it G6, not G7, and I've asked the admin to review their action on that article because the article was deleted after the AFD, and the created years later. G6 is only for a technical deletion where a deletion did not take place after a closure with a delete result. It is not for deleting article created after the deletion was carried out. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 19:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::The issue is not that people are not listening. This issue is your misunderstanding of deletion policy. I echo the suggestion to stop tagging things for deletion until you learn the policy. Also, please be civil. [[User:CT55555|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,Red,Orange,Yellow,Green,Blue,Purple);color:transparent;background-clip:text;-webkit-background-clip:text">'''CT55555'''</span>]]([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 18:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::Okay If you have time please go over the articles for deletion and tell me which are wrong |
|||
:::[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefox version history (2nd nomination)]] |
|||
:::[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Chrome version history (2nd nomination)]] [[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 18:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::What you have done wrong, is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kartiki_Gonsalves&diff=prev&oldid=1150698268&diffmode=source try to speedy delete] an article about an obviously notable [[Kartiki Gonsalves|person]] (she won an Oscar) after [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartiki Gonsalves (3rd nomination)|consensus was reached to keep]] the article. |
|||
::::I don't have an opinion on the two version history things, but as you are seeking feedback, put two square brackets around the links to shortcuts. [[User:CT55555|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;background-image:linear-gradient(45deg,Red,Orange,Yellow,Green,Blue,Purple);color:transparent;background-clip:text;-webkit-background-clip:text">'''CT55555'''</span>]]([[User talk:CT55555|talk]]) 19:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
too add, users attempts to delete almost every article they come across is quickly approching WP:DISRUPTIVE with alot of WP:ICANTHEARYOU when people push back. please calm down with the Afd's and SD's before this ends up at the incidents noticeboard, you are welcome to suggest edits and to raise issues in talk but deletion is a real nuclear option that shouldnt be carelessly used [[User:Popeter45|Popeter45]] ([[User talk:Popeter45|talk]]) 23:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:There is over excessive amount of software, some dedicated to single editions, here is a list of Firefox articles alone. |
|||
:* [[firefox]] |
|||
:* [[firefox 2]] |
|||
:* [[Firefox 3.0]] |
|||
:* [[Firefox 3.5]] |
|||
:* [[firefox 3.6]] |
|||
:* [[firefox 4.0]] |
|||
:* [[Firefox early version history]] |
|||
:* [[Firefox version history]] 11th largest article on Wikipedia according to other editors |
|||
:* [[firefox logo]] |
|||
:* [[Firefox Portable]] |
|||
:[[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 23:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Software can be extensive enough to warrant multiple articles, your arguement would suggest removing the article about the president of the United States as the page about the US already exists [[User:Popeter45|Popeter45]] ([[User talk:Popeter45|talk]]) 00:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== recent page creations == |
|||
recent pages have grammar, spelling, attribution, and formatting that is thoroughly un-encyclopedic. |
|||
you seem enthusiastic, but we would suggest you have someone with a command of the written word to go over your edits. |
|||
thanks again for helping with our encyclopedia, |
|||
[[User:Saintstephen000|Saintstephen000]] ([[User talk:Saintstephen000|talk]]) [[User:Saintstephen000|Saintstephen000]] ([[User talk:Saintstephen000|talk]]) 21:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:I have you read your edit and it's incorrect they didn't using the term school until around the 1980s that is why is I didn't use the word school. |
|||
:If you read the references from 1970s it state secret harbour farm then it changes around late 80s and early 90s. |
|||
:It dosen't sound a nice place if the teenagers were desperate enough to steal firearms and boats in attempt to escape it's lucky no one was seriously injured in these escape attempts. [[User:1keyhole|1keyhole]] ([[User talk:1keyhole#top|talk]]) 21:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
not certain what you're talking about. |
|||
we're speaking specifically to your grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, and general readability. |
|||
a person familiar with English writing norms will need to go over your additions for encyclopedic veracity and style. |
|||
please find a proofreader, or use one of the fine online grammar and spell checks. this will make it so you're not using up other contributors valuable editing time. |
|||
thanks again for trying to help build our encyclopedia, |
|||
[[User:Saintstephen000|Saintstephen000]] ([[User talk:Saintstephen000|talk]]) |