Bryan–Chamorro Treaty

The Bryan–Chamorro Treaty was signed between Nicaragua and the United States on August 5, 1914. It gave the United States full rights over any future canal built through Nicaragua. The Wilson administration changed the treaty by adding a provision similar in language to that of the Platt Amendment, which would have authorized military intervention in Nicaragua. The United States Senate opposed the new provision; in response, it was dropped and the treaty was formally ratified on June 19, 1916.

History

The democratically elected and reform-minded Liberal Party president José Santos Zelaya López had incurred the wrath of the United States by negotiating with France, Germany, and Japan to resurrect the proposed Nicaragua Canal, which might constitute potential future foreign competition with the newly built, U.S.-owned Panama Canal. After supporting an insurgency against the government led by Conservative Party insurgents Emiliano Chamorro and Juan José Estrada with arms, funds, troops, warships, and economic measures, the United States eventually forced the popular liberal Presidents José Zelaya and then Jose Madriz to flee the country. It then installed the conservative governments of first Juan José Estrada (soon deposed by the powerful Secretary of War Luis Mena) and then former Vice President Adolfo Díaz. When General Luis Mena convinced the National Assembly to name him successor to the unpopular pro-U.S. Adolfo Díaz, the United States invaded and occupied Nicaragua militarily from 1912 to 1933, wrote a new constitution for the country, changed the National Assembly, and propped up successive conservative regimes under the presidents Adolfo Díaz, Emiliano Chamorro, and Diego Manuel Chamorro. Luis Mena fled into the countryside to start a rebellion, which continued under various leaders for the next 60 years. In exchange for political concessions from Adolfo Díaz, the United States provided the military strength to suppress popular revolt and ensure the conservative regime maintained control over the Nicaraguan government. For much of the 20th century, Nicaragua remained controlled under the hereditary dictatorship of the Chamorro and after 1936 the Somoza dynasties until widespread rebellions forced them out of power in the 1970s.^[1]^{: 111, 197}^[2]^[3]^[4]^: 143

The Treaty was named after the principal negotiators: William Jennings Bryan, U.S. Secretary of State; and the then General Emiliano Chamorro, representing the Nicaraguan government. By the terms of the treaty, the United States acquired the rights to any canal built in Nicaragua in perpetuity, a renewable 99year option to establish a naval base in the Gulf of Fonseca, and a renewable 99-year lease to the Great and Little Corn Islands in the Caribbean. For those concessions, Nicaragua received $3 million.

Most of the $3 million was paid back to U.S. creditors by U.S. officials in charge of Nicaraguan financial affairs, which allowed the Nicaraguan government to continue to collect internal revenue. The debt had been quickly amassed in a two-year period by the Nicaraguan government of Juan José Estrada under the American "dollars for bullets" scheme to retard infrastructure development funding from rival powers and lingering debts from earlier indemnities Nicaragua was forced to pay the foreign occupying powers of the United States and Great Britain, and repairing the devastation inflicted from the war with Great Britain, war with the United States and the civil war of Luis Mena's Rebellion.^[4]^: 143^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]

At the request of Nicaragua, the United States under Richard Nixon and Nicaragua under Anastasio Somoza Debayle held a convention, on July 14, 1970, that officially abolished the treaty and all its provisions.

Intended impact

At various times since the Panama Canal opened in 1914, the Nicaragua route has been reconsidered. Its construction would shorten the water distance between New York and San Francisco by nearly 800 kilometers (500 mi). The Bryan–Chamorro Treaty kept Nicaragua from—and stopped any potential European powers from—competing with the Panama Canal.

Unintended impact

The provision of the Bryan–Chamorro Treaty granting rights to United States to build a naval base in the Gulf of Fonseca was contested by El Salvador and Costa Rica. The Central American Court of Justice saw in the favor of the two countries.^[9] The United States ignored the decision, contributing significantly to the court's collapse in 1918.

Notes

^ Pérez-Brignoli, Héctor; translated by Sawrey A., Ricardo B.; Sawrey, Susana Stettri de (1989). A Brief History of Central America (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520060494.
^ "US violence for a century: Nicaragua: 1912–33". Socialist Worker. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-21.
^ Munro, Dana Gardner (1964). Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900-1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 205. ISBN 9780691625010.
^ ^a ^b Musicant, Ivan (1990). The Banana Wars: A History of United States Military Intervention in Latin America from the Spanish–American War to the Invasion of Panama. New York: MacMillan Publishing. ISBN 978-0-02-588210-2.
^ "New York Tribune, December 21, 1909". Chroniclingamerica.loc.gov. 1909-12-21. Retrieved 2018-03-26.
^ The Los Angeles Herald December 21, 1909.
^ Healy, David (1 September 2011). US Expansionism: The Imperialist Urge in the 1890s. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 24. ISBN 9780299058531. Retrieved 2 January 2019 – via Google Books.
^ Abreu, María Verónica Valarino de (18 March 2017). The Anglo-Venezuelan Boundary Dispute: A Victory for Whom?. p. 33. ISBN 9781365833847. Retrieved 2 January 2019 – via Google Books.
^ "El Salvador v. Nicaragua, CACJ, Judgment of 9 March 1917, 11 Am. J. Int'l L. 674 (1917)". Archived from the original on 2017-07-20. Retrieved 2017-06-04.

External links

Text of Bryan-Chamorro Treaty - Library of Congress

[Brief-1] Pérez-Brignoli, Héctor; translated by Sawrey A., Ricardo B.; Sawrey, Susana Stettri de (1989). A Brief History of Central America (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520060494.

[2] "US violence for a century: Nicaragua: 1912–33". Socialist Worker. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-21.

[3] Munro, Dana Gardner (1964). Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900-1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 205. ISBN 9780691625010.

[Musicant-4] Musicant, Ivan (1990). The Banana Wars: A History of United States Military Intervention in Latin America from the Spanish–American War to the Invasion of Panama. New York: MacMillan Publishing. ISBN 978-0-02-588210-2.

[5] "New York Tribune, December 21, 1909". Chroniclingamerica.loc.gov. 1909-12-21. Retrieved 2018-03-26.

[6] The Los Angeles Herald December 21, 1909.

[7] Healy, David (1 September 2011). US Expansionism: The Imperialist Urge in the 1890s. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 24. ISBN 9780299058531. Retrieved 2 January 2019 – via Google Books.

[8] Abreu, María Verónica Valarino de (18 March 2017). The Anglo-Venezuelan Boundary Dispute: A Victory for Whom?. p. 33. ISBN 9781365833847. Retrieved 2 January 2019 – via Google Books.

[9] "El Salvador v. Nicaragua, CACJ, Judgment of 9 March 1917, 11 Am. J. Int'l L. 674 (1917)". Archived from the original on 2017-07-20. Retrieved 2017-06-04.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]