User talk:F.Alexsandr

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, F.Alexsandr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 13:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Korsar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Korsar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 176.88.142.57 (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 176.88.142.57 (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 176.88.136.86 (talk)

Your thread has been archived

Hi F.Alexsandr! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article creation and Draft problems, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Argo ( Russian spacecraft) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Argo ( Russian spacecraft). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russo-Ukrainian War and Opposition Platform — For Life

You can see from the very self article, how the conflict it's not "perceived", it is factual and ongoing, "ceasefire" has been invoked and are being invoked continuously, and Russia's intervention has been condemned by most of the United Nations community.

Yours seems like a non-neutral and revisionist modification, politically interested at worst. Do not insist. Lone Internaut (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lone Internaut and Lone Internaut: Its a western centric concept and a Western point of view. Russia is not CURRENTLY in a state of war with Ukraine and there is no CURRENT intervention. Please provide sources that russia is currently intrvening in Ukraine.

As I imagined: obviously it's all an "interpretation of the West", not the blatant truth under everyone's eyes... sure, of course. You seem indeed blatantly politicized. You find all the neutral (and reliable) sources in the article itself that I linked to you, it is you who must give the sources of how Russia is not doing intervention in Ukraine - both Crimean and Donbass.

If you insist, I'll have to bring the thing to the attention of the project or other users to generate a consensus. And believe me, I don't think they're going to buy the "bad and ugly West that lies" story - of course, because it's Russian-interested revisionism. Lone Internaut (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
	The Downlink	WikiProject Notification

This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.

The Downlink project page

I am notifying you, that thep The Downlink newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.

If you have any suggestions on what to add to the newsletter please leave a note at the newsletter discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink.
If you wish to have the newsletter added to your talk page on release then please add your name to here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Downlink/Recipients.

Thanks, Terasail ^[Talk]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alpha Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yenisei (rocket) has been accepted

Yenisei (rocket), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gam-COVID-Vac - alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RexxS (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argo (Russian spacecraft) has been accepted

Argo (Russian spacecraft), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sam-2727 (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding reason. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "thread name".The discussion is about the topic Gam-COVID-Vac.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Korsar UAV

The page Draft:Korsar UAV has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://vpk.name/library/f/korsar-bla.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Primefac (talk) 18:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC

Hans Globke

Hi @F.Alexsandr: Could you not a find a reference for that section instead of removing it, and even contacting me and I could have had a go at getting a reference. That section comes straight from the very well-written German article. scope_creep^Talk 15:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: I have scoured the German article, there was no information about motivations of the Soviets. The dismissive statement about them not caring about Globkes career in the Nazi past, and only caring because of his position in FRG is descriptive anyways and sounds like original research not grounded in any documentary evidence. F.Alexsandr (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starship price

Diff. Please give a timestamp. I won't watch that one hour video again now - I'm quite certain you misunderstand something, because Musk said it would be cheaper than Falcon 1. Using the 2016 presentation is questionable anyway, that's still the carbon fiber model with very different parameters than what SpaceX is building now. --mfb (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mfb and Mfb: on 43:16 in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Uyfqi_TE8&ab_channel=SpaceX you can clearly see on the screen 62 million dollars per flight. To be honest I think that there should be no cost estimates in the infobox at all, scince all of this is speculation on behalf of spaceX, but if 2 million aspirational number deserves to be in the infobox, i think that this number deserves too. F.Alexsandr (talk) 10:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is for a flight to Mars, which includes multiple launches of the system, and the main cost comes from the ship going to Mars because it cannot be reused often. The tanker is given as $8M for 5 flights, or $1.6M/flight, while the booster has $11 for 6 flights, or ~$1.8M/flight. Add both and we get $3.4 million per launch to Earth orbit. Which isn't too far off from the 2 million optimistic goal. --mfb (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mfb and Mfb: You are doing original research. All of this is pure speculation on your behalf. Once again, both numbers were provided by SpaceX, both numbers deserve to be up there. Or neither. F.Alexsandr (talk) 11:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no OR about the price being for a flight to Mars (it's on the slide!), which is not what the infobox is about. Quoting it there is just wrong. I explained the slide to you here on your talk page. WP:OR applies to articles, not to user talk pages. Ignore that explanation if you don't like it, but save the article from completely wrong information please. --mfb (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B45 (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6B45 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B45 has been accepted

