Jump to content

Robert G. James

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) at 08:00, 2 August 2016 (fix formatting using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Robert G. James
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Assumed office
May 31, 2016
Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
In office
2009–2012
Preceded byRichard T. Haik
Succeeded byDee D. Drell
Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
In office
August 3, 1998 – May 31, 2016
Appointed byBill Clinton
Preceded byJohn Malach Shaw
Succeeded byvacant
Personal details
Born1946 (age 77–78)
Ruston, Louisiana, U.S.
Alma materLouisiana Tech University
Louisiana State University Law School

Robert Gillespie James (born 1946) is a Senior United States District Court judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, and was one of the judges involved in a 2006 water rights legal case, Normal Parm v. Sheriff Mark Shumate.

Born in Ruston, Louisiana, James received a B.A. from Louisiana Tech University in 1968 and a J.D. from Louisiana State University Law School in 1971. He was in private practice in Ruston from 1971 to 1998, and was a business law instructor at Louisiana Tech University from 1992 to 1998. He was a judge on the Ruston City Court from 1985 to 1998.

On January 27, 1998, James was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana vacated by John M. Shaw. James was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 31, 1998, and received his commission on August 3, 1998. He assumed senior status on May 31, 2016.[relevant?] On August 29, 2006, James overruled Magistrate Judge James D. Kirk, who wrote that Federal law "...entitles the public to the reasonable use of navigable waters for all legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating, sailing for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire, and in any kind of watercraft the use of which is consistent with others also enjoying the right possessed in common." The holding confirmed that it was criminal trespass for boaters to enter property above the ordinary high-water mark of riparian landowners to fish or hunt without permission.[1] Strictly interpreting Federal law, James said that "the public has no 'right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River.'" [2] The original case was the result of the arrests of several anglers who were fishing in Mississippi River floodwaters, which had covered the private property of the Walker Cottonwood Farm. [3] The case shows that the public trust rights associated with navigable waterways do not extend to "flooded" areas.

References

Legal offices
Preceded by Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
2009–2012
Succeeded by
Preceded by Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
1998–2016
Vacant