Talk:Certificate of occupancy

Picture of Document

Would this image (click here for the image) be considered fair use? (Source of image: [1]) Noone 22:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

New York Specific

Why is there a NY specific section on regulations? Seems like it should be taken out. --Messeis1 (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

My opinion exactly. I see nothing in the section which appears to be significantly different from the norm. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 14:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Certificate of Occupancy → Certificate of occupancy –

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

• Support this is the generic name of a type of documents. The names of specific certificates might be capitalized. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
• Support per nom. It's clear from the article that the subject is a generic concept, therefore downcasing is appropriate. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 07:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.