Jump to content

User talk:Xeno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Travisk (talk | contribs) at 23:22, 9 December 2010 (Userfy: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

userpage | talk | dashboard | misc

Notes:

  • I will usually reply where original comments occurred and add notifications if thought necessary.
  • You may email me regarding anything sensitive, private, or confidential.
  • I work for or provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation, but this is my personal account. Edits, statements, or other contributions made from this account are my own, and may not reflect the views of the Foundation.
  • Feel free to post a message or ask a question. Please be sure to [[wikilink]] appropriate subjects. Thanks for visiting!
click here to leave a new message...
This user works for the Dunder Mifflin Paper Company.

There is news

What? What do you mean you didn't know about the robes? I thought the only reason anyone ever ran for such a thankless job was so that they could get a nice set of plush golden robes. "In it for the community" you say? Bah! The bling is where it's at. Even the Supreme Court can't top this swag. You could pawn this for a house! Why the heck else did you think that the foundation needed 20 million dollars?

So you're really serious about the whole "helping the community" and "for the good of the project" business? Aww, shucks. Go ahead and keep the robe anyways then. Do us proud.

Congratulations on your victory, may your tenure be peaceful and have a net low adverse interaction on your sanity. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you've been drafted, Mr. Xeno. Congratulations. — Coren (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Well deserved. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me as well! I look forward to working with you in the coming year. Kirill [talk] [prof] 01:36, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your strong showing. :) Amalthea 02:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Me too. Congrats :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto the above, brilliant turnout. Hope you aren't feeling too sick with anticipation ;) - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Its all downhill from here. ;) Syrthiss (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats Dude! :) - NeutralhomerTalk14:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More like a downward spiral, no? =) Thanks guys, –xenotalk 22:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Glad to see this (I mean, sad for you but happy for us). The CommunityTM does occasionally get something right. In fact, with one exception in the in group and one exception in the out group, I'm amazed to discover The CommunityTM and I agreed to an almost eerie degree. Makes me doubt my judgment a little bit... --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another congrats! Pretty impressive support, and completely against the guide writers, too. Hope it isn't all too overwhelming. Jim Miller See me | Touch me 21:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • If I were to hazard a guess, the main reason for the discrepancy is that I put very little effort into my statement & answers and basically just rested on my laurels. Those guide writers who were not familiar with my past efforts thus only had those lackluster morsels with which to make a recommendation. Unfortunately for me, it seems enough of the electorate trusted me to do the job nonetheless! –xenotalk 22:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with main image on Neo (Matrix)

I have tried to put a image I downloaded on the main image and now a IP editor has tried to as well but it is never visible. I am just curious to know what's wrong. − Jhenderson 777 16:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason it wasn't working in the infobox was because there are two "image" parameters. The second one takes precedent, but is empty.
As an aside, perhaps it would be better to choose an image with less spoiler potential? –xenotalk 16:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks for the information. I left the old image in the powers and abilities section, it works because it shows some of his powers. But I got a new image, better? − Jhenderson 777 16:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good =) –xenotalk 16:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need Advice

This user has been adding large swaths of unsourced and largely unnecessary information to radio and television pages. One page, WBIR-TV, had some 20 edits, all could be considered OR and unsourced. I left a small note on the user's talkpage, but an admin (like yourself) could probably put it in better terms. Mind taking a look? - NeutralhomerTalk22:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be better to add fact tags, send them a welcome message, and counsel them on sourcing? Your message to them was a little curt, and their edits appear to be in good faith... –xenotalk 22:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Something like this [1] was what I had in mind. –xenotalk 23:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a tool to see what your deleted edits are

I was wondering if you knew of a tool that would tell me what my deleted edits are. I just noticed on the Edit counter I went from 995 deleted edits to 1035. I would like to find out if I made an edit that broke something or if someone just didnt like the edit. Thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your deleted edits appear to be innocuous AWB stuff to pages that were later deleted for other reasons. You also recently nominated a bunch of templates for speedy deletion. –xenotalk 22:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy

Can you "userfy" the deleted article titled "Friends for Fullerton's Future" for me? Thank you. --Travisk (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]