User talk:Sagecandor

Sagecandor is suffering from physical health issues. This may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. Consequently, they may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Welcome back!

I hope you're doing alright wherever you are. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Argento Surfer, I'm doing okay. Been to a bunch of doctors lately, but doing a little bit better. Sagecandor (talk) 12:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New article

New article, Damn Senators.

Sagecandor (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, not that there's anything wrong with your writing, but I always request copy edits from the Guild of Copy Editors when I nominate (or plan to nominate) an article for Good status, just for the added eyes and expertise. I've already nominated two of your book articles here, but since editors can only nominate 2 articles at a time, you might consider adding Damn Senators to Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests yourself. Not required, just a suggestion. :) ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer:Thank you, busy writing another article at the moment ! Sagecandor (talk) 20:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, just something to consider when you have a moment. Or, I can nominate for review once one of the other articles has been picked up. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer:Will do. I agree with you. Thanks for your helpful advice. And for your copyedits. Sagecandor (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer:Done. I put two up there, for Damn Senators and If It Ain't Got That Swing. Sagecandor (talk) 21:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! Thanks for the update. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed and accepted it with one of the hooks at DYK. Looks to be a nice article. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Frayae:Thank you very much ! Sagecandor (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New article

New article, If It Ain't Got That Swing.

Sagecandor (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New article

New article, A Tremor of Bliss.

Sagecandor (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the new articles lately! I was going to create that one but you beat me to it! ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 02:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorofthewiki:Thank you very much, I'm glad you appreciate my efforts creating new articles lately ! Sagecandor (talk) 02:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Would Like Help On the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination page please

For some strange reason, an edit containing information about Flake's request for an FBI request was erased. I would like it restored with a similar edit please.2601:447:4101:41F9:19F9:F6EE:D3E:6B13 (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, I'm sure it will be added soon. Sagecandor (talk) 19:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to now be added by another user [1]. Sagecandor (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update.2601:447:4101:41F9:19F9:F6EE:D3E:6B13 (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Euromaidan Press

New article, on Euromaidan Press. Sagecandor (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ana Maria Archila

A tag has been placed on Ana Maria Archila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G5 - created by a blocked sock of Cirt who was previously topic-banned from editing political biographies, and the subject of this article is heavily involved in politics

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. wumbolo ^^^ 15:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wumbolo:Please nominate that page for discussion at WP:AfD. Sagecandor (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article is non-notable or anything like that. But I'm not going to entertain your request unless you request that your topic ban is lifted. wumbolo ^^^ 15:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Tag was removed. Speedy delete tagging was contested. Sagecandor (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After speedy delete tag was removed, tagging user immediately nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Maria Archila. Sagecandor (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wumbolo: Stop tagging articles created by Sagecandor for g5. It's absolutely improper and again shows poor judgment on your part as to our deletion processes.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Time to Get Tough

Time to Get Tough is listed as a Good Article. It has been reviewed by Mike Christie and Argento Surfer. It has a history of contributions from multiple other editors. It should not be a candidate for speedy deletion. Sagecandor (talk) 15:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Insane Clown President

Insane Clown President is a Good Article. It has a review from Katolophyromai which was archived by Another Believer. It has a history of contributions from multiple other editors. It should not be a candidate for SPEEDY deletion. Sagecandor (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trump 101 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump 101 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump 101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trump: The Kremlin Candidate?

Trump: The Kremlin Candidate? should NOT be a candidate for speedy deletion. It has contributions from multiple editors. It has a GA Review from Adamstom.97. Other editors may wish to consult the GA Review in the future as part of improving Wikipedia. Sagecandor (talk) 16:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]