User talk:Ronggy

Signing your posts and talk page guidelines

Please sign your posts on talk pages, it is good practice, and facilitates discussion by helping identify the author of a particular comment (WP:SIGNATURE).

WP:TPG explains how to use talk pages (WP:TALK#USE, WP:TPYES). Best regards JimRenge (talk) 11:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have to repeat myself; please sign your posts on talk pages. Sign your posts: "To sign a post, type four tildes (~~~~), and they will be replaced with your username and time stamp. As per WP:SIGN continued and deliberate refusal to sign posts may result in sanctions."

WP:TPG explains how to use talk pages. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 14:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vipassana Meditation Centre

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vipassana Meditation Centre, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://vmc128.8m.com/page20.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 11 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Burmese Buddhist Temple page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly addressed, thanks Rongxiang Lin 02:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm Codename Lisa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to MonoDevelop because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Codename Lisa (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at MonoDevelop, you may be blocked from editing. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amusingly first of all, when 442 recorded edits have been made by this user User:Ronggy, here and now a user Codename Lisa - a user with his/her entire talk page full of Wikipedian criticisms - possibly with a reputation worse than User:Ronggy suggests that User:Ronggy is guilty of vandalism, with a sniff of pure dharma it is actually a good thing that there is an absence of perfection in any sentient being.

Further, the tinge of compassion or even sympathetic joy is that if I were put in the shoes of Codename Lisa, when every other day somebody patronises my talk page and vandalises it, then I gotta be like Codename Lisa defending this action or that moderation, like what was suggested on one end what can be observed is another fellow Wikipedian who works harder than I do, while at the same, what is observed is another fellow Wikipedian who deserves criticisms more than I do. Pretty much of mixed emotions here. I would say thank you, if I were nastier I would say approximately, "Take care of your own talk page and let the world take care of itself (esp. the rest of Wikipedia)".

Reference Errors on 28 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the PAP Community Foundation page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Proposedcentreatgeylang.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Proposedcentreatgeylang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Karmapasingapore2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Karmapasingapore2014.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chen Bing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chen Bing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Bing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 13:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carry on as suggested, makes alright sense. Thanks. Rongxiang Lin 01:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bodhi Meditation Centre

The article Bodhi Meditation Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notabillity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carry on as suggested, makes alright sense. Thanks. Rongxiang Lin 01:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you too.

Userpages

Please don't edit editors userpages as you did here [1] unless there's a typo or it's maintenance related,
Thank you!. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buddhist Fellowship Centre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buddhist Fellowship Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 18:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kuang Chee Tng Temple

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kuang Chee Tng Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 18:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bodhi Meditation Centre.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bodhi Meditation Centre.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 04:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buddhist Fellowship.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buddhist Fellowship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carry on as suggested, makes alright sense. Thanks.Rongxiang Lin 02:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amitabha Buddhist Society

The article Amitabha Buddhist Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero reliable references. All self-published hotel location only. Notability concerns.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AmritasyaPutra^T 03:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amitabha Buddhist Society.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amitabha Buddhist Society.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carry on as suggested, makes alright sense. Thanks.林榮祥 10:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Lee Kuan Yew

I am reverting your edit because:

(1) The capitalisation changes you have made to subheadings are incorrect. Only the initial letter is to be capitalised in headings. So they were correct before you changed them.

(2) I have already changed "agency" to "newspaper" or "work" in several news citations and now you have added more, still putting "agency". In "cite news", the "agency" parameter is for news agencies like AFP. Channel News Asia isn't an agency, it is an online newspaper. -- Alarics (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As far as capitalisation is concerned, it is beyond my authority especially in the context where you may be making specific reference to a form of English whether British, American, or International. If it is a Wikipedia guideline, at this juncture I have yet been informed of such a regulation, although you are perhaps justified in reverting the edit.

What Channel News Asia is, whether an online newspaper, or a television channel, and how its articles and references may be cited, again these are beyond my scope of direct jurisdiction.