6B45, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B1 has been accepted

6B1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello F.Alexsandr and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2S39 Magnolia (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2S39 Magnolia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 01:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, F.Alexsandr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 01:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2S42 Lotos has been accepted

2S42 Lotos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:6B23 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:6B23. Thanks! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 17:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B23 (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6B23 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on the draft: Flux_Malaysia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Flux_Malaysia

Dear @F.Alexandr,

I want to express my gratitude for taking the time to review my article, even though the outcome was less favorable than I had hoped. I would really like to get some insights if you do not mind sharing as I am new in publishing articles and after 3 months of efforts it is kind of disappointing that I could not get the article approved still.

I did have learned and improved but now stuck at the reference where i am not sure what is wrong as i did check notable regulations and reference guide and i cannot locate why it has been declined still.

One point about the reference is that as this is a new type of business in Malaysia so finding completely independent article on Flux is difficult but i did see some competitor's post has been approved even with not too much independent references which i am giving example below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carsome

This even got approved with their CEO interview while mine got rejected.

It will be very helpful if you can help in guiding where exactly to change and get the article approve to publish. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 09:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AfnanzafarBD. The existence of a car sharing business or used cars business does not guarantee that it will automatically be notable for inclusion to Wikipedia. Carsome, which you gave as an example, is also on the verge of being notable, however, as one of the articles states, the company’s valuation is US$1.3 billion making it one of the largest tech unicorns in Malaysia, it is also older than Flux.

As you also know, reliable independent sources are required for the article to be accepted, which is severely lacking from your article. You can try supporting your article by Malaysian language sources, if you think there is not much data in English.

If you think that reviewers are unfair, and you still think this company is notable enough, you can ask around on WP:MALAYSIA. to find advice and support for your case, although I dont think you will find much success. F.Alexsandr (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B23 has been accepted

6B23, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B2 has been accepted

6B2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 6B23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annexation of Crimea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B3 has been accepted

6B3, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: QSZ-11

Dear F.Alexsandr,

Thank you for reviewing my article and commenting. I have made changes from your suggestions (added more sources) and I also added more content from reading these sources. Can you please review it again? Thanks. Hi (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6B5 "Ulej" has been accepted

6B5 "Ulej", which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 23:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: QSB-11

Dear F.Alexsandr,

I have edited the article and removed the sources and images. The image now used is an existing Wikimedia image. Can you review it again please? Hi (talk) 12:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zabralo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zabralo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, sorry, my first article creation outside of AFC. F.Alexsandr (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to editors who rescue articles from deletion. From the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron. This barnstar is awarded to F.Alexsandr. Thank you for approving Soviet Peace Fund! Ikipedia2 (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2S41 Drok

A tag has been placed on 2S41 Drok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Tails Wx 03:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Wikiproject Military History Assessment

Note at the top of the assessment request page: “Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria (FAQ) up to and including C-Class.” The link to the page about the five criteria and other frequently asked questions is Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/B-Class FAQ. If you assess an article as C class, you will need to show “no” to one of the five criteria on the article talk page. That would likely be completeness of coverage, but could be one of the other four.

An outline of the assessment process overall, for all levels or grades of assessment, is shown at [[1]]. There is FAQ information near the bottom of the page.

The assessment template must be used to put an assessment on the article talk page as part of the process. The full template project banner and some explanation and information are at Template:WikiProject Military history. The full banner shown on that page is not used in its entirety because only a few task forces would apply to any particular article. I have never seen the portal parameters used. I feel confident in ignoring them.

The linked template information page in the previous paragraph has some information that seems superfluous when you get to know how to place a template. It is a good idea to become familiar with it, however, because it has some useful information which may not be apparent on other pages.

I put the template on talk pages manually because the template link seems to put unnecessary information on the page, including criteria explanation after the criteria numbers. That means a user must be sure to fill in, or eliminate, any parameters or wordings that would not produce an accurate template for a particular article. Some users may put those explanations in with a blank or incomplete project banner as notice of the requirements for each criteria

This is the template that I used on the Zemledeliye (minelaying system) talk page - with nowiki code that is only used here to prevent a full completed template itself from showing on this page. The nowikis are not used on the article talk pages. {{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=yes|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes|Russian=yes|Cold-War=yes}} This can be copied and used on other pages. If an article is start or C class, the class item is changed to “start” or “C” and criteria are marked “no” as required for each level. For a stub, “stub” would be show after “class=” and either all the criteria are marked no or they are blank. They don't even need to be listed in a stub template but sometimes they are placed as a convenience for later reviewers.

Military history article assessments are slightly different than the general article assessment criteria and information. If other projects also assess an article, the process and criteria might differ, although they would be mostly the same.

Note that any military history project coordinator can change a self-assessment. An experienced user can do so as well. If the person who self assesses disagrees with such a reassessment, the writer can request that a coordinator perform a further review to decide the appropriate assessment class. The MILHIST bot also assesses articles up to B class. A coordinator runs the bot monthly. I am not sure how the bot picks up unassessed articles to assess. (There is a category for articles needing assessment. The bot may look at that. There may be yet another way the bot finds them. I mention this because I think the bot may not pick up all unassessed military history articles or military history articles where other projects are also interested.) Coordinators can, and every month usually do, downgrade one or more assessments made by the bot.

I should add that there may be situations where a self-assessment as "start" is preferable or more accurate than C. You can ask for a higher assessment (C or B) immediately on the assessment request page if you think it deserves one or use it as a starting point for your own later additions and improvements. Note the requirements, and possible needed upgrading, on the general assessment information pages cited.

If this information is incomplete or not understandable in some respect, let me know. I will try to add to it or reword it. Donner60 (talk) 03:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for indepth explanation F.Alexsandr (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My proofreading was not up to par. I left out "of" in "outline of assessment." I had "criteria explanations" twice when "criteria numbers" should have been the second phrase in the sentence. I had a stray word "for" which I deleted. Sorry for my lapses in proofreading. I changed the errors. I hope it was understandable enough but if any of the errors and the double criteria explanations error in particular was confusing, it should now be fixed. Donner60 (talk) 05:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2S39 Magnolia has been accepted

2S39 Magnolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 18:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined

Why did you decline my draft? Most pages like this are copied from the main article (Flag of ...). You can check every page of these list of flags if you want to confirm that I'm saying the right thing. #bodyContent aFlag Creator { background-color: #ffa500; color: #ggggggg; font-weight: monoscope; } 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TMM-6 (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The newly added source looks good, though I have limited access - can you find 1-2 more like it?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TMM-6 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 02:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:49:10, 21 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Thedoor2009

Thedoor2009 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Min He (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi F.Alexsandr,

Thank you so much for reviewing the wiki draft and it would be much appreciated if you could provide more details about the references I used in the article.

Would you mind pointing out which reference doesn't have the significant coverage about the subject? It would help me to understand more about why the current refernces don't match the requirement.

Thank you.

Best regards, -thedoor2009

Thedoor2009 (talk) 04:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Татьяна Фрунзе.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Татьяна Фрунзе.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

		Here's a brownie for your efforts
		Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 8 reviews, for a total of 8 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M-1952 Flak Jacket has been accepted

M-1952 Flak Jacket, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on 6B6 helmet. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CS/VP3 MRAP and Draft: CS/LR19

Dear F.Alexsandr,

I have edited the references as per your advice by adding working links into all of them. Can you please review it again? Thank you very much. Hi (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aaron Lehrian

