Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were useful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... More interactive tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it helpful --Anavimadumim15 (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sohn.philip (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was easy to follow and the sections were clear, concise and not too long!
- What I didn't like
The tutorial videos and interactive features were not compatible with my tablet. Maybe work on that in the future?
- What was missing
How to stop an indent (i.e. I only want to indent the first sentence and leave the rest of the text normal)
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
On my PC, they were really useful!
--BChung2 (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--PeteLambert (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- The videos were very helpful. I followed the videos pausing along the way to edit my sandbox page
--Rahman437 (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos teaching people how to edit an article.
- What I didn't like
More editing skills should be taught at the beginning, e.g. how to insert a picture.
- What was missing
How the editing icons work.
- What was unnecessary
None
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Did not try.
--Daamoy (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It didn't take too long.
- What I didn't like
It was pretty un-stimulating.
- What was missing
Visual content.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Evaregehr (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very detailed training module with good links to videos and tutorials that give a better explanation or allow the user to practice. I like the idea of 5 pillars because it is easy to remember and helps users to better understand what wikipedia is about and what it is not about and how to operate within wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
The videos didn't play until I opened them in youtube, the tutorial was a little frustrating if you accidentally closed it.
- What was missing
I think a better introduction to the coding structure that is used in writing wikipedia articles would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was easy to accidentally close the tutorial and I couldn't figure out how to make it re-launch without going back through the training and then starting the tutorial over. I liked that you could keep trying again until you got it right.
--Glasshn (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The emphasis on a community effort and objectivity.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful, since it displays what the end result should look like. There was a case where I made a mistake and was able to go back and fix it.
--Mr. Senfai (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Interactive modules
- What I didn't like
... Videos
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Easy to follow --Shawn.e.reilly (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dvine16 (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
very comprehensive
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
pretty good
--ModestMoussorgsky (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Interactive excercises, good step-by-step explanations
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very helpful to understand wikipedia
--Vogel ant789 (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials were extremely helpful!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I really liked the interactive editorial tutorial and thought it was very helpful in teaching me how to make the edits. --Kaylynn Nelson (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive videos, very cool and helpful
...
- What I didn't like
- Had some issues figuring out my sandbox vs the one that shows up in the toolbar at the top
...
- What was missing
- explanation of above issue
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Excellent!!
...
--Enarowski (talk) 01:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutorial is very informational and in an organized fashion. ...
- What I didn't like
... Too long.
- What was missing
...I think there was a good mix of information and videos.
- What was unnecessary
... Too many slides.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful.
--24.34.157.125 (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Learning how to upload images
- What I didn't like
How complicated it was
- What was missing
Nothing as far as i can tell
- What was unnecessary
None as far as I know
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought it was interesting
--Attt7 (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--VariedEye (talk) 07:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Simple and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...More practices for editing.
- What was unnecessary
...Some initial pages per module.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not try the interactive editing tutorial yet.
--Delval11 (talk) 14:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative, easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
...More practice
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was great
--Nucomm23 (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Harris.qureshi (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to click through and use, liked the tutorials more than the reading.
- What I didn't like
...A little bit too much wordy information in it at the end, keep that near the beginning.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...very very helpful!
--Alexa cotton (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the interactive portions using the sandbox
...
- What I didn't like
- some instructions had too much text
...
- What was missing
- maybe moving images that shows you what you need to do for certain applications instead of boring text
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing really
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was fun, there needs to be more of it!
...
--Davidk94 (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos are helpful
- What I didn't like
Nothing
- What was missing
How to edit a template
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Not tried
--Cliff310 (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the step-by-step walk through to practice formatting. I also liked that the steps were clear, concise, and had video demonstrations where a visual adds value.
- What I didn't like
... There wasn't anything that I didn't like.
- What was missing
... I would have liked to practice using the sandbox to create a new page vs edit an existing page and how to link it to the original so that other contributors can follow what is going on. I found that portion unclear. However, once I get going with it on my own, I'm sure I will be able to figure it out.
- What was unnecessary
... I thought it was clear and to the point.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought it was useful.
--pharmerJAL (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
... informative, easy to get through and helped me understand a lot more of how wikipedia is created and worked on
- What I didn't like
... Some of the videos are annoying. Also, it gets confusing towards the end with editing and different levels of changing you can create
- What was missing
... I would've liked to have seen more in-depth creating and editing tools, as well as an easier way to find this page in the first place- I needed a link from my instructor, and couldn't find it when I created an account on the site originally.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Really excellent idea, please continue to work on it and make it more available for different features
--Meg.jacoby (talk) 21:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the simplicity of the explanations.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...