You may carry on as you have suggested, assuming that your reverts as well as my previous edit are both recorded by Wikipedia's change management audits, however with some due honesty, apart from the fact that I am anybody but authoritative here at Wikipedia, since I hardly know who you may be, what you may be reverting as well as what other changes you are making here at Wikipedia, they were, and still remain as anything but my direct business.

It is not what you or the world do and do not do that is the problem, it is what I do and do not do that is MY problem

Happy Lunar New Year if you are Asian or if you celebrate this event like certain white Americans such as the founder of Facebook.

As I have specifically quoted a public media release during the prior edit that ESM Goh Chok Tong requesting Singaporeans and the public soliciting their updates directly from the Singapore Prime Minister's Office, your revert has effectively undone a national-level state press release in which case with my limited capacity as an ordinary civilian may I suggest that you either add a system protection tag to the specified Wikipedia article Lee Kuan Yew suggesting you are an authorised administrator, or you acknowledge in reply that you may not know any better than I do.

Thank you林榮祥 10:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Added POV tag because I acknowledge my own biasness in favour of the recovery of Mr Lee Kuan Yew being His citizen. 林榮祥 11:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sabhaktikamanuruddha

The article Sabhaktikamanuruddha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is peacockery invented for Lee Kwan Yu, head of Singapore, and is not a real subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ogress _smash! 11:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is peacockery, can you prove that Lee Kuan Yew actually received the fowl? If Lee Kuan Yew has already passed on, can you prove that this is an invention for him and that he actually received it? You too are less than justified. 林榮祥 11:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sabhaktikamanuruddha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabhaktikamanuruddha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabhaktikamanuruddha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JimRenge (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If deleting this article may be that easy, Wikimedia Foundation may be even easily be history by tomorrow. Without respect lost, 林榮祥 07:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Śūraṅgama Sūtra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 22:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, adding references is fine, yet in order that anybody may add references in the context of Mahayana sutra hundreds of thousands of years old, either he or she may be a practising Buddhist monastic, or he or she may be hundreds or thousands of years old. If I may add a reference in one's own capacity - especially when I am less than qualified at this juncture - there may be more bandwidth debating with you why 'pratise' is spelt this way in this part of the country once colonized by the British - thought you guys were also founded by Englishmen, perhaps asking the obvious, yet why did you guys drive on the other side of the road in contrast with Commonwealth nations, trying to be special or foolish perhaps 林榮祥 07:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Some compassion

	Take care
	Hi Ronggy. I know only a little bit about Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, but I wish you all the best here at planet Earth. Take care, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We all, including ya Joshua, we all get by. Life may be a bitch, then again you are just doing a job, so have I been. In metta most likely perhaps, 林榮祥 07:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sabhaktikamanuruddha. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JimRenge (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this, as a consequence, almost a dozen more Wikipedia pages have been tagged with the

tag noting how verifiability may be a major issue about articles that relate to subject matters hundreds or thousands of years old.

Please don´t forget to log in

please don´t forget to log in. Editing the same article with an account and an IP (disruptively) might result in a block. Best regards JimRenge (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already told Wikipedia more than once perhaps, please delete the account Ronggy. In case you failed again in understanding the meaning of "delete the account Ronggy", it is less about my prerogative in suggesting that Jim Renge deserves a lawsuit, it is more my intuitiveness in suggesting that you are clueless about what you are allowed in doing here at Wikipedia. Your lack of a clue, basically your apparent deprivation of higher learnings like many too suffer from in parts of the Western world, is often forgiven, yet never forgotten. How many buttons did your colleague press on the new coffee machine today before he could get his daily fix? More than three? I'm sorry that is what you face as part of your daily suffering. 林榮祥 09:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop

Please stop posting rants insulting me on my talk page. Ogress _smash! 10:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Np. 林榮祥 02:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and personal attacks directed at other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabhaktikamanuruddha

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sabhaktikamanuruddha, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JZ CL 15:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10Q. 林榮祥 02:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)