User talk:Piotrus
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Current RfAdminship
DYK Violetta ThurstanPiotrus, many thanks for your message and for taking an interest. I have to confess to messing up the nomination by adding a ginormous pic and not managing to correct things tidily. I got this far: [1] Sorry for the nuisance. Lelijg (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
SigningPlease be careful not to put a link to your own userspace from the mainspace, especially as a signature or similar (see [2], [3], and [4]. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Your PROD of Jeff StoreyHi Piotrus. There was a pre-existing article about this person at Jeffrey Storey (created in 2015, longer and with more references). I have taken the liberty of redirecting Jeff Storey there. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Witaj. Art powstal w ramach Wikiprojektu GLAM. Czy mozna wstawic do dyskusji szablon taki lub podobny jak w innych artach? 78.95.141.147 (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC) (Ciacho5).
ThxThx Swetoniusz (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Regarding your note on the COSIRES conference web page. It is certainly not a for-profit pseudo conference, which you could easily have figures out by checking the conference proceedings published in an Elsevier journal which are clearly cited on the page (even if you do not have access to all the articles, the table of contents and abstracts are available to anybody). Regarding notability, the research field has probably 1000-2000 people worldwide working on this, because it is an important scientific background for the semiconductor and nuclear industries. Admittedly this was not very clear in the article, so I modified it now with this kind of motivation. (Sorry if I responded in the wrong place, I followed the link sent by the email but was not quite sure where I should respond). Knordlun (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Revision for Coupon Sherpa pageHello, This is in response to the proposed and subsequent deletion of the Coupon Sherpa page. I created a new Draft:CouponSherpa page and revised the entry to include additional references to address the notability guidelines. There appear to be date issues with some of the references which I haven't figured out, but am working on. |