Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns | 14 May 2015 | {{{votes}}} |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b) | Motion | none | 26 July 2024 |
| Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral) | none | none | 17 August 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns
Initiated by Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way at 11:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Marketdiamond (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Beyond My Ken (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Black Kite (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beyond_My_Ken&diff=prev&oldid=659252540
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=659257210
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=659262915
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Corporate_Election_Services
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Kite&diff=prev&oldid=659266863
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Kite&diff=prev&oldid=659557252
Statement by Marketdiamond
Not the AfD but conduct making a 30 day process @ 9 talks, none my choice.
No Admin ANI discussion. No answers by Fortuna over a month of messaging me on 3 pages. BMK put me in a hall-of-mirrors with 7-8 disruptions (dis.) of my talk edits on 3 pages, moving the AfD discussion to 2 pages in 2+ hours & 22 edits.
I see a pattern w/ BMK[4] & Fortuna[5]
BK in just 7 mins(or 34 mins. but with +s) reads thru 2 ANIs, a week-long AfD & a users talk? W/o replying BK closes my concerns on 4 talks & deletes the article w/o any admin talk.
15 Apr
Fortuna endorsed a more promotional version[6] w/ no input prior to AfD, then never votes/answers/explains for 7 days except[7] by [8] (personal but relevant & fact/not attack).
Posts more deletion "irony" policy vio:[9]
26 Apr
1:10 BMK changes my talk page words (disruptive #1) w/o answering my concerns+false statement:
[10]
6:23 BMK contradiction, false statement/incivil ignores my concerns/dehumanizes, showing BMK escalates not resolve (ibid): I don't have a clue what the fuck you're talking about. What I'm talking about is that every editor only gets to !vote on AfD once, and you !voted twice.
3:24 BMK:[11]
6:25 BMK dis. #2: [12]
6:34 BMK: Buzz off.
2 min. later BMK dis. #3: [13]
After "buzz off" to ANI, BMK reverses & w/o warning/resolution goes ANI on 'incident' no editor discussed nor talk page alerted me with revisionism+ibid. BMK admitting AfD policy vio: [14]
7:05 BMK @ my talk contra: [15]
BMK ibid: 7:13 [16] 7:18 [17] 7:28 edits over me #4:[18] asking all if I'm "WP:CIR" 7:33 [19] 7:35 [20] 7:41 ibid + ends with "CIR" narrative: There is definitely something... off going on there.
8:07 @AfD. Despite BMK's dismissal my fear of editors 'parroting' false statements occurs: [21]
8:23 I post on BMK deleting half my title:[22] BMK @ ANI ibid:[23]
8:26 BMK dis. #5 & ibid:8:26 You are not worth my time. Don't post here again unless you are required to by Wikipedia policies)
8:27 BMK dis. #6/deletes my notice & ibid. (comment: "same as last you bore me")
8:27 BMK dis. #7, contra [24]
After I notify w/ link @ 8:20[25], 8:30 BMK ibid after deleting me:[26]
8:33 BK edits BMK
8:34 BK undos:[27]
8:39 BK merges my ANI after 27 mins. w/o prior admin help. [28]
8:43 BK, while knowing I've been away from AfD closes & deletes article IMO against AfD policies/false. [29] see [30], not content but conduct w/ ignored questions including by another editor's "to table" yet was by far (hrs. & days) the 1st to be deleted that wasn't speedy.
8:46 BK closes 7 min. old merged ANI w/o any admin help, parroting BMK's false & contras.[31]
BK parrots BMK's false statements in BK's 1st conversation anywhere on this:[32]
30 Apr
Unsolicited Fortuna, IMO mocking:
[33]
Statement by Beyond My Ken
I believe that the fullest understanding of what went on here -- at least from my point of view -- can be had by reading the AfD involved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Corporate_Election_Services), with special attention to Marketdiamond's comments and behavior, and this thread on AN/I: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive883#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FCorporate_Election_Services BMK (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Statement by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
Statement by Black Kite
My reply to Marketdiamond can be seen at User_talk:Black_Kite/Archive_57#So_let_me_understand_this. The diffs he gives where I reverted BMK on his talkpage were a mis-click, reverted immediately. Other than that, the place for the discussion of an AfD close is WP:DRV, nowhere else. Black Kite (talk) 13:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Statement by uninvolved Guy Macon
This appears to be a continuation of the dispute at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive883#Requested immediate block on user BMK. I fail to see anything new that was not addressed at ANI. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/1/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)
- Decline. I'm not seeing anything here that either has not been already dealt with at AN(I) or could not be dealt with there. ArbCom does not deal with article content, and so we will not comment on the AfD - if you wish to challenge the closure the correct venue is, as noted, Wikipedia:Deletion Review (WP:DRV). Thryduulf (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)