Talk:Segata Sanshiro

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2018;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Segata Sanshiro has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 11, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Japan: Business and economy Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:39, November 1, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Business and economy task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Video games: Sega / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sega task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Segata Sanshiro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TarkusAB (talk · contribs) 14:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. TarkusAB^talk 14:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To save time on the review, I will make minor corrections myself which I think would go unchallenged. You can revert them if you disagree or modify. I'll bring them up here if I think it's necessary.

Lead

Do you think the infobox is really necessary? I mean keep a thumbnail image, but all the information in the box can be derived by reading the first paragraph. If you keep the info there and there only, it will invite readers to read the actual article.

Advertising campaign

"being a karate and iaidō first dan, judo third dan, battoudou and kotachi goshindo fourth dan, and toudou seventh dan," Do we really need to list out all his martial arts rankings? Most of this will sound like nonsense to most readers. Maybe we can say "Fujioka was also a skilled martial artist, experienced in multiple disciplines including karate and judo, making him a close fir for the role."
"send a strong message to children..." This is mentioned a couple times in the article, but it's not clear to me what strong message they were sending to children. It sounds like it would be some type of moral lesson, but all I hear them saying is Play Sega Saturn.
- Fujioka himself is not exactly clear in the GamesTM article what that message was, other than to say he felt kids of the time had "no direction". That's why I included the quote of the radio advertisement, in order to try and provide some context.
"...was approaching and Saturn development had ended." Development on Saturn games had slowed down? Or production on systems had stopped? I think saying development on all Saturn games stopped isn't true because some games still came out after the Dreamcast was out, no?

Later appearances

"Fujioka returned as Segata in 2013 at a live concert." Do we know what the live concert was for? Was the concert just featuring him or was he just a cameo appearance in something else? I was left wondering

Segata Sanshirō Shinken Yūgi

Again, is the infobox really necessary. All the points can be summed up in a couple sentences.
"Shinken Yūgi is noted for" Popcornduff would slap you for using "noted". Noted should only be used for when critics take note of an objective fact, not give opinion.
"that Shinken Yūgi's best value was its historical value." Fix value repetition
"When GamesTM interviewed Fujioka, they noted his reaction about the game indicated that he was happy that the game was developed, but also aware that it was not a quality game." This sentence reads horribly. Game is repeated three times.

Done with review. TarkusAB^talk 13:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is addressed minus the comment about Fujioka's "message to children", which as I explained above was not really clear, even in the article it comes from. Red Phoenix ^talk 15:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK the article satisfies the GA criteria otherwise, so promoting this. TarkusAB^talk 20:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]