Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 20866331

16:45, 9 April 2018: Rajrajh (talk | contribs) triggered filter 650, performing the action "edit" on Ho rebellion. Actions taken: none; Filter description: Creation of a new article without any categories (examine)

Changes made in edit

==Ho Rebellion==
The Ho and Munda tribesmen of Chhotanagpur challenged the Company’s forces in 1820-22, then again in 1831, and the area remained disturbed till 1837.The tribal inhabitants of Chota Nagpur comprised Kols, Bhils, Hoes, Mundas and Oraons. They led an independent life.

1. In 1820 the king of Porhat owed allegiance to the British and agreed to pay huge taxes annually. He claimed the neighboring Hos region as his own to the consent of the British. He went on to collect taxes from the Ho segment of the Hos which they resented. A few officials were killed too.

The British sent troops in support of the king. The Hos took up traditional arms like bows and arrows to face British troops armed in modern weapons. They put up a very brave fight but had to surrender in 1821.

2. The Hos rose again in 1831. The Chhota Nagpur region was leased out to Hindu, Muslim and Sikh money-lenders for revenue collection. Their oppressive tactics, high revenue rates, British judicial and revenue policies devastated the traditional social framework of the Hos.They gathered under Bir Budhu Bhagat, Joa Bhagat, Jhindrai Manki and Sui Munda. In 1831, Munda and Oraon peasants first took up arms against the British. It encouraged tribals in Singbhum, Manbhum, Hazaribagh and Palamou.

The insurgents adopted most cruel means and spared no one. They torched houses and killed the enemies. Only carpenters and blacksmiths were spared since they made weapons and other useful goods for them. After two years of intense resistance they lost to modern weapons of the British. Thousands of tribal men, women and children were killed and the rebellion was suppressed.<ref>http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule.</ref>
==Reference==

