Requests for arbitration

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns		14 May 2015	{{{votes}}}

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Historical elections	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	20 Aug 2024	03 Sep 2024

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b)	Motion	none	26 July 2024
Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral)	none	none	17 August 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns

Initiated by ^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} at 11:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Marketdiamond (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
Beyond My Ken (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Black Kite (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by Marketdiamond

Not the AfD but conduct making a 30 day process @ 9 talks, none my choice.

No ANI Admin discussion. No answers by Fortuna over weeks of messaging on 3 pages. BMK put me in a hall-of-mirrors with 7-8 disruptions (dis.) of my talk edits on 3 pages, moving the AfD discussion to 2 pgs w/ 22 edits in 2+ hrs.

I see a pattern w/ BMK & Fortuna

BK in just 7 mins(or 34 mins. but with +s) reads thru 2 ANIs, a week-long AfD & a users talk? W/o replying BK closes my concerns on 4 talks & deletes the article w/o any admin talk.

15 Apr
Fortuna OKs a more promotional version w/ no input prior to AfD, then never votes/answers/explains for 7 days except by (personal but relevant & fact/not attack).

Posts more deletion "irony" policy vio

26 Apr
1:10 BMK changes my talk page words (dis. #1) w/o answering my concerns+false statement 6:23 contradiction, false statement/incivil ignores my concerns/dehumanizes, showing BMK escalates not resolve (ibid): I don't have a clue what the fuck you're talking about. What I'm talking about is that every editor only gets to !vote on AfD once, and you !voted twice. 6:24 ibid+challenging: duh, no, i only does whatz all da udders duz cause i aint got no brainses. You kmow what, you can stick your comment where the sun doesn't shine, sweetheart...stop being a jerk and hassling editors who disagree with you. (Oh, and yes, my !vote actually does count. It's enough to make you cry, innit?)

6:25 dis. #2 6:34 Buzz off. 6:36 dis. #3 After "buzz off" to ANI, BMK reverses & w/o warning/resolution goes ANI on 'incident' no editor discussed nor talk page alerted me with revisionism+ibid, admits AfD policy vio

7:05 @ my talk contra 7:13 ibid 7:18 7:28 edits over me #4 asking all if I'm "WP:CIR" 7:33 7:35 7:41 ibid + ends with "CIR" narrative There is definitely something... off going on there.

8:07 @AfD. Despite BMK's denial, my fear of editors 'parroting' false statements occurs

8:23
I post on BMK deleting half my title BMK ibid

8:26 Dis. #5 & ibid:You are not worth my time. Don't post here again unless you are required to by Wikipedia policies 8:27
"same as last you bore me" Dis. #6/deletes my notice & ibid.
Dis. #7 + contra

After I notify w/ link @ 8:20, 8:30 BMK ibid after deleting me

8:33 BK edits BMK 8:34 undos 8:39 Merges my ANI after 27 mins. w/o prior admin help. 8:43 While knowing I've been away from AfD closes & deletes article IMO against AfD policies/false w/ ignored questions including by another editor's "to table" yet [is by far (hrs. & days) the 1st to be deleted that wasn't speedy. 8:46 Closes 7 min. old merged ANI w/o any admin help, parroting BMK's false & contras. Parrots BMK's false statements in BK's 1st conversation anywhere on this

30 Apr
Unsolicited Fortuna, IMO mocking

Ref:article unchanged.

Statement by Beyond My Ken

I believe that the fullest understanding of what went on here -- at least from my point of view -- can be had by reading the AfD involved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Corporate_Election_Services), with special attention to Marketdiamond's comments and behavior, and this thread on AN/I: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive883#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FCorporate_Election_Services BMK (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi

Statement by Black Kite

My reply to Marketdiamond can be seen at User_talk:Black_Kite/Archive_57#So_let_me_understand_this. The diffs he gives where I reverted BMK on his talkpage were a mis-click, reverted immediately. Other than that, the place for the discussion of an AfD close is WP:DRV, nowhere else. Black Kite (talk) 13:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by uninvolved Guy Macon

This appears to be a continuation of the dispute at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive883#Requested immediate block on user BMK. I fail to see anything new that was not addressed at ANI. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Hasteur

If there is anything for ArbCom to sort out it is the significant failure to meet basic conduct/behavioral norms. It is my posit that this need not be a full evidentary ArbCom case and could be disposed of by committee endorsed reccomendations (i.e. a warning) or with conduct restricting sanctions (i.e. Boomerang action against the requestor). Admins acted in line with the established policies/guidelines/best practices and therefore have nothing to be addressed. Hasteur (talk) 18:32, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/1/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)

Decline. I'm not seeing anything here that either has not been already dealt with at AN(I) or could not be dealt with there. ArbCom does not deal with article content, and so we will not comment on the AfD - if you wish to challenge the closure the correct venue is, as noted, Wikipedia:Deletion Review (WP:DRV). Thryduulf (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]