Harákmbut language
| Harákmbut | |
|---|---|
| aratbuten huaʼa | |
| Region | Peru |
| Ethnicity | 2,090 Harakmbut (2013) |
Native speakers | 2,200 (2000–2007)[1] |
Harákmbut–Katukinan
| |
| Dialects |
|
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | Either:amr – Amarakaerihug – Huachipaeri |
| Glottolog | hara1260 |
| ELP | Harakmbut |
 Amarakaeri (north) and Watipaeri (south). The shadowed area is the probable earlier distribution of the Harakmbut language. | |
Harakmbut or Harakmbet (stress on the second syllable) is the native language of the Harakmbut people of Peru. It is spoken along the Madre de Dios and Colorado Rivers, in the pre-contact country of the people. There are two dialects that remain vital: Amarakaeri (Arakmbut) and Watipaeri (Huachipaeri), which are reported to be mutually intelligible. The relationship between speakers of the two dialects is hostile.[2]
As of 2012, Amarakaeri is still being learned by children in some communities.[1] There 5% literacy compared to 75% literacy in the second language Spanish.[1] They live in the communities of Puerto Luz, Shintuya, San José Del Karene, Barranco Chico, Boca Inambari, Boca Ishiriwe, Puerto Azul, Masenawa and Kotsimba. The name Amarakaeri, from wa-mba-arak-a-eri "murderers", is considered derogatory; the endonym Arakmbut is preferred.[2]
Speakers of Watipaeri (wa-tipa-eri) are mostly concentrated in the indigenous communities of Queros and Santa Rosa de Huacaria, in the Peruvian rainforest. Their members have been experiencing cultural loss, including the complexities of their language, particularly because of the generational gap between the elders and the youth.[3]
Varietiesof
- Amarakaeri (autonym: Arakmbut), the most widely spoken dialect, is spoken in the indigenous communities of Puerto Luz, Shintuya, San José Del Karene, Barranco Chico, Boca Inambari, Boca Ishiriwe, Puerto Azul, Masenawa, and Kotsimba. There is an ethnic population of 1043 as of 2007.
- Watipaeri, with an ethnic population of 392 in Queros and Santa Rosa de Huacaria
- Arasaeri has an ethnic population of 317 in Arazaeri (arãsã-eri, people of the Marcatapa River; spoken in Arazaeri)
- Pukirieri has an ethnic population of 168 (pukiri-eri, people of the Pukiri River)
- Sapiteri and Kisambaeri (ethnic population of 47, in Barranco Chico)
- Toyoeri: extinct (toyo(dn)-eri, people downriver)
There are at most only a handful of fluent speakers remaining for any of these dialects.[2]
The genetic position of Toyoeri is disputed. Some researchers have divided the dialects into two main groups, with Watipaeri and Toyoeri phonetically and lexically somewhat different from Amarakaeri/Arakmbut, Arasaeri and Sapiteri. Data from Aza (1936) and Peck (1958), however, suggest that Arakmbut is different from the other four, which are similar to each other.[2]
Classification
Harakmbut has been accepted as a language isolate since the 1960s.[2] Adelaar (2000, 2007)[5][6] presents mainly lexical evidence that it is related to the Katukinan family of Brazil; influence from Tupian languages also suggest an origin in Brazil. Campbell (2012) accepted the evidence as "reasonably persuasive".[7] Jolkesky (2011) concurs, and adds Arawan to the family.[8] Glottolog notes "promising lexical links with Katukina [...] with a fair amount of near-identical forms, but the systems of pronouns, numerals or bound morphology show no cognation.[citation needed]
Language contact
Jolkesky (2016) notes that there are lexical similarities with the Pano, Puinave-Nadahup, Tupian, and Arawakan language families due to contact.[9]
Similarities with Tupian may be indicative of an earlier origin downstream in the Madeira River interaction sphere.[9]: 344
Phonology
The following inventory is that of Amarakaeri, the most vital dialect. Other dialects appear to only differ in the presence of /h/ or the lack of /w/.