Action parameters

VariableValue
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
175
Name of the user account (user_name)
'Rajrajh'
Age of the user account (user_age)
9674693
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*', 1 => 'user', 2 => 'autoconfirmed' ]
Rights that the user has (user_rights)
[ 0 => 'createaccount', 1 => 'read', 2 => 'edit', 3 => 'createtalk', 4 => 'writeapi', 5 => 'viewmywatchlist', 6 => 'editmywatchlist', 7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 8 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 9 => 'editmyoptions', 10 => 'abusefilter-view', 11 => 'abusefilter-log', 12 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 13 => 'centralauth-merge', 14 => 'vipsscaler-test', 15 => 'ep-bereviewer', 16 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage', 17 => 'reupload-own', 18 => 'move-rootuserpages', 19 => 'move-categorypages', 20 => 'createpage', 21 => 'minoredit', 22 => 'editmyusercss', 23 => 'editmyuserjson', 24 => 'editmyuserjs', 25 => 'purge', 26 => 'sendemail', 27 => 'applychangetags', 28 => 'spamblacklistlog', 29 => 'ep-enroll', 30 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants', 31 => 'reupload', 32 => 'upload', 33 => 'move', 34 => 'collectionsaveascommunitypage', 35 => 'autoconfirmed', 36 => 'editsemiprotected', 37 => 'movestable', 38 => 'autoreview', 39 => 'transcode-reset', 40 => 'skipcaptcha' ]
Global groups that the user is in (global_user_groups)
[]
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
0
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Ho rebellion'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Ho rebellion'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Old content model (old_content_model)
''
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
''
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'==Ho Rebellion== The Ho and Munda tribesmen of Chhotanagpur challenged the Company’s forces in 1820-22, then again in 1831, and the area remained disturbed till 1837.The tribal inhabitants of Chota Nagpur comprised Kols, Bhils, Hoes, Mundas and Oraons. They led an independent life. 1. In 1820 the king of Porhat owed allegiance to the British and agreed to pay huge taxes annually. He claimed the neighboring Hos region as his own to the consent of the British. He went on to collect taxes from the Ho segment of the Hos which they resented. A few officials were killed too. The British sent troops in support of the king. The Hos took up traditional arms like bows and arrows to face British troops armed in modern weapons. They put up a very brave fight but had to surrender in 1821. 2. The Hos rose again in 1831. The Chhota Nagpur region was leased out to Hindu, Muslim and Sikh money-lenders for revenue collection. Their oppressive tactics, high revenue rates, British judicial and revenue policies devastated the traditional social framework of the Hos.They gathered under Bir Budhu Bhagat, Joa Bhagat, Jhindrai Manki and Sui Munda. In 1831, Munda and Oraon peasants first took up arms against the British. It encouraged tribals in Singbhum, Manbhum, Hazaribagh and Palamou. The insurgents adopted most cruel means and spared no one. They torched houses and killed the enemies. Only carpenters and blacksmiths were spared since they made weapons and other useful goods for them. After two years of intense resistance they lost to modern weapons of the British. Thousands of tribal men, women and children were killed and the rebellion was suppressed.<ref>http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule.</ref> ==Reference=='
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -1,1 +1,11 @@ +==Ho Rebellion== +The Ho and Munda tribesmen of Chhotanagpur challenged the Company’s forces in 1820-22, then again in 1831, and the area remained disturbed till 1837.The tribal inhabitants of Chota Nagpur comprised Kols, Bhils, Hoes, Mundas and Oraons. They led an independent life. +1. In 1820 the king of Porhat owed allegiance to the British and agreed to pay huge taxes annually. He claimed the neighboring Hos region as his own to the consent of the British. He went on to collect taxes from the Ho segment of the Hos which they resented. A few officials were killed too. + +The British sent troops in support of the king. The Hos took up traditional arms like bows and arrows to face British troops armed in modern weapons. They put up a very brave fight but had to surrender in 1821. + +2. The Hos rose again in 1831. The Chhota Nagpur region was leased out to Hindu, Muslim and Sikh money-lenders for revenue collection. Their oppressive tactics, high revenue rates, British judicial and revenue policies devastated the traditional social framework of the Hos.They gathered under Bir Budhu Bhagat, Joa Bhagat, Jhindrai Manki and Sui Munda. In 1831, Munda and Oraon peasants first took up arms against the British. It encouraged tribals in Singbhum, Manbhum, Hazaribagh and Palamou. + +The insurgents adopted most cruel means and spared no one. They torched houses and killed the enemies. Only carpenters and blacksmiths were spared since they made weapons and other useful goods for them. After two years of intense resistance they lost to modern weapons of the British. Thousands of tribal men, women and children were killed and the rebellion was suppressed.<ref>http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule.</ref> +==Reference== '
New page size (new_size)
1760
Old page size (old_size)
0
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
1760
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => '==Ho Rebellion==', 1 => 'The Ho and Munda tribesmen of Chhotanagpur challenged the Company’s forces in 1820-22, then again in 1831, and the area remained disturbed till 1837.The tribal inhabitants of Chota Nagpur comprised Kols, Bhils, Hoes, Mundas and Oraons. They led an independent life.', 2 => '1. In 1820 the king of Porhat owed allegiance to the British and agreed to pay huge taxes annually. He claimed the neighboring Hos region as his own to the consent of the British. He went on to collect taxes from the Ho segment of the Hos which they resented. A few officials were killed too.', 3 => false, 4 => 'The British sent troops in support of the king. The Hos took up traditional arms like bows and arrows to face British troops armed in modern weapons. They put up a very brave fight but had to surrender in 1821.', 5 => false, 6 => '2. The Hos rose again in 1831. The Chhota Nagpur region was leased out to Hindu, Muslim and Sikh money-lenders for revenue collection. Their oppressive tactics, high revenue rates, British judicial and revenue policies devastated the traditional social framework of the Hos.They gathered under Bir Budhu Bhagat, Joa Bhagat, Jhindrai Manki and Sui Munda. In 1831, Munda and Oraon peasants first took up arms against the British. It encouraged tribals in Singbhum, Manbhum, Hazaribagh and Palamou.', 7 => false, 8 => 'The insurgents adopted most cruel means and spared no one. They torched houses and killed the enemies. Only carpenters and blacksmiths were spared since they made weapons and other useful goods for them. After two years of intense resistance they lost to modern weapons of the British. Thousands of tribal men, women and children were killed and the rebellion was suppressed.<ref>http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule.</ref>', 9 => '==Reference==' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[]
Parsed HTML source of the new revision (new_html)
'<div class="mw-parser-output"><h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Ho_Rebellion">Ho Rebellion</span><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/https/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ho_rebellion&amp;action=edit&amp;section=1" title="Edit section: Ho Rebellion">edit source</a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2> <p>The Ho and Munda tribesmen of Chhotanagpur challenged the Company’s forces in 1820-22, then again in 1831, and the area remained disturbed till 1837.The tribal inhabitants of Chota Nagpur comprised Kols, Bhils, Hoes, Mundas and Oraons. They led an independent life.</p> <p>1. In 1820 the king of Porhat owed allegiance to the British and agreed to pay huge taxes annually. He claimed the neighboring Hos region as his own to the consent of the British. He went on to collect taxes from the Ho segment of the Hos which they resented. A few officials were killed too.</p> <p>The British sent troops in support of the king. The Hos took up traditional arms like bows and arrows to face British troops armed in modern weapons. They put up a very brave fight but had to surrender in 1821.</p> <p>2. The Hos rose again in 1831. The Chhota Nagpur region was leased out to Hindu, Muslim and Sikh money-lenders for revenue collection. Their oppressive tactics, high revenue rates, British judicial and revenue policies devastated the traditional social framework of the Hos.They gathered under Bir Budhu Bhagat, Joa Bhagat, Jhindrai Manki and Sui Munda. In 1831, Munda and Oraon peasants first took up arms against the British. It encouraged tribals in Singbhum, Manbhum, Hazaribagh and Palamou.</p> <p>The insurgents adopted most cruel means and spared no one. They torched houses and killed the enemies. Only carpenters and blacksmiths were spared since they made weapons and other useful goods for them. After two years of intense resistance they lost to modern weapons of the British. Thousands of tribal men, women and children were killed and the rebellion was suppressed.<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-1">[1]</a></sup></p> <h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Reference">Reference</span><span class="mw-editsection"><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">[</span><a href="/https/en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ho_rebellion&amp;action=edit&amp;section=2" title="Edit section: Reference">edit source</a><span class="mw-editsection-bracket">]</span></span></h2> <div class="mw-references-wrap"> <ol class="references"> <li id="cite_note-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-1">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule">http://history4upsc.blogspot.in/2010/07/uprisings-against-british-rule</a>.</span></li> </ol> </div> <!-- NewPP limit report Parsed by mw1278 Cached time: 20180409164457 Cache expiry: 1900800 Dynamic content: false CPU time usage: 0.004 seconds Real time usage: 0.004 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 17/1000000 Preprocessor generated node count: 0/1500000 Post‐expand include size: 0/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 0/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 2/40 Expensive parser function count: 0/500 Unstrip recursion depth: 0/20 Unstrip post‐expand size: 83/5000000 bytes --> <!-- Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template) 100.00% 0.000 1 -total --> </div>'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1523292300