User talk:Bizpat72

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page No Agenda has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page No Agenda. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to No Agenda. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to No Agenda. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bizpat72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am trying to edit a page with my user ID and I get inappropriate warnings saying that I am vandalizing the page, but it's not the case at all, I am now even blocked from editing. My edits were NOT vandals, they refer to quotes frequently used in the No Agenda podcast and the wiki article has a section to post these recurring expressions, so I am not vandalizing anything but adding valuable information for people interested by the No Agenda show. I also added Edit Summaries to my edits to make sure there was a justification to my edits. Could you please revert the permanent block and tell me why someone is thinking I am vandalizing a page while all I am doing is adding content that's valuable and related to this specific article ???

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I am trying to edit a page with my user ID and I get inappropriate warnings saying that I am vandalizing the page, but it's not the case at all, I am now even blocked from editing. My edits were NOT vandals, they refer to quotes frequently used in the No Agenda podcast and the wiki article has a section to post these recurring expressions, so I am not vandalizing anything but adding valuable information for people interested by the No Agenda show. I also added Edit Summaries to my edits to make sure there was a justification to my edits. Could you please revert the permanent block and tell me why someone is thinking I am vandalizing a page while all I am doing is adding content that's valuable and related to this specific article ??? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I am trying to edit a page with my user ID and I get inappropriate warnings saying that I am vandalizing the page, but it's not the case at all, I am now even blocked from editing. My edits were NOT vandals, they refer to quotes frequently used in the No Agenda podcast and the wiki article has a section to post these recurring expressions, so I am not vandalizing anything but adding valuable information for people interested by the No Agenda show. I also added Edit Summaries to my edits to make sure there was a justification to my edits. Could you please revert the permanent block and tell me why someone is thinking I am vandalizing a page while all I am doing is adding content that's valuable and related to this specific article ??? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I am trying to edit a page with my user ID and I get inappropriate warnings saying that I am vandalizing the page, but it's not the case at all, I am now even blocked from editing. My edits were NOT vandals, they refer to quotes frequently used in the No Agenda podcast and the wiki article has a section to post these recurring expressions, so I am not vandalizing anything but adding valuable information for people interested by the No Agenda show. I also added Edit Summaries to my edits to make sure there was a justification to my edits. Could you please revert the permanent block and tell me why someone is thinking I am vandalizing a page while all I am doing is adding content that's valuable and related to this specific article ??? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}