User talk:AxonsArachnida
Authorities
Hi, the parentheses in zoological authorities, as for example at the WSC entry for Desis marina (Hector, 1877) are important (they show a transfer from another genus) and are required in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
Working out synonyms from the WSC is unfortunately somewhat complex as it does not list synonyms, only references to the species in the literature. See the explanation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/Style guide#Synonyms. In the case of Desis marina, here's my working from the WSC:
- Dandridgea dysderoides White, 1849: 5 (misidentified) – this is a misidentification, not a synonym
- Argyroneta marina Hector, 1877 – the first use of the specific name marina so no parentheses used in the name "Argyroneta marina Hector, 1877"
- Desis robsoni Powell, 1879 – the first use of the specific name robsoni so no parentheses used in the name "Desis robsoni Powell, 1879"
- Robsonia marina O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1880 – a transfer of Hector's specific name marina to Robsonia, so listed as "Robsonia marina (Hector, 1877)"
- Desis marinus Pocock, 1895 – this is a transfer of Hector's specific name marina to Desis, but erroneously using a masculine ending, which the ICZN requires to be corrected. It should be cited as "Desis marina (Hector, 1877)" as was done by all later authors. As this is the accepted name, it's not a synonym.
- Desis marina Lehtinen, 1967 – just a taxonomic reference, not a synonym
- Desis marina Forster, 1970 – just a taxonomic reference, not a synonym
- Desis marina Coddington, 1990 – just a taxonomic reference, not a synonym
See also Author citation (zoology). Peter coxhead (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |