User talk:Z Victor Alpha
My talk:
Welcome
February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of war crimes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tadija (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Tadija you are mistaken, it wasn't vandalizm because if you go to Talk:List of war crimes, you will see all of my reasoning at the bottom of the page in a new section titled Serb propaganda. I took out things like operations. Operations are military campaigns aimed against oppressors and militant terrorists. War crimes are against civilians. The only link between Operation Storm and war crimes is that when the Croat forces were fighting the Serb invaders, they went a touch too far at times and harmed the occasional Serb civilian. Compare that to Serbs massacering tens of thousands of civilians in all their campaigns 1990-1995 and then Kosova 1998-1999. Z Victor Alpha (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- But you are not allowed to remove wast sections of text without previous discussion. You may propose on the talk page, but you dont WP:own article. Wikipedia is collaboration. Also, please, don't be rude to other editor as you did below. That is regarded as bad Wikipedia behavior. I'll send you some basics, so you can edit easier. All best, --Tadija (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to List of war crimes constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- NO IT DOES NOT. READ THE TALK PAGE AND READ MY REMARK ABOVE THIS ONE. OPERATIONS ARE NOT WAR CRIMES. GOT THAT? Z Victor Alpha (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of war crimes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- DON'T THREATEN ME. YOU ARE NOT AN ESTABLISHED USER HERE. YOU HAVE TO USE TALK IF YOU WANNA MAKE FUNDEMENTAL CHANGES. YOU DON'T HAVE A USERPAGE EITHER SO YOU ARE NOT AN ADMIN. GOODBYE. Z Victor Alpha (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard
- Policy on neutral point of view
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Tadija (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Thankyou Tadija Z Victor Alpha (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Uncle Dick. MaenK.A.Talk 21:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry Madher08 - I was getting angry with this user Uncle Dick who sprung up from nowhere and became an overnight expert on War Crimes. He is not using the talk page, he is not obiding by Wikipedia guidelines and he is accusing me of engaging in an edit war when he is the very opponent, instead of a neutral editor having a word with him too, I am being picked on disgracefully here. Z Victor Alpha (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of war crimes. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of war crimes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. You are breaching Wikipedia rules. Tadija (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Despite the above warnings you have continued to make obstructive edits, as, for example, at at User talk:Uncle Dick. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a playground. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Good work Z Victor Alpha. Neutral Solution 100 (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)