Amarakaeri has ten vowels:[2]
| Front | Central | Back | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Close | i ĩ | u ũ | |
| Close-mid | ɛ ɛ̃ | ɔ ɔ̃ | |
| Open | a ã |
When adjacent to /a/, /e/ tends to rise to /i/ or /j/. This can cause palatalization of a preceding consonant, e.g. kate-apo 'why?' as [ˈkatiabɔ] or [ˈkaʧabɔ]. Similarly, /o/ tends to rise to /u/ or /w/ when adjacent to /a/ or /e/, e.g. ĩ-nõ-põ-ẽ-ỹ 'I know' as [ĩˈnɔ̃pwɛ̃j̃].[2]
Consonants are as follows:[2]
| Bilabial | Alveolar | Velar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal | m | n | ŋ |
| Stop | p | t | k |
| Fricative | s | ||
| Approximant | w | ||
| Flap | ɾ |
The phonemic status of [h] and [ʔ] is not clear. They vary between dialects, but also between speakers and even with the same speaker in Arakmbut. They may be epenthetic consonants used to demarcate syllables that do not have an onset or coda consonant.[2]
/t k n s/ occur in syllable codas, and /ŋ/ only in syllable codas.[2]
Stops tend toward [b d ɡ] in intervocalic position. (In Toyoeri and Sapiteri, this has only been reported for /k/.) Among younger people, and often among their elders, the alveolars /t n/ palatalize to [t͜ʃ] and [ɲ] (or [nd͜ʒ]) before /i, ĩ/; /s/ palatalizes to [ʃ] before /i, ĩ/ and /u, ũ/. (In Toyoeri and Sapiteri, this has only been reported for /t/.)[2]
The nasal consonants have different realizations, depending on whether adjacent vowels are oral or nasal, with /m/ and /n/ affected before an oral vowel, and /n/ and /ŋ/ affected after one:
Nasal allophones V_ Ṽ_ _V _Ṽ m m m mb m n dn n nd n ŋ ɡŋ ŋ —
This allophonic variation is reflected in the community orthography, and the same pattern has been reported for Watipaeri, Arasaeri, Toyoeri and Sapiteri.[2]
The nature of Harakmbut nasality has yet to be fully elucidated, and in Amarakaeri at least there is some free variation of allophones. For instance, 'five' has been attested as both [waˈmaʔnɛ̃ŋ] and [waˈmbaʔnɛ̃ŋ]. Nonetheless, there is a phonemic distinction of vowel nasalization after nasal consonants, as in the proper name /mɔɾimɔ̃/.[2]
Stress is on the penultimate syllable, not counting inflectional suffixes, which do not change stress placement in a word.[2]
Grammar
Noun phrases follow a fixed order of base-case-collective-focus1-focus2. Nouns can take on 11 cases, as well as the collective suffix -(o)mey and the focus suffixes -yo 'only', -nãỹõ, or -nda. The privative denotes lack or absence of the referent.
| Case | Form |
|---|---|
| Nominative/Instrumental | -ʔa, -a |
| Comitative/Instrumental | -ere |
| Accusative | -ta(h) |
| Genitive | -en, -edn, -wedn, -ʔedn |
| Benefactive | -tewapa |
| Similative | -oniŋ |
| Reason | -apo |
| Privative | -mbayo |
| Locative | -yo, -ya, -taʔ, -te, -yon, -pen |
Pronouns in Harakmbut inflect for person and number. There are two independent demonstrative pronouns: proximal ine and distal kene. When modifying a noun, these become in and ken, respectively. Interrogative pronouns mainly distinguish between human and non-human referents, with mbeʔ 'who/which' being for human referents and kate 'what/which' denoting nonhuman referents. men 'which' may also be used for nonhuman referents. These also serve as the realis indefinite pronouns. Free-choice indefinites, however, add the clitic = piʔ.[2]
| Singular | Plural | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ndoʔ | oroʔ |
| 2 | on | opudn |
| 3 | ken | |
mboerek
man
o-mba-yok-me
3SG.IND-V.PL-give-REC.PST
tareʔ
manioc
mbeʔ-ta=piʔ
somebody-ACC=INDET
The man gave manioc to whomever
In Harákmbut, there are two main noun classe: free nouns and bound nouns. While free nouns can act as their own lexical items, bound nouns require a prefix. There are two nominalizers, wa- and e-, that derive a free noun from a bound noun. They may derive different semantic meanings from the same root (i.e. wa-mbaʔ 'hand', e-mbaʔ 'leaf'). e- nouns generally derive inalienably possessed nouns, like body parts, plant parts, and landscape parts. Otherwise, nouns are 'bound' to a prefix, which can be a genitive, determiner, demonstrative, interrogative pronouns, or other modifier.
Numerals in Harákmbut, like in many languages, refer to the five-fingered hand as a base.[2]
| Numeral | Harákmbut | Gloss |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | noŋ-ti-nda | other-SPAT:up-NDA |
| 2 | mbottaʔ | two |
| 3 | mbapaʔ | three |
| 4 | mbottaʔ-mbottaʔ | two-two |
| 5 | wa-mbaʔ-neŋ | NMLZ-hand-amount |
Adjectives may be prenominal and prefixed to the noun or postnominal with a nominalizing prefix. While often used in adjectives, it is unclear the exact function of the suffix -nda outside of being a focus marker in the noun phrase.
Verbs in Harákmbut contain four fixed prefix positions and seven fixed suffix positions. The verbal plural marker and spatial markers may be positioned in multiple acceptable places in the prefix. The first prefix is a mood and argument agreement prefix, followed by applicative marking, then the nominal classifier, and finally the socially causative. There are three moods: indicative, dubious, and imperative. Each type agreement and mood has a specific prefix and suffix combination based on the person, its role (Agent or Object), and the mood. After the verbs stem, the suffixes denote the aspect, associated motion, the verbal plural, tense, and transitivity.[2]
| Agent | Object | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SG | 2SG | 3SG/PL | 1PL | 2PL | ||||||
| IND/DUB | IMP | IND/DUB | IMP | IND/DUB | IMP | IND | IMP | IND | IMP | |
| 1SG | o(ʔ)-...-ne | o(ʔ)-...-i | i(ʔ)-...-i | a(ʔ)-...-i | on-...-ne | on-...-i | ||||
| 2SG | o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)e(ʔ)-...-ø | i(ʔ)-...-ne | (y)a(ʔ)-...-ø | o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | ||||
| 3SG | m(b)e(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)e(ʔ)--eʔ | m(b)e(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)e(ʔ)-...-eʔ | o(ʔ)-...-ø (indicative)
(y)a(ʔ)-...-ø (dubious) |
ka(ʔ)-...-eʔ | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-eʔ |
| 1PL | o(ʔ)-...-ne | o(ʔ)-...-i | o(ʔ)-...-i (inclusive)
o(ʔ)-...-ne (exclusive) |
m(b)o(ʔ)- (dual)
mon- (plural) |
on-...-ne | on-...-i | ||||
| 2PL | on-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | (y)an(d)-...-ø | on-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | ||||
| 3PL | men-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-eʔ | on(d)-...-ø (indicative)
(y)an(d)-...-ø (dubious) |
kan(d)-...-eʔ | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-~men-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-ne | m(b)o(ʔ)-...-eʔ |
On finite verbs, the future (-apo), present (unmarked), recent past (-me), and distant past (-uy) tenses are distinguished. The indirect evidential marker -(a)te is suffixed after past tense markers. Inferential modality is marked with -ta and epistemic modality with -et. Future possibility is marked by -ipot.[2]
hak-ʔudn-ya
house-upper.back-LOC
o-ti-kot-uy-ate
3SG.IND-SPAT:up-fall-REM-INDIR
wẽỹ-paʔ-a
tree-CLF:rod-NOM
A branch fell on the roof long ago
Verbal pluractionality is marked on verbs, as well as habitual -ika and iterative -e. The perfective aspect marker -a(d)n also codes volitionality (whether an action was performed intentionally), while non-volitionality is marked with -o(d)n. Verbs can be marked with a spatial or associated motion.
The basic word order is Subject-Object-Verb, with occasional Object-Verb-Subject in thetic clauses.
Vocabulary
Loukotka (1968) lists the following basic vocabulary items for Toyeri (also spelled in other sources as Toyoeri), a variety of Harákmbut.[10]
gloss Toyeri one unchinda two botta three baʔpa tooth ua-ít tongue ua-no hand ua-mba woman uaxet water meei fire táʔak moon pöxen maize sinke jaguar apane house xahak
See also
Bibliography
- Aza Martínez, J. P. (1936). Vocabulario español-arasairi. Lima: San Martín y Cía. BACELAR, L. N. (1992). Fonologia preliminar da língua Kanoê. Brasilia: UnB.
- Peck, Ch. (2008 [1979]). Toyeri y Sapiteri: un informe preliminar de la fonología y el vocabulario. (Datos Etno-Lingüísticos, 67). Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Summer Institute of Linguistics.
- Tripp, R. (1995). Diccionario Amarakaeri-Castellano. (Serie Lingüística Peruana, 34). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación / Summer Institute of Linguistics.
- Harakmbut An van linden, "Harakmbut". In Patience Epps and Lev Michael, eds, Amazonian Languages, An International Handbook. De Gruyter Mouton
References
- ^ a b c Amarakaeri at Ethnologue (25th ed., 2022)
Huachipaeri at Ethnologue (25th ed., 2022)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Harakmbut An van linden, "Harakmbut". In Patience Epps and Lev Michael, eds, Amazonian Languages, An International Handbook. De Gruyter Mouton
- ^ Tello, Rodolfo (2014). Hunting Practices of the Wachiperi: Demystifying Indigenous Environmental Behavior. Arlington, VA: Amakella Publishing.
- ^ Epps, Patience; Michael, Lev, eds. (2023). Amazonian Languages: Language Isolates. Volume I: Aikanã to Kandozi-Chapra. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-041940-5.
- ^ Willem Adelaar (2000) Propuesta de un nuevo vínculo genético entre dos grupos lingüísticos indígenas de la Amazonía occidental: Harakmbut y Katukina. In Luis Miranda Esquerre (ed.) Actas del I Congreso de Lenguas Indígenas de Sudamérica, 219–236. Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima.
- ^ —— (2007) Ensayo de clasificación del katawixí dentro del conjunto harakmbut-katukina. In Figueroa, Garay & Mori (eds.) Lenguas indígenas de América del Sur: Estudios descriptivo-tipológicos y sus contribuciones para la lingüística teórica, 159–169. Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Caracas.
- ^ Campbell, Lyle (2012). "Classification of the indigenous languages of South America". In Grondona, Verónica; Campbell, Lyle (eds.). The Indigenous Languages of South America. The World of Linguistics. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 59–166. ISBN 978-3-11-025513-3.
- ^ Jolkesky, Marcelo. 2011. Arawá-Katukína-Harakmbet: correspondências fonológicas, morfológicas e lexicais. Encontro Internacional: Arqueologia e Linguística Histórica das Línguas Indígenas Sul-Americanas Brasília, 24 a 28 de outubro de 2011.
- ^ a b Jolkesky, Marcelo Pinho de Valhery (2016). Estudo arqueo-ecolinguístico das terras tropicais sul-americanas (Ph.D. dissertation) (2 ed.). Brasília: University of Brasília.
- ^ Loukotka, Čestmír (1968). Classification of South American Indian languages. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.
Sources
- Alain Fabre, 2005, Diccionario etnolingüístico y guía bibliográfica de los pueblos indígenas sudamericanos,
Harakmbet – Lengua aislada (language isolate) (in Spanish)