Hello,

I have left you a comment regarding your rejection of my article Draft:Aaron Lehrian. You said it does not pass Wikipedia:MUSICBIO; however, I believe it passes #7 (Aaron is one of the prominent musicians representing Savannah, GA and the Southeast jazz scene), and definitely passes #9 (he has won first and second places in major international music competitions). Would you mind taking another look? Beethoven freak (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on Angara-1.2. Timothytyy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Timothytyy}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Timothytyy (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ballistic vest articles

I have assessed all four articles as B class. I made some copy edits in them which I classify as minor and for clarity. I intended no substantive changes. Please review the articles. If I have made any errors or otherwise changed the meaning of anything in the article or if you disagree with any changes, please remove or further change the changes. Thank you for your work on these articles. Donner60 (talk) 10:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input! F.Alexsandr (talk) 10:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on PE scope. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on Ural Works of Civil Aviation. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on TVRS-44. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on KBS Strelok. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on Monument to Warriors-Internationalists. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit to Zircon missile

Hi, can you please change the last sentence in the deployment section to "Major Illia Yevlash, a spokesman for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), *claimed* that Patriot and SAMP/T systems *are capable of destroying* the Zircon in the terminal phase when the Zircon *allegedly* slows to Mach 4.5, *according to Ukraine*"

The source doesn't say that the Patriot actually intercepted the missile, but that it can. So it's misleading. The page is protected so I can't make the edit. This is far more neutral and accurate.

Thanks. 82.0.40.72 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you. F.Alexsandr (talk) 14:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on ZhZT-71. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on UMPK (bomb kit). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on MP-155. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soviet and Russian aerial bombs

A tag has been placed on Soviet and Russian aerial bombs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://dversam.ru/en/fugasnye-aviabomby.html, https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1223715591&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffanyv88.com%3A443%2Fhttps%2Fdversam.ru%2Fen%2Ffugasnye-aviabomby.html, and https://copypatrol.wmcloud.org/en?id=cf0c892c-d19e-4558-b915-41bedd5fc021. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Timothy :: talk 22:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 - unreliable sources

Greetings! Please don't use unreliable sources in Wikipedia articles, as you did in [2]. RIA, Ukrinform and some other sources you used are unreliable. Thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not unreliable sources. They are allowed on wikipedia, please stop blanket deleting all russian sources from the page, you give no reason for this. F.Alexsandr (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't claim they are reliable without proof, thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof that they are unreliable is on you. RG.ru and RIA Novosti are cited all over wikipedia, and ВЗГЛЯД.РУ, while dubious, is not a deprecated source, and only quotes a Ukrainian official. The only actual unreliable source you deleted is Lenta.ru. Please restore other citations. F.Alexsandr (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable sources WP:RS , and if you are claiming they are reliable, you need to prove it. RIA is not reliable WP:RIANOVOSTI, and other's reliability is dubious. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 - unsourced info

Greetings! Please don't add claims which are not found in reliable sources, as you did in [3]. Thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hello. Your edits removing categories of Russian war crimes and murder in Ukraine are a gross violation of neutrality and POV-pushing, particularly with edit summaries either apparently denying the crimes [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9], or using false edit summaries to hide the categories' removal [10] [11] [12]. If you continue this I will report you to WP:ANI. These are not the edits of someone here to build an encyclopedia. If you have an issue with the categories start a discussion, and if you feel like you need to change ten articles maybe it's not them the ones that have an issue. Maybe you have the problem. Super Ψ Dro 11:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on Kronshtadt Sirius. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi F.Alexsandr. Thank you for your work on Kronshtadt Helios-RLD. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:RD-0169

Hello, F.Alexsandr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RD-0169, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Verkhny Verman

Hello, F.Alexsandr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Verkhny Verman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:RD-0169

Hello, F.Alexsandr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "RD-0169".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Verkhny Verman

Hello, F.Alexsandr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Verkhny Verman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2S38 Derivatsiya-PVO (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pichemist were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2S38 Derivatsiya-PVO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sydney Jackson

Hello, F.Alexsandr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sydney Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sydney Jackson

Hello, F.Alexsandr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sydney Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]