Talk:The Invention of Art

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Invention of Art article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 13 January 2013 by reviewer Titodutta (talk · contribs).

Visual arts C‑class

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

From the book...

Previous content appears to be from summaries and reviews. I am currently reading the book. FigureArtist (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this book have a wiki entry?

This wiki entry reads exactly like a publishing house's ad page, complete with nice excerpts from reviews. It does not tell me how this book is actually discussed and used in scholarship which might go a long way to prove why this book is important enough to have its own wikipedia page.147.142.173.226 (talk) 06:